Home Blog Page 2320

National burn forestry industry: Where we make jobs in the next Government

2

Burning-forest-picture-2-1-

What the hell did the forestry sector ever do to the National Party? I know one thing they did – they ensured that at the end of the first Kyoto commitment period New Zealand was in the black despite ever increasing gross greenhouse gas emissions. It was only the fact that we planted enough trees to offset those emissions that taxpayers didn’t end up with a massive bill given the National Government’s winding back of low-carbon policies, gutting of the emissions trading scheme (ETS), and active promotion of carbon intensive industries and practices. The National party should be thanking forestry for digging them out of a hole.

Instead you could be forgiven for thinking that the National Party has some kind of vendetta against the forestry sector.

Since 2011 National has sat on its hands as a flood of cheap international units (“Kyoto units”) – units which are banned or restricted in every other scheme around the world – has collapsed the price of the New Zealand Unit (NZU). The impact on the post-1989 forestry sector has been enormous. Foresters have exited the ETS and replanting has all but dried up. And all this before we even consider the “wall of wood” due to come on-stream in the next few years.

It’s been an issue that the Labour party has raised consistently over the last few years – in the House, in select committee, and through SOPs during the committee stages of the last ETS bill. I also have a members bill in the ballot to restrict these cheap units. This is hardly a new issue.

So when we were presented with an omnibus bill during Budget urgency which included what was described to us as a “non-controversial” change to the Climate Change Response Act we thought at first blush it sounded pretty reasonable. As Minister Craig Foss said in his first reading speech:

Part 2 of this bill corrects an unintended consequence in the operation of the New Zealand emissions trading scheme. It stops reregistration arbitrage, which arises from the price difference between international Kyoto units and New Zealand Units. Urgent intervention is required to prevent the significant reputational and integrity risks and fiscal cost to the Crown that this may create.

Basically the change was purported to stop foresters registering their forests with the ETS (and collecting NZUs for the carbon their forest sequesters), de-registering (and surrendering much cheaper Kyoto units to meet the de-forestation liability thereby pocketing the difference), then re-registering and playing the whole game over and over. This re-registration arbitrage was exploiting a loophole and it definitely needed to be fixed.

However that’s not what the Bill actually did. It could have simply stopped a forester from being able to register more than once. Simple. Or the Government could have done what the forestry sector has been calling on them to do since 2011 – restrict these cheap Kyoto units across the board – which would have solved this and many other problems.

Instead what the bill did was stop post-1989 foresters from being able to access Kyoto units to meet their de-registration liability at all. This applies not only to the foresters who were gaming the system by engaging in re-registration arbitrage; it also captures those who are exiting the scheme for genuine reasons with no intention of re-registering. It doesn’t stop re-registration arbitrage; it stops all arbitrage.

And in isolation that seems fair enough. Except that when it comes to National’s mates in the industrial sector, who were awarded a free allocation of NZUs to meet the bulk of their emissions when they entered the scheme, there are no such restrictions. They have been given a free pass to continue to engage in arbitrage without restriction.

The Minister claimed the bill was about reducing fiscal risk to the Crown but when you consider that the fiscal risk associated with post-1989 foresters is estimated to be between $11-66 million compared to $107 million for other holders of NZUs (based on the Government’s own methodology) – you have to ask yourself why this sector was not only the first but  is the only sector targeted.

Minister Foss’ comments in the first reading are ridiculous for a number of reasons. Firstly this isn’t an “unintended consequence in the operation of the New Zealand emissions trading scheme”. It is the result of a very deliberate decision made by National to not restrict cheap Kyoto units. And “urgent intervention” was required back in 2011 when the forestry sector first raised this issue with the National Government.

The retrospective nature of the legislation also means that any foresters who were intending to de-register and had purchased Kyoto units to meet their obligations are now stuck with them. They will also have to purchase NZUs to replace them. The Government could have made the restriction apply only to future imported Kyoto units but chose not to.

