While National are warned against draconian work for the dole sanctions…
Government warned against work-for-the-dole sanctions, documents reveal
The coalition government was warned that work-for-the-dole programmes do not increase the chances of people coming off welfare and into work, documents have revealed.
Cabinet has agreed to introduce a suite of new obligations and sanctions, including community work experience (CWE), for job seekers next year.
Official advice, obtained by the Greens under the Official Information Act, shows the Ministry of Social Development warned against CWE in May.
“As described, CWE is essentially a work-for-the-dole programme if it was to be made mandatory,” the departmental report said.
“Most evidence shows that work-for-the-dole programmes do not increase the probability of participants moving off [the] benefit and into employment.
“Instead, participants remain on benefit longer than would otherwise be the case (known as the lock-in effect). Investment into other employment supports may be more cost effective.”
…let’s be very clear, this is counter productive social policy that will cost us more in the long run but Right wing voters despise beneficiaries and they want to bash the dirty filthy Bennies as much as they love to bash da Māoris, as much as they love to bash the workers, renters, the environment and the poor.
Look at how National are secretly attempting to shift the goal posts on poverty stats so you the voter never appreciate the level of damage this Government are causing…
Documents obtained by Child Poverty Action Group under the Official Information Act reveal the Minister for Child Poverty Reduction, Louise Upston, is considering changing our country’s long-term child poverty reduction targets.
Unlocking children and whanau from poverty is the right and compassionate thing to do. It is also a non-partisan issue. In 2018, in a moment of political harmony, National, Labour, NZ First and the Green parties supported the introduction of the Child Poverty Reduction Act. [1] In doing so they signed up to the ten year goal of halving child poverty by 2028. On the election trail Christopher Luxon recommitted National to the promise of halving child poverty by 2028.
However, documents obtained under the OIA reveal that earlier this year the Child Poverty Reduction Minister considered changing the ten-year targets at the same time as she weakened the third intermediate child poverty targets. [2] The documents suggest the Minister decided it ‘was not the right time’ and that she would continue to consider when and how the ten-year targets would be changed. [3]
CPAG Chairperson Sally Ward states, ‘We have made a commitment as a country to end child poverty. We need the government to keep their promise and deliver the policies that will allow all children to reach their potential. We’ve made progress before, and we can do it again.’
For example, between 2018 and 2022 New Zealand saw statistically significant reductions on 8 out of the 9 poverty measures. As officials noted, the reductions ‘exceeded the average reductions required to meet the ten-year targets’ partly because the previous government ‘delivered significant investments … aimed at lifting the incomes of low-income households as well as wider initiatives aimed at addressing the deeper causes of poverty’. [4]
However, in April this year, the Minister was advised that the coalition-government’s policies were ‘likely to fall well short of the reductions required to meet the current ten-year targets’. Furthermore, the Minister was warned that other policy changes like those to the school lunch programme and public transport subsidies ‘could potentially have a negative impact on progress towards reducing material hardship’. [5]
As previously reported, the Minister was presented with options that would put us back on track, but has so far, failed to pull those levers.
CPAG Executive Officer Sarita Divis states, ‘We are seeking a commitment from the National-led coalition that we will retain our ten-year target of halving child poverty, and the government will do all in its power to ensure we meet those targets.’
‘Nicola Willis said she would resign if she failed to deliver the tax cuts she promised during the election. Well, the Prime Minister promised he would retain our 2028 goal on the election trail. Why are children and families experiencing the constraints of poverty being treated differently?’ Divis asks.
Ward also encourages the New Zealand public to call on all politicians in parliament to hold each other to account on this issue of national significance.
This November CPAG is launching a campaign called #PACT2028 that calls upon New Zealanders to show their support for children and whanau experiencing poverty and reminds our politicians of the pact they have made.
Visit our website for more details about how you can be involved. Together, we can end child poverty in New Zealand.
‘If we are to meet the 2028 target then we need politicians from across the political spectrum to once again come together and deliver on the promises they made.’ Divis states.
BACKGROUND:
In 2015 the then-National Government signed up to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which included a commitment to halve poverty rates by 2030.
In 2018 all parties in parliament, except ACT, supported the introduction of the Child Poverty Reduction Act, which included a ten-year goal to halve child poverty.
