Is this the ad that sparked Jim Grenon’s NZME takeover?
The Free Speech Union has confirmed it initially encouraged billionaire Jim Grenon’s investment in the NZME media group.
Grenon, a Canadian-born private equity investor, plans to clean out the board and set a new direction for the company, which owns the New Zealand Herald and about half the country’s commercial radio stations.
Jonathan Ayling, chief executive of the Free Speech Union, confirmed it was the campaign group that first suggested he become an investor.
Now we know that the alt-Right astroturf Free Speech Union instigated Canadian Alt-Right Billionaire, Jim Grenon’s take over of NZME, the Herald and ZB, we really need to pause and ask some very serious questions about allowing a radicalised Billionaire to own and exert editorial control over some of the largest News platforms in this country.
The Free Speech Union are a Zionist apologist front group with direct links to the Atlas Network, the International Far Right Think Tank that is funded by big pollution money and radicalised culture war billionaires. It is led by a white South African who lectures New Zealanders on free speech, which would be the most hilarious part of the organisation if you didn’t add to them supporting violence for their free speech…
…and their weird social media feed that comes across like the frenetic reckons of a 19 year old Incel who hasn’t masturbated to Henti Porn for 48 hours because mums wifi account is almost out at the end of the month.
This is the group who raged against against 440 Christian Leaders using their free speech…
…so these alt-Right culture war extremists are the ones who helped an alt-Right Canadian Billionaire attempt to take over our largest media platforms???
We are in so much trouble and we can’t see it.
To date, the defence for this Alt-Right Canadian Billionaire taking over NZME has been that he’s just your average run of the mill vulture capitalist who will strip assets from NZME and make a quick killing.
All fine and good, however critics like me have pointed to:
- The sly manner NZMEs largest shareholder seems to have worked alongside Grenon to put forward an attack on the current Board that isn’t true.
- His support of anti-vaxx fear grifter Chantelle Baker.
- His war on the Journalists Union.
- His support for a far right fringe alt-right culture war hate blog that has an anti-Trans, anti-Māori, anti-Treaty, anti-vaccine and climate denying editorial line.
What we are seeing with news that he wanted to buy Stuff’s newspapers 5 years ago doesn’t speak of a vulture capitalist wanting to shred assets, it speaks to a radical far right Billionaire who wants media platforms to sell his damaged view of the world.
Don’t we have enough radicalised billionaires shaping our media?
Rupert Murdoch was just the start, the new breed are even more radicalised.
Jeff Bezos has turned out the light of democracy at the Washington Post…
…Elon continues to make Fascism Great Again by turning the Twitter Town square into a Brown Shirt Jamboree…
Hate speech on X surged for at least 8 months after Elon Musk takeover – new research
…and now alt-Right Canadian Billionaire James Grenon is attempting to take over the NZME platform including ZB and the NZ Herald.
Grenon could just be your average run of the mill vampire capitalists who sees value in selling off OneRoof and making a quick buck OR he could be a radicalised culture war Billionaire who wants a far right culture war editorial line and his previous support of Alt-Right Hate Blogs and anti-vaxx grifters is alarmingly suggesting an ulterior motive.
His push for control has created genuine fears of his editorial line, so much so that the Journalists Union has published an open letter to him…
Open Letter
To: Mr James Grenon and the Board of NZME
OPEN LETTER: PROTECT MEDIA INDEPENDENCE
Tēnā koutou,
We write out of deep concern that editorial independence at NZME is under threat.
Editorial independence is the bedrock of professional journalism. It means that journalists can report freely and truthfully without external influence, whether from the state or private interests.
To be able to exercise this role journalists, cannot be subject to direction from the very interests they are supposed to be monitoring, and where necessary, criticising.
The principle of editorial independence is upheld in the E tū Journalists Code of Ethics, and in the Global Charter of Ethics established by the International Federation of Journalists, of which E tū is a member.
We welcome any commitments from you, Mr Grenon, to quality journalism and improvements to career paths for journalists, both of which you have recently articulated. We also agree that the media ecosystem in New Zealand as a whole is facing critical challenges which we all have an interest in addressing.