This change had no consultation, no select committee process, and was dropped on the sector without warning. This is despite the Ministry for Primary Industries routinely promoting the re-registration arbitrage process – including tips on how to de-register and re-register under the ETS – in their Sustainable Forestry Bulletin as early as February this year.

This change does nothing to address the actual problem which is the significant price differential between the NZU and Kyoto units and the unrestricted flow of these cheap units into our ETS.

Labour has consistently supported the forestry sector and iwi in calling for a restriction on these cheap Kyoto units for years. But the restriction must apply to all participants – not only forestry. Anything else is just cronyism. Plain and simple.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Govt admits taxpayers subsidising millions of dollars of pollution under ETS

0
Source: Green Party – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Govt admits taxpayers subsidising millions of dollars of pollution under ETS



It has been revealed in Parliament today that taxpayers are paying millions of dollars for companies to pollute under the Government’s failed emissions trading scheme (ETS), the Green Party said today.

“The Government has admitted that hundreds of millions of dollars of carbon units have been handed out for free to big polluters, who have profited from them at the taxpayers’ expense,” said Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman.

“Climate Change Minister Tim Groser was explicit that the ETS was designed to allow companies to ‘maximise their fiscal position’.”

Last year, 34 million free units were given away to large polluting companies under the ETS, worth, on average current market value, $165 million. A total of $1.36 billion worth of taxpayer-funded units have been given away between 2010 and June 2014.

The companies then surrender much cheaper international units to meet their emissions obligations under the ETS, either banking the more valuable NZ units or selling them for profit.

“The Government may have closed the legal loophole allowing post-1989 foresters to manipulate the ETS, but this leaves other sectors still gaming the system, and being funded by taxpayers to pollute,” said Dr Norman.

“Carbon traders tell us some of these companies have been making huge profits, with zero positive impact on the climate.

“Meanwhile this is all top secret. Taxpayers are not entitled to know which companies are receiving the hand-outs and to what tune.

“This is another example of National’s cosy back-room dealings with big business at the expense or ordinary New Zealanders.

“The Government needs to come clean and admit taxpayers are basically paying for these companies to profit from trashing the climate.”

According to the Government’s own figures, New Zealand’s net emissions are projected to rise by 50 percent in the next decade.

Experts have said the ETS is holding back New Zealand’s transition to a low carbon economy.

“The ETS has been a monumental failure. It was designed to incentivise emission reductions, investment in clean technology, and the planting of trees,” said Dr Norman.

“It has done none of these things, yet taxpayers continue to pick up the bill for it.”

The claims and opinions made in this statement are those of the release organisation and are not necessarily endorsed by, and are not necessarily those of, The Daily Blog. Also in no event shall The Daily Blog be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the above release content.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Laila Harre to be the new leader of the Internet Party

18

laila

Boom, it’s been leaked by the NBR, so the secret is out. Laila Harre will be the new leader of the Internet Party? So if this works the way we hope it will, Hone Harawira, Laila Harre, Annette Sykes and John Minto will be in Parliament.

Where’s all that left wing angst and screams of sell out now?

You wanted a game change? Here’s your game changer!

Now let’s go beat John Key.

Game on.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Parental Leave Payments to Increase in July 2014

0
Source: Unite Union – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Parental Leave Payments to Increase in July 2014

Parental Leave Payments to Increase in July 2014

Families with new born babies can expect an increase in parental leave payments from 1 July this year.

The maximum amount of parental leave payment for eligible employees will increase from $488.17 to $504.10 a week. To work out if you’re eligible for paid parental leave, and what payment you’ll receive, use our online paid parental leave calculator.

The minimum amount of parental leave payment for self-employed persons will also increase, from $137.50 to $142.50 a week.

The maximum rate is reviewed every year to account for any increase in average weekly earnings.

Under the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987, parents eligible for the scheme are entitled to up to 14 weeks paid leave at a rate calculated on the basis of their average weekly earnings.