Under the Act the Child Poverty Reduction Minister must set intermediate targets every three years that support the overall goal to halve poverty. Upston’s earlier decision to soften those targets means it will be harder to meet our long-term goal.
OIA documents reveal that when the Minister lowered the third-intermediate targets, official assumed she was going to seek cross-party agreement to new ten-year targets. [6]
The advice she received in March 2024 was to set the level of the ten-year targets in principle and then set the third intermediate targets. [7] This did not happen, instead she set the third intermediate targets alone and these did not align with the ten-year targets. [8]
In March 2024, officials advised the Minister that ‘the current trajectory is off-track to meet the ten-year targets without significant and timely, further investment [which would be possible through income support increases through the tax and benefit system].’ Instead, the Minister’s chosen path was (in the officials’ words) likely to have a ‘modest, and more uncertain, impact on measured poverty rates’. [9]
In June 2024, the Minister was provided with the following speaking points:
– ‘There is currently a mismatch between the proposed third intermediate targets and the ten-year targets due to be achieved a year later’. [10]
– ‘I considered changing the ten-year targets alongside setting the third intermediate targets, but decided now was not the right time.’
– ‘The proposed third intermediate targets are significantly higher than the ten-year targets due to be achieved in 2027/28, which is just a year after the third intermediate target period ends (2026/27). But I have set the intermediate targets in line with what I consider to be achievable in the current context. I am continuing to consider whether the ten-year targets need to be changed and when the right time to do this would be.’ [11]
…this Government’s focus is on their donor interests, not the peoples interests and they are changing the poverty stats so you aren’t aware of just how corrosive the Rights agenda on Welfare really is.
Kiss have had their anger, ignorance and petty bigotries manipulated time and time and time again.
Anytime a Far Right Government wants to ram their corporate interests through, they bash the dirty filthy Bennies, da Māoris, da gangs, renters and workers to offer up political smokescreens so voters are distracted with the joy of seeing groups they despise suffer rather than realise they’ve had their internal malice manipulated to ensure rich corporations get more while they get less.
The ease with which you are all manipulated is terrifying.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
No surprise there she is a mean mouth person .Like Paula benefit she forgets how much the state helped her get where she is right now .
Another ladder puller Minister.
The logical flaw in all of this is the Reserve Bank and Capital and CoC wanting higher unemployment, then making life miserable indeed for the resulting unemployed via sanctions, work for the dole and general sadism from WINZ/MSD.
At least Labour during peak COVID created a second tier middle class benefit where a partner could still work! and the rate was around $490 per week, and you did not have to interact with punitive case managers. I did not approve of that at all because it played into the ‘deserving/undeserving’ narrative. But nonetheless, it showed there was awareness at top level, not that they ever stated it, of how shit the welfare system is.
If the parasite class wants unemployment they should treat bennies well. Don’t businesses need customers? a low wage economy and unemployment reduces purchasing power, lose lose.
In their previous time in power they pretended that making water quality standards wadeable instead of swimmable was the same so changing the child poverty targets so that they can pretend to be reducing child poverty is not surprising.
Natattact Minister for anything (but particularly people-oriented policies) have been said to append the acronym? at the bottom of long summaries of longer factual and theoretical documents, the letters ‘Tl:Dr’.
So what they are saying is there are jobs to be done but we dont want to set them up as real work because we will have to pay real wages and have ACC cover .This way we can get cut rate people and treat them like shit because we can dump them down the black hole because they are bottom feeders .My brother inlaw was involved in these work programs in the 1980s .They all went to clean out rivers and lay cobble stone foot paths that have now all been ripped up .It was demeaning pointless work .
Had some mates in the eighties sent out stoned to count the cracks on an air base runway. I guess the job needed to be done. They had a good time. Wouldn’t groups of people doing some kind of work be better than kids sitting at home by themselves taking drugs and playing first shooter vid games. (My view of ‘kids today’).
Nothing wrong with work for the dole as long as the work has value and the dole is the minimum wage. The last politician in NZ to run that scheme was Muldoon.
I talked to Upston once and she said she got into politics to help people. lol – as dim as a fragrance candle.
Well she meant the people with lots of money
Comments are closed.