However, your stated plan to replace most members of the NZME board with the aim of focusing on operational aspects of NZME remains very concerning for us. Decisions on content in our mastheads, broadcasting and digital outlets need to be fully independent and free from board level direction.
In light of these concerns, we are asking you to immediately affirm that the principle of editorial independence will be upheld across NZME regardless of any changes to board membership. Specifically, we ask for you to publicly affirm:
-
-
- That you will uphold editorial independence and that board members will not use their positions to steer the content of any NZME outlets through direction or appointments.
- That any structural changes you seek to make, such as the establishment of an Editorial Board, have the primary aim and function of preserving editorial independence on an ongoing basis.
- We also ask to meet with you, Mr Grenon, and with the current board to discuss these concerns and the future of NZME.
-
We look forward to your positive response on these matters.
Noho ora mai
E tū Delegates at NZME representing E tū members
E tū Journalist Code of Ethics
(as enshrined in the Rules of E tū, cited 6 March 2025)
Respect for truth and the public’s right to information are overriding principles for all journalists. In pursuance of these principles, journalists commit themselves to ethical and professional standards. All members of the Union engaged in gathering, transmitting, disseminating, and commenting on news and information shall observe the following Code of Ethics in their professional activities:
(a) They shall report and interpret the news with scrupulous honesty by striving to disclose all essential facts and by not suppressing relevant, available facts or distorting by wrong or improper emphasis.
(b) They shall not place unnecessary emphasis on gender, race, sexual preference, religious belief, marital status or physical or mental disability.
(c) In all circumstances they shall respect all confidences received in the course of their occupation.
(d) They shall not allow personal Interests to influence them in their professional duties.
(e) They shall not allow their professional duties to be influenced by any consideration, gift or advantage offered and, where appropriate, shall disclose any such offer.
(f) They shall not allow advertising or commercial considerations to influence them in their professional duties.
(g) They shall use fair and honest means to obtain news, pictures, films, tapes and documents.
(h) They shall identify themselves and their employers before obtaining any interview for publication or broadcast.
(I) They shall respect private grief and personal privacy and shall have the right to resist compulsion to intrude on them.
(j) They shall do their utmost to correct any published or broadcast information found to be harmfully inaccurate.
A breach of this Code shall be a breach of the Union’s Rules and thus may give rise to disciplinary procedures under the Rules. If a member is dismissed from employment or otherwise disadvantaged by an employer, and a breach of this Code is claimed by the employer as justification for the dismissal or disadvantage, then the Union, following proper and adequate inquiry, and if it is satisfied to a reasonable degree that the employer’s actions are justified, may decline to pursue a personal grievance on behalf of the member.
Global Charter of Ethics for Journalists
The IFJ Global Charter of Ethics for Journalists was adopted at the 30th IFJ World Congress in Tunis on 12 June 2019. It completes the IFJ Declaration of Principles on the Conduct of Journalists (1954), known as the ”Bordeaux Declaration”.
The Charter is based on major texts of international law, in particular the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It contains 16 articles plus a preamble and defines journalists’ duties and rights regarding ethics.
Preamble
The right of everyone to have access to information and ideas, reiterated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, underpins the journalist’s mission. The journalist’s responsibility towards the public takes precedence over any other responsibility, in particular towards their employers and the public authorities. Journalism is a profession, which requires time, resources and the means to practise – all of which are essential to its independence. This international declaration specifies the guidelines of conduct for journalists in the research, editing, transmission, dissemination and commentary of news and information, and in the description of events, in any media whatsoever.
-
- Respect for the facts and for the right of the public to truth is the first duty of the journalist.
- In pursuance of this duty, the journalist shall at all times defend the principles of freedom in the honest collection and publication of news, and of the right of fair comment and criticism. He/she will make sure to clearly distinguish factual information from commentary and criticism.
- The journalist shall report only in accordance with facts of which he/ she knows the origin. The journalist shall not suppress essential information or falsify any document. He/she will be careful to reproduce faithfully statements and other material that non-public persons publish in social media.
