I am an enormous fan of Professor Wayne Hope, his book, The Anthropocene, Global Capitalism and Global Futures is a devastating critique of the capitalism behind global warming the true enormity of what we are dealing with.
You can not pretend to have an opinion on climate change if you have not read this book.
He argued that there is a collision of epochs of Anthropocene and exploitative capitalism.
He calls these a crisis of time.
- Financialised Capitalism and systemic failure.
- Global Capitalism and Systemic Failure.
- Humankind’s Finitude and Earth System Deterioration.
He notes the difference of ‘deep time’ which is a natural science perspective of vast time periods vs the epochs of human civilisation and the power to define epochs.
The power to define standardised chronological time is a crucial infrastructure of capitalism.
Real time connectivity is essential for instant real time capitalism and trumps clock time.
This command of time gives Capitalism enormous power.
This is at odds with the human time experience of temporality where time is experienced as in the moment and of cultural memory.
This human experience of temporal time collides with Capitalisms command and control of standardised real time immediacy of time.
This time temporality leans into the biological and natural world experience of time that are based on seasons.
These natural experiences of time, be it human or natural world, clash with capitalisms immediate command of real time.
Deep time vs exploitative capitalism that causes biological system collapse are beyond the human experience of temporality.
The last 11 700 years since the last Ice Age have seen a stability of climate generated by natural rhythms of the planet that have allowed for agriculture and civilisation creation.
That Holocene Epoch has collided with the Anthropocene Epoch which has disrupted the biosphere in a way previously beyond our capacity.
Tipping points built into the biosphere once breached will dramatically impact the temporal experience of human beings who can no longer challenge the real time Capitalism control of time as markets, financialization and commodification of real time carbon trading eclipse the lived experience of system collapse.
You might be flooded, but markets are still trading against your misfortune of being flooded.
The environmental situation the global population finds itself in is universally blamed on everyone rather than actually place the blame on exploitative capitalism and the corporations that drive that.
Professor Hope argues that two Epochal Formations Converge.
- Global Capitalism as a fraught sociological totality.
- Earth system epochality and the Anthropocene.
He argues that social democracy has been hollowed out by transnationals and we have lost economic sovereignty.
Agribusiness dominance, exploitation of global workers, global consumerism, Transnational hegemony, these all creates a gravity to global capitalism that is unprecedented.
Māori have cultural memory of the first wave of white settler capitalist exploitation resource taking, they have the flax roots knowledge of what sustainability and environmental protection looks like, it is no wonder that international right wing think tanks always aim to attack indigenous rights first to enable the next generation of exploitative resource stripping.
Professor Hope’s conclusion is Global Capitalism and Sociological Collapse:
- Myopia of capitalist time-profit standardisation.
- Crisis of temporal progressivity
- Denials of coevalness in crisis
Professor Wayne leaves us with this hope:
Time Principles of Ecosocialism
1: Knowing how to build sustainable ecological communities reflects a reconciliation between the human time of global history and the deep time of Earth history.
2: Repairing ecological life for future generations entails the synchronisation of biotic, animal, bird and insect life cycles.
3: The production and consumption of safe, nutritious food for all nurtures soil-based nutrient cycles and respects the rhythms of seasonality.
4: National agricultural policies prioritise domestic farming traditions of food self-sufficiency over the fast turnover times of corporate agri food production.
5: Energy for electricity grids is naturally renewable over ecological time rather than extracted on the basis of capitalist time.
6: Green, public-urban housing complexes within mass transport networks foster long-lasting intergenerational communities.
7: A steady-state macroeconomy involving re-use and re-manufacture of materials and consumer durable avoids the accelerated turnover times of global capitalism’s value chains.
8: Ending the incessant hyper-consumption of soon-to-be-obsolete products strengthens the steady-state macroeconomy.
9: Technologically enabled reductions in the work-time of waged labour, equally distributed, expand human temporal autonomy.
10: Operating businesses guided by the public memory systems of registries, deeds, statements of account and legal judgements replaced “off-balance sheet” financial speculation.
11: Major banks and other financial institutions fund long-run strategies of renewable energy development.
12: Through monetary and fiscal policies, democratic governments coordinate and plan the steady-state economy over intergenerational time.
13: Slow eco-tourism values the journey itself and fosters cross-cultural; appreciations of time.
14: Activating these principles is a political struggle over the meaning and usage of time
I believe Wayne’s book, The Anthropocene, Global Capitalism and Global Futures is one of the most important books on climate change that NZ has ever produced.
If you haven’t read it, you can’t have an opinion on climate change.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.



Maybe worth a consideration, as an add on to the time principles will be the need for a conflict resolution service. Especially in the transition from the here and now, to the future as desired.
All sounds good until you have one dissident with an opposing view of one or more of the time principles.
Who decide what is the correct way forward? Will democracy live?
I think that beyond your ideas Gerrit we must develop parameters when considering ideas, familiar behaviour, and dissidents. We must on occasions anyway go through a checking process, similar to the one that air pilots used on their instrumentation capability before computerisation took over. With people it would be a mindset check and conform to some requirements such as, what are the values on which this action is based? – 1 Have I delayed speaking for five seconds (to allow my mind to digest the original input), 2 Is mine a reasonable answer in tune with the provoking question etc
We have made machines that can think like us, and that was an unthought through exercise, as so much of what we do is. So we have to adopt definitely, modes of thinking that anyone in a position of importance will use, and enforced by teaching and hearings about complaints, and refreshing the skill with summer school debates at universities and polytechnics run by the state.
I have had a fine for pausing and not stopping at a place where I could see it okay and appropriate to go. However the Stop system was brought in to reduce accidents and in general is sensible and good. Applying that thinking to our expressions of cogitation , and to that process also, becomes absolute.
There must be a time for certainty and seriousness and responsible values, and then a short break when one can listen to Monty Python or some OTT comedians. But our minds are not trained at present, too often strained and not in the way of Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice – we should act out his good lines:
The quality of mercy is not strained; It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest; It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.
‘Tis mightiest in the mightiest. It becomes
The thronèd monarch better than his crown….
Where is bob1st and entrails of comet (comedians)? When the going is tough, the tough get going, some saying – what does that mean Bob1st? I thought you would be right here with Trev and Dilly Ann with your pre-packaged ideas all ready to go and drown us all in platitudes.
Getting discussion started? If there was a capricious comment on an image on captions? Getting acknowledgment of the excitable nature of our brains as well as making ourselves thoughtful perhaps.
Some links and material relating to the witch trial in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kzSaYvyYq0
Witch Trial Scene 3.46m
1 https://blog.apaonline.org/2019/06/27/monty-python-witch-trial-validity-soundness-and-the-fallacy-of-the-undistributed-middle/ (Used in studies.)
2 Another reference to how it came about so there is a reference point.
( A point from another link. …’Monty Python is creating their micro version of The Crucible, playwright Arthur Miller’s metaphor for McCarthyism using the Salem witch trials. It’s challenging …’)
3 Another studying link starts off looking at local fallacies.using the witch trial as an example.
https://hvrpindianapolis.wordpress.com/2017/03/01/four-irritating-fallacies-monty-python-style/
(This is good for people like me who have not done study into this previously.)
Warbler old chap your admiration of academia is to be saluted your ignorance however colours your views.
Elvis loves you my child.
Golly Gosh Bob.T.F. the old colonial anachronism!
Hello Wayne I hope you will put up some other posts with less scary headings that we can wrap our brains around. It seems that we need to be awoken by a Prince of Pulchitrude to avoid becoming irrelevant also-rans.
Comments are closed.