
One of New Zealandโs largest trade unions is welcoming a private memberโs bill that could give security to thousands of labour-hire workers.
Labour MP Kieran McAnultyโs Employment Relations (Triangular Employment) Amendment Bill was pulled from the ballot on Thursday and will ensure workers in triangular employment can enjoy collective agreement coverage and personal grievance rights.
Triangular employment is where an employer, for example a labour-hire company, contracts the services of their employee to a host company, for example a logistics company.
โWeโre very happy this bill was pulled from the ballot and our members are already excited about what its passage might mean for their working lives,โ said FIRST Union spokesperson Lisa Meto Fox.
โPeople stuck in triangular employment often donโt know whether theyโre working tomorrow, or next week, or next month. Thereโs no security. But this bill could go a long way towards ensuring people are guaranteed work under a siteโs collective agreement. This could help lift thousands of families out of poverty and insecurity.โ
FIRST Union often negotiates โautomatic conversionโ rights in collective agreements where, after a set period of time, labour-hire workers on a site are converted to employees.
โWeโre supporting Kieran McAnultyโs bill to first reading and weโre calling on Parliament to send it to select committee. Weโll be submitting in favour of including the bill as part of the governmentโs wider employment reform agenda.โ
โIf this bill passes itโs going to mean companies like The Warehouse are going to have to change their practices,โ said Meto Fox.
Last year the Employment Court made a landmark decision finding it is likely that a host company may be deemed the employer instead of the labour-hire company where โthe work is for an indefinite duration, is expected to be provided and is expected to be performed by the individualโ and โa significant degree of supervision, control and direction is exercised by the host [company]โ.


This bill sounds great. What are the chances it’ll make it through parliament and become law?
In one of those conversation you have while drinking tea after a meeting a couple of lawyers and myself all thought that the provision in the ERA about not rolling over fixed term agreements continually with out very good reason would probable cover this if some one could just come up with the funds to take a case all the way through to the supreme court.
Its interesting the amount of antiunion rhetoric being expressed on the Stuff website. I notice many are employees not employers…
Comments are closed.