Sean was the dipshit who made the choice to make his shit podcast subject to the BSA by… broadcasting it on radio.
https://business.scoop.co.nz/2024/08/14/collaboration-between-radio-aotearoa-and-the-platform/
His choice. His problem

Yep good question however Winston DID get his knickers in a twist if you have been following TDB and Winston never made a complaint to the BSA, so we’ll never know Observer.

Were you keen to make a complaint yourself?

Is the alternative of letting people put audio or video of themselves saying whatever they want on the internet a good thing then? The BSA has a set of standards and broadcasting is a fair way to describe the distribution of content on the internet. See below for a link with a better explanation
https://theculturalmarxist.substack.com/p/on-political-violence?publication_id=2762244&post_id=176265069&isFreemail=true&r=554rzo&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

So if someone got their panties in a twist about something said on “The Bradbury Group” (and it’s the internet so someone will always be “offended” by something), that’d mean the BSA would have to investigate that as well.

Aside from the techincal aspects of the law, If you make The Platform subject you also by default make thousands of streams, podcasts, blogs and online shows subject. All must pay a levy and broadcast the complaints procedure by law.

As an example everytime Bomber saus something mean about Winston or Seymour complaints would be made to the BSA and it becomes a shit show