Please also note that the following changes to parental leave were announced in Budget 2014:

  • Paid parental leave will be extended from 14 weeks to 16 weeks from 1 April 2015, and then to 18 weeks on 1 April 2016.
  • The Parental Tax Credit will be increased from a maximum of $150 per week for eight weeks to a maximum of $220 per week for 10 weeks from 1 April 2015.
  • The eligibility for paid parental leave will also be extended from 1 April 2016 to people in less-regular jobs and workers with more than one employer and to “Home for Life” caregivers and people with similar permanent care arrangements.

More information about Paid Parental Leave, including forms and sample letters are available online.

The claims and opinions made in this statement are those of the release organisation and are not necessarily endorsed by, and are not necessarily those of, The Daily Blog. Also in no event shall The Daily Blog be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the above release content.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Chch residents deserve assurances over asbestos

0
Source: Green Party – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Chch residents deserve assurances over asbestos



Thousands of Christchurch residents whose homes have been repaired are now in the dark as to whether their homes have had some form of asbestos contamination.

The Government must take responsibility for the uncertainty around potential asbestos contamination in Christchurch and reassure residents by testing the potentially affected homes, the Green Party said today.

Thousands of Christchurch residents may have been exposed to asbestos due to lax management of asbestos by Fletchers EQR during the first two and a half years of the Canterbury rebuild. Fletchers EQR, who is in charge of the Canterbury Home Repair Programme on behalf of the Earthquake Commission (EQC), is currently being investigated by WorkSafe about its handling of exposure to asbestos, however the investigation only applies to the occupational exposure and does not take into account the wider public health concern of homeowner exposure.

“It’s unacceptable that tens of thousands of Christchurch residents are now left worrying about potential exposure to asbestos,” Green Party Christchurch spokesperson Eugenie Sage said today.

“While Fletchers is now applying stricter guidelines to potential asbestos contamination, the issue was not effectively managed in the first two and a half years of the rebuild process.

“Thousands of Christchurch residents whose homes have been repaired are now in the dark as to whether their homes have had some form of asbestos contamination.

“The Government must take responsibility and look after the concerned residents.

“The investigations by WorkSafe are only focusing on the building industry and occupational exposure. No one is looking at homes which have been repaired.

“EQC should have set better standards from the start. It now needs to offer to retrospectively test homes that are potentially affected, to provide reassurance to those residents.

“As a first step, EQC should undertake testing of a wide, representative sample of the homes that were subject to repair before the more stringent guidelines were in place. This would help identify the potential scale of the problem.

“Christchurch has been through enough. EQC should remove the burden of worrying about potential asbestos contamination from the shoulders of these residents.”

The claims and opinions made in this statement are those of the release organisation and are not necessarily endorsed by, and are not necessarily those of, The Daily Blog. Also in no event shall The Daily Blog be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the above release content.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

A brief word on Sue Bradford leaving MANA

20

200px-Sue_Bradford

As the person who first reached out to Sue Bradford for a coffee to discuss joining the MANA Movement over 3 years ago, I have mixed feelings about her decision to resign from the Party now MANA has reached an alliance with the Internet Party.

I have a huge amount of respect for Sue’s passion and activism, she is a taonga for the Left, but where she and I part ways is in strategy and tactics.

MANA could have entered this election with the minimal resources and up hill battle they always wage to gain representation, or they could look at an alliance with someone who could open up another electorate while providing technological upgrades and resources.

The alliance also has the potential of gaining far more real gains for MANA voters if they have the numbers to negotiate hard with Labour post election.

I just don’t believe we have the luxury of telling the 285 000 kids in poverty that we preferred principled opposition than pragmatic co-operation.

I wish Sue well. She is family, and she always will be.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

A brief word on the Maori Party reaction to Internet MANA

24

6a00d83451d75d69e2017c31835cf8970b-800wi

Stuff reports…

Maori Party leader Te Ururoa Flavell said the merger was “seriously wrong” and undermined the Maori seats.

“I’m pretty brassed off to be truthful . . . those seats were set up for our people, our people have come through hard times to get those seats and to utilise them to bring somebody in who is questionable about their knowledge about things Maori and indeed Te Tai Tokerau is a bit of a slap in the face for Maori voters.”

…I’m sorry what? The despicable and disgusting manner Te Ururoa Flavell and the Maori Party went about expelling Hone and then sucking up to National for almost 6 years gives them no moral high ground to attack MANAs strategic decision to enter into an alliance with the Internet Party.

What’s the point of ‘sitting at the table’ when John Key has already privatised and sold off that table? The dead rats the Maori Party have had to swallow for their best friend forever status with John Key gives Te Ururoa Flavell no credibility in criticising MANA for this alliance. The Maori Party are now in their death throws as a political movement, what exactly have they done with these seats Flavell claims are for his people? Other than exploding Maori poverty and unemployment, the Maori Party have done bugger all because their decision to suck up to National has provided them with nothing.

The Maori Party have Stockholm syndrome when it comes to John Key, they have their own relationship issues to deal with, perhaps that’s where Flavell needs to turn his attention before he starts critiquing MANA?

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Cry for our beloved country, cry

10

889ba624a9a6d2ccbc81a75dfdbcbff35f03ff2d

A sense of national identity is forged through our response to historical challenges. What it is to be a ‘Kiwi’ has been developed through colonisation and wars (we’re ANZACs), through leadership in the face of emerging and destructive technology – nuclear arms, (we’re nuclear free and proud of it), and through the domestic contests we’ve won about apartheid, homosexual law reform, abortion and women’s rights.
Many of us on the left of the political spectrum stand proud for the fact that women won the vote here, first; that we sent the navy to the Pacific to oppose nuclear testing; that we stood up to America against nuclear ships; we showed solidarity against apartheid and that we implemented many laws giving equal rights and freedoms to others regardless of their gender, sexual orientation or religious beliefs. We’ve been proud to be clean and green – or at least aspiring to be. We’ve been proud of our egalitarian society and incremental progressive political development. We had a noble, principled foreign policy stance that saw us as peacekeepers; independent and not caught up in other peoples’ wars. We stood up to other nations against whaling in the Southern Oceans.

Unfortunately, our sense of national pride and righteousness is becoming quickly sullied. What sort of country have we become?

‘Our New Zealand’ is now a nation where the gap between the rich and the poor has grown faster than ever before in any other place and at any other time. Economic inequality overwhelms any equality before the law. High rates of suicide graphically demonstrate the despair and hopelessness in our society. Our environmental standing is grim with what we’re doing to freshwater, wetlands, high country habitats. Extinctions march onward with only token Governmental response. Christchurch is bulldozed under residents’ feet. Homelessness affects thousands. Any sort of home ownership, much less the quarter acre Pavlova paradise, is now out of the reach of so many while a privileged few own more than one house. Access to tertiary education and upward advancement through studying as an adult has been reduced. Private indebtedness means we’re owned by foreign banks. Corporatised and privatised infrastructure is operated for commercial gain not as a public service – no wonder over 40,000 people had their power cut off last year. Our fragile sovereignty has been traded off through World Trade Organisation negotiations and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Our nation which once stood righteous on foreign policy, now sucks up to and actively participates in America’s spy networks, drone strikes and imperialistic invasions.

These days, those of us on the left are desperate for a change in government if not in political-economic order. Our sovereign integrity is a myth. John Key’s ‘comfort’ with the erosion of our moral statehood is embarrassing and scary. This is not the New Zealand we had, nor the New Zealand we aspire to.

Cry, for our beloved country, cry.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Fluency in the language of violence: The toxic masculinity of the Isla Vista Campus massacre

27

unnamed
I have spent the last few days shedding tears and ringing my hands over the Isla Vista Campus Killings. I am horrified and angry, but I am not surprised by it. One of my earliest memories is of a man touching me without my permission because he thought he had ownership over my body; he thought I owed him something. I was only 3. Sadly there has been more occasions in my life when I was not quick enough to avoid the hands and fingers of men.

