Climate strategy ‘as useful as teats on a bull’, Greenpeace says
Greenpeace says the government’s five pillar strategy for tackling climate change is “about as useful as teats on a bull”.
The government announced its five climate pillars on Wednesday, but did not reveal any policy detail, saying that was coming in the next two weeks.
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts said the three-page strategy was a “comprehensive” and “ambitious” plan to reduce the impacts of climate change and prepare for its future effects.
Each of the five pillars was accompanied by three aspirational bullet points (e.g. “The costs of reducing emissions are minimised”) arising from the core goal set out in each pillar, but with no explanation as to how all this would be achieved. More details have been promised in the forthcoming Emissions Reduction Plan.
Climate groups slammed the strategy as meaningless and including nothing that would combat climate change.
Climate scientists and researchers were also highly critical, pointing to the lack of specificity, given how long the government has been in office and the large number of climate policies it has repealed.
Greenpeace said the strategy was “about as useful as teats on a bull”.
Greenpeace Aotearoa spokesperson Sinéad Deighton-O’Flynn said the “so-called climate strategy” was a “kick in the guts for people around Aotearoa who had their homes and communities flooded recently due to extreme weather events.”
This Government’s environmental agenda amounts to Climate Fascism.
Their acquiescence to Corporate Dairy and Real Estate Pimps amounts to a climate change policy that will cost us $24Billion FFS…
-
- Simon Watts unveiled the Government’s long-awaited Emissions Reduction Plan (ERP), which shows the Coalition’s policies are forecast to increase net emissions by 22 million tonnes by 2030, which means the Government is set to fail to meet the third Zero Carbon Act Budget for 2030-35 and miss the net zero target for 2050. The Paris Agreement liability is estimated at 97 million tonnes (mt), which Treasury has estimated could cost up to $24 billion to ensure New Zealand can keep exporting to Europe and the UK.
…what is the actual solution here?
When we have to pay the $24billion once it is apparent that our emissions have gone up and not down, what exactly will the Right wing argument be?
Let me guess, the ZB Trolls will start screaming, “why are we paying $24billion for an agreement in Paris we shouldn’t have signed in the first place”.
What will the actual claim be? T
hat we don’t pay our international obligations?
That we don’t pay the $24billion?
Is that what the argument will be?
So it’s climate fascism that will side step our global obligations at a time when the planet is melting.
The heat is only building, it isn’t going down, we are seeing record breaking temperature after record breaking temperature.
There’s a tipping point within the population that will demand a radical re-ordering of the economy and society that shatters the current political spectrum…
-
- A US study has found insurance costs are set to rise 600-800% in coming years because of increased damage from storms and sea-level change caused by climate change.
…catastrophic climate change is here, this Government is simply pouring petrol on the fire.




It’s ok Martyn we can roll out our carbon capture machine. They just have to adjust the filters because it currently keeps sucking all the nearby flying pigs into the intakes.
They are nothing short of an irresponsible embarrassment.
Carbon capture is a bloody joke .They only have to garantee it will not leak into the atmosphere for 20 years .What a crock that is .After that what happens double carbon levels I guess
https://environment.govt.nz/assets/J001281-MfE-Climate-strategy-brochure-FF_webV2.pdf
This climate strategy uses some presently meaningful catchwords but has no substance, content, time-scales and costing, etc.
If this reflects the level of actual NZ Government Planning related to climate adaptation, it is extremely disappointing.
–
This is what happens and will happen …
1. Temperature will continue to increase and gradually change the climate zones all over the world, leading to different conditions for access to land, oceans, air/space, soil, water, forests, other resources.
2. An intense, destructive global run by the industrialized countries on required natural resources has already started, will gradually come into full swing in all parts of the planet.
3. Hand in hand with this final plunder and exploitation, a new form of colonization will lead to the global expansion of the MIC, e.g. NATO, AUKUS, QUAD etc.
4. All sort of disasters will encounter government and hit local populations that are not sufficiently or ill prepared.
5. Some political actors might be inclined to using military confrontations as a means to distract from climate and similar catastrophes.
6. The Pacific and Antarctica will become a global hotspot for diverging economic and military powers.
7. The highest priorities for the population are Early Warning Systems and Disaster Risk Reduction measures.
Direct and massive reactions of the populations may take place, somehow, somewhere, around phases 3. and 4., and may appear in all sorts of human responses, good or bad, with violence in all shapes probably becoming a main option.
Comments are closed.