BLOGWATCH: How desperate are Labour? Read this Standard post and gasp!

36
2403
The Standard's Editorial Team

We have real problems on the Left if this gasp inducing post on The Standard is anything go by.

Their argument is ‘always look on the bright side of life’ and claim that there is no depression in NZ.

It’s so fucking ludicrous and shows how blind tribal Labour have become.

Greg Presland is a member of the Professional Managerial Class who now dominate Labour and sees woke virtue signals as the mission for Labour now, not the economic bread and butter issues that impact the poor.

Hilariously he brings up hate speech before mentioning economics, something he actually gets chastised for in the comments section of his own post.

- Sponsor Promotion -

I believe an ACT/National Government would be the most dangerous far right experiment this country will have seen since Roger Douglas, and because of that, we must get Labour back in power, but to refuse ,as Presland does, to see the pain outside his own privileged economic bubble shows how difficult it will be when people like him have so much influence in the Party.

Labour have failed to be transformative and have failed us on the issues that truly matter.

As TDBs own Professor Susan St John points out

The Government’s media response to the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) Child Poverty Report 2022 proudly claims “Child poverty declines in spite of COVID” .

Sure, material hardship rates for many children improved between 2013-21, thanks to government measures, rising employment rates, improving wages.  BUT the MSD report itself is at pains to say that these results do not reflect anything like the full extent of the pandemic period. Let’s not forget too, the huge efforts of the proliferating private charities and foodbanks, which while utterly necessary, remain a disturbing indicator of policy failure.

The government’s media release has a misplaced congratulatory tone. 

    • Government policy means child poverty measures improve during COVID-19 in contrast to them rising sharply during the GFC.
    • There are 145,000 fewer children in hardship in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic than when hardship numbers peaked after the GFC in 2011.
    • There were 70,000 more jobless households with children during and immediately after the GFC then during COVID-19.
    • Rates of hardship for Māori rose to 36% after the GFC, and 47% for Pacific people. These have since dropped to 20% and 24% respectively. This means there are 40,000 fewer Māori children in poverty now than there were after the GFC.
    • Around the GFC (2007 to 2011) less than 40% of households with children said they had enough income to cover the basics. This is now 61%. That’s 150,000 more households who can meet their basic needs now.

There are no health warnings in the Government’s media release about how to interpret the data and the limitations of the figures. The data for the latest MSD report was collected during the period July 2020 and June 2021, with reference to the previous 12 months. A family interviewed early in the piece would be reporting income for the 2019/2020 year. So much of the data is prior to the full Covid pandemic, and does not capture anything at all of the severe impact the 2021 lockdown had on low-income families, or the recent devastating cost of living pressures. Remember too, thousands of worst-off children live in emergency accommodation such as motels and garages and are excluded from the survey on which the child poverty report is based because their families have no residential address.

The media release appears tone deaf to the intense pressures that private charities have been constantly reporting in 2022, the thousands of children in damp, cold housing with blighted life trajectories, the crippling rent rises and the entrenchment of the foodbank industry on scale unimaginable to most New Zealanders. The claims on the one hand that child poverty has declined, and the on-the ground reports from those coping with the covid and cost of living fallout on the other suggest the poverty indicators relied on in the Child Poverty Reduction Act are not fit for purpose in times of crisis. 

The government would be advised to pay close attention to what the report actually says. Even though families on average appear to do better from 2013, the report shows 120,000 children were still in hardship in the 2021 survey. Of these, around 60,000 children were living in severe hardship (and remember those in motels or other make do accommodation like garages were not in the survey). 

…as TDBs own John Minto points out

  • Why are the number of children living in grotty motels STILL INCREASING?
  • Why is the number of children living in cars STILL INCREASING?
  • Why are the number of children in tents STILL INCREASING?
  • Why is Labour still ONLY FUNDING 1600 new IRRS places (for state house and social housing providers combined) each year for the more than 24,000 families on the state house waiting list?
  • Why does Labour still think it’s OK to keep the proportion of state house at just 3.6% of total housing stock when it was 5.4% in 1990?
  • Why has Labour not instigated an industrial-scale state house building programme such as the first Labour government did in the 1930s? (Labour then built 3,500 state houses each year – equivalent to 10,000 today on a population basis)
  • Why is the government planning to sell 55 to 60% of crown land in Auckland to private property developers when we have a housing catastrophe for low-income New Zealanders?

…let’s also add the appalling decision to remove Children’s Commissioner oversight from Oranga Tamariki.

How about the million a day being spent to kettle beneficiaries into dangerous motels?

How about the 30% jump in demand from Food Banks?

Look, ACT and National ARE NOT the solution and this Blog will fight tooth and nail against those right wing arseholes, but to pretend as Presland does that Labour have done anything meaningful on the economic justice issues that matter as opposed to woke wank virtue signals is simply delusional and shows how out of touch Presland as a member of the Professional Managerial Class has become.

If Presland is the best defence the Left have, we are in bigger trouble than I feared.

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

36 COMMENTS

  1. This ‘Standard’ columnist is still selling the con that unemployment is “low”.

    Only 56% of the working age population were in regular employment last quarter (i.e. full time permanent).

    The last number I saw for the number of homemakers, students and disabled came to around 9% total.

    39% of the workforce either unemployed, or scraping by on irregular odd jobs!

    And consider the poor quality of the jobs. The high wage manufacturing and mining jobs were deliberately destroyed. Nobody cares if you created garbage waitressing and tour guide jobs: they want their decent jobs back, at the same high rates of the early 1970s.

    • You’re on the money @ Kristoff. Definitions of (un)employment result in counting up those un/employed. The stats. Define (un)employment differently and different understandings emerge.

  2. Ironic, isn’t it? This Government makes a big song and dance about mis/disinformation, yet could be accused of spouting it.

    The limitations of the figures re the data for the latest MSD report and how Labour presented that data seems very misleading to say the least.

    • Lies, damned lies, and statistics. Too right @ Chairman. Governments, think tanks and researchers who should know better have used statistics to bolster their ideological positions for eons. Yes, misleading to say the least. At its root is the operationalization of constructs, bit of a mouthful but in everyday terms, how stuff like ‘(un)employment’, ‘literacy’, ‘poverty’, almost anything you can think of, are defined, subsequently counted (with the assumption of what can be counted is in fact what counts), and presented as evidence. No wonder there’s a battle for truth.

      • Thanks Bozo for tying up present ec/pol methods in a neat package – good for a takeaway to chew on at home.

  3. I got called out on that blog as an act member by a commentor for saying that universal programs that everyone rich and poor get are the most electorally popular policies that left wing govts introduce.

    Also because universal programs aren’t targeted and single people not just families get them they are preferable to my generation which are majority childless I’m a neoliberal.

    Apparently…. Advocating for Keynesian economic policies…. Makes me …a supporter of Milton Friedman because….. Apparently targeted neoliberal spending is more left wing than old school universalism…

    Boy the PMC are delusional in their ivory towers.

    • Yes the PMC have become delusional, and Labour are their political wing, it’s how you get a 700million dollar bike bridge cos cars bad -ok’d while thousands are in poverty and you still blow 50 million (on good clean PMC anti car Labour voting consultants) cancelling it and still the people are in poverty.
      Far, far beyond a joke.
      I’d like to see some enquiries in to where our money has gone with this government.

    • Also ignorant, they dont even know the history of the left or how out of wack their ideology is with the founding aims of the labour party. In their view anyone who was centre left or moderate left is now considered right wing.

  4. One of the tribal over at The Standard has just accused Martyn of turning into another anti-Labour troll due to him putting up this post. How pathetic.

Comments are closed.