- The journalist shall use only fair methods to obtain information, images, documents and data and he/she will always report his/her status as a journalist and will refrain from using hidden recordings of images and sounds, except where it is impossible for him/her to collect information that is overwhelmingly in the public interest. He/she will demand free access to all sources of information and the right to freely investigate all facts of public interest.
- The notion of urgency or immediacy in the dissemination of information shall not take precedence over the verification of facts, sources and/or the offer of a reply.
- The journalist shall do the utmost to rectify any errors or published information which is found to be inaccurate in a timely, explicit, complete and transparent manner.
- The journalist shall observe professional secrecy regarding the source of information obtained in confidence.
- The journalist will respect privacy. He/she shall respect the dignity of the persons named and/or represented and inform the interviewee whether the conversation and other material is intended for publication. He/she shall show particular consideration to inexperienced and vulnerable interviewees.
- Journalists shall ensure that the dissemination of information or opinion does not contribute to hatred or prejudice and shall do their utmost to avoid facilitating the spread of discrimination on grounds such as geographical, social or ethnic origin, race, gender, sexual orientation, language, religion, disability, political and other opinions.
- The journalist will consider serious professional misconduct to be
-
- plagiarism
- distortion of facts
- slander, libel, defamation, unfounded accusations
-
- The journalist shall refrain from acting as an auxiliary of the police or other security services. He/she will only be required to provide information already published in a media outlet.
- The journalist will show solidarity with his/her colleagues, without renouncing his/her freedom of investigation, duty to inform, and right to engage in criticism, commentary, satire and editorial choice.
- The journalist shall not use the freedom of the press to serve any other interest and shall refrain from receiving any unfair advantage or personal gain because of the dissemination or non-dissemination of information. He/she will avoid – or put an end to – any situation that could lead him/her to a conflict of interest in the exercise of his/her profession. He/she will avoid any confusion between his activity and that of advertising or propaganda. He/she will refrain from any form of insider trading and market manipulation.
- The journalist will not undertake any activity or engagement likely to put his/her independence in danger. He/she will, however, respect the methods of collection/dissemination of information that he / she has freely accepted, such as “off the record”, anonymity, or embargo, provided that these commitments are clear and unquestionable.
- Journalists worthy of the name shall deem it their duty to observe faithfully the principles stated above. They may not be compelled to perform a professional act or to express an opinion that is contrary to his/her professional conviction or conscience.
- Within the general law of each country the journalist shall recognize in matters of professional honour, the jurisdiction of independent self-regulatory bodies open to the public, to the exclusion of every kind of interference by governments or others.
…Grenon’s response to this letter has been to attack the Union!
To date Grenon has done all he can to hide his true editorial intent, but his connection to right wing hate blogs and antivaxx grifters suggests another agenda.
The way NZME has been misrepresented financially by a major shareholder reeks of a set up.
Grenon has sold his take over as a profitable one, but a radical change in editorial position would see a readership and advertiser revolt causing the share price to crash which would allow Grenon to buy an even larger share so that he can dominate the editorial agenda because when it comes to radicalised alt-Right billionaires taking over the media, they don’t care if it makes money or not because they don’t want money!
Billionaires they already have money, they want power.
Allowing a vampire capitalist shred NZME for a quick buck is one thing, allowing an alt-right radicalised billionaire drive ZB and NZ Herald into a culture war is another.
I’m waiting for this alt-Right Billionaire appointing Cameron Slater, Peter Williams, Sean Plunket, Detective Ani O’Brian of the Terf Police and JFK wannabe Chantelle Baker to the new Herald Editorial Board.
The Right have weaponised Free Speech (thanks to our middle class woke feminist non-binary activists) to shut down debate, not facilitate it. The Right are Free Speech hypocrites and we are seeing that manifest in America right now.
These alt-Right Free Speech Fetishists whose goal is to protect their right to bigotry influenced an alt-Right Canadian Billionaire to want to seize the editorial controls of the largest media platforms in NZ.
Again.
Our Fourth Estate is supposed to keep the powerful in check, it isn’t supposed to allow the powerful to control us!
You are having your petty bigotries whipped up to eclipse what the Billionaire Class and their enablers are really doing.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
I mean shit. Do we really want reruns of fox/sky news in a kiwi ascent?
Comments are closed.