Elliot Rodger, the 22 year old male responsible for the Isla Vista Massacre at a Californian college campus, believed that women owed him something too. He believed women owed him sex and love, and when Elliot Rodger did not get what he wanted he killed 6 people: he stabbed his three flatmates before moving on to a shooting rampage in which he killed two women and one other man. Rodger reserved special hate for two groups: the women he says denied him sex and kept him a virgin, and the men they picked over him.

There is a trail of evidence left by Rodger that paints a picture of a truly disturbed young man struggling to fit into the narrow confines of western masculinity. Before Rodger committed his massacre he published online his 140 page manifesto which begins like a memoir. This quickly dissolves into a misogynistic diatribe and ends with a final solution he called, The Day of Retribution. Rodger declared he was going to purify the world and believed women should be herded up and imprisoned in concentration camps, to be ‘eventually starved to death’. In his Manifesto he also stated ‘Women are like a plague that need to be quarantined’. Rodger’s final solution was the obliteration and erasure of women everywhere.

The Youtube video Rodger uploaded hours before he went on his rampage is titled Retribution. In it he claimed he was going to prove himself the ultimate “alpha male” and take revenge on all the “blonde sluts” and “popular kids” who had socially or sexually rejected him:

“Tomorrow is the day of retribution, the day in which I will have my revenge . . . you girls aren’t attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it. I’ll take great pleasure in slaughtering all of you. You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one, the true alpha male.”

Elliot Rodger’s murderous thoughts and actions didn’t happen in a vacuum. As my friend John pointed out to me, “Massacres like the Isla Vista killing happen because the social and cultural environment around those men give them permission to hate.”  Although mass shootings like these are rare, the rape and beating of women happens every day. As Eve Ensler’s human rights organisation V-Day has reported; 1 billion women have survived violence globally. The views and ideology that Rodger held in relation to women are widespread; Rodger just took his deep hate of women to an extreme and violent conclusion.

The misogyny that is prevalent within Rodger’s manifesto, his alignment with the Man’s Rights Movement, and the Youtube videos he posted leading up to his attack, can tell us much more about why Rodger massacred 6 people than any arguments over gun control or mental health ever will. These two factors are, simply, not enough.

Boys are taught to dehumanise and devalue women from a young age. One of the biggest insults a boy or a man can receive is to be told that he is a girl. We shame men when they behave in a way that is perceived to be feminine. When boys or men cry, or show emotion, they are often called “girly”, “pussies” or “fags”; all words using femininity as an insult with the underlying belief that being feminine is bad.  These are words that are meant to injure and humiliate. They teach men and boys that the last thing you ever want to be is a girl. Boys are taught that being female is lesser than being male. Tony Porter,  the founder of A Call to Men said in his Ted talk,

 ‘Growing up as boys we were taught men had to be tough, we had to be strong, we had to be courageous, dominating. No pain; no emotions with the exception of anger and definitely no fear. That men are in charge, which means women are not, that men lead and you should just follow and do what we say. That men are superior, women are inferior. That men are strong, women are weak. Women are of less value; property of men and objects, particularly sexual objects. I’ve later come to know this is the collective socialisation of men.’

The hegemonic masculinity Porter speaks of is a reflection of a society in which a toxic masculinity is deeply engrained, and where misogyny like Rodger’s is normalised, a society that encourages social and binary gender-types and stereotypes, in which men are taught to dominate other males and subordinate women.  Rodger constantly referred to women as “animals” of lesser intelligence than himself, throughout his manifesto. He did not see women as human; he viewed them as a disease that needed to be eradicated.

Many boys are being raised to believe they are entitled to a woman’s body. Women’s bodies are treated as a form of sexual currency on which men can calculate part of their