Nicola Willis calls comment from minister Dr Duncan Webb about National’s loyalties ‘reprehensible’
Nicola Willis says a minister’s suggestion that National’s loyalties lie with the “big end of town” is a “reprehensible” comment.Â
But Consumer and Commerce Affairs Minister Dr Duncan Webb is standing by it.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Nicola believes Duncan Webb insinuating that National are a rich prick party is a ‘reprehensible’ comment.
Ummmm.

Yeah.
Top 5 largest donors behind Nationals 2023 campaign
Graeme Hart: $250,000
Murray Bolton: $250,000
Nick Mowbray: $250,000
Bayley’s Real Estate: $164,600
Brendan and Jo Lindsay: $130,000
Net worth
Graeme Hart: 9.7 billion >
Murray Bolton: 400 million >
Nick Mowbray: 1-3 billion
Bayley’s: a fuckin lot
Brendan/Jo: 750 million >
National are the political party of the Billionaires, corporate Farmers, the Banks, the property speculators and Chinese Business interests.
For Nicola to act outraged is performance art politics.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media



Nicola squeals at many things, she’s best ignored.
Vile woman. Crusher 2.0. Look out Lux Luther!
Bellatrix Lestrange (Harry Potter – most loyal to Lord Voldermort – died at the end).
Time for National to enter the real world from their fantasy land and stop trying to deny the clearly obvious. Willis destroys her credibility again.
Nicola Willis should resign for lying.
Even given you’re a cheer leader for your masters and mistresses, She’s not bad eh?
I’m not sure It even has the capability to see things like hypocrisy or anything other than through a politiCISED lens.
Like that lesser being Paula Benefit before Her, there goes very Fugly. Fuk ’em both and all who sail in them.
Life is going to be a long lesson and short time span for the both of them. Ew.
No cheerleader, just espouse balance to ridiculous comments particularly by you know who.
I like your reference of the analogy between Willis and Bennett.
Willis sounds like a real estate agent now, although as someone else said her slow pronunciation of words is so her right wing followers can understand what she’s saying.
When it all goes tits up, she’s probably auditioning for a part in Shortland Street (on the so-called public broadcaster funded by philanthropy and sponsorship of course).
When that happens, Paula Benefit will be hosting some panel show on subscription, such as how to lose the biggest amount of flab in the shortest of time.
Fuck they’re ugly!
Hark at Nicola Willis!
Christ how I wish I’d kept some of Her conversations in an Uber. Just as I do some of the Brahman Left and Merchant Right wankers that try and preach the Almighty now. A pox on all of them – except for the fact that they provide me with popcorn amusement daily.
She’s not really that moist is It.
(Note to self and Uber slave: Stay away from Karori, unless you can be sure its Corin the Dann)
The real issue here is that Labour’s war chest is almost empty. It used to have lots of wealthy, Labour supporting donors, but the current version of the Labour Party is so toxic, it has driven them into the arms of their opposition.
No Andrew the real issue is that Nicola is full of it on this issue
Keep telling your self Andy capped, full of lies.
Nobody would expect a union boss to support National so why does any one find it hard to except rich people will support a party from the right. Both of these extremes are only one vote so it does not mean that much as surely no one believes what they say on tye adverts and bill boards will be done .
Trevor surely that’s the point – why does Willis think denying it will convince us it is not true?
So National is the party that favours the wealthy and powerful.
How is this news or surprising? Remember Jimmy Bolger’s ‘worship the rich’?
The sad thing is that Labour is NOT the party that helps the poor and vulnerable.
Comments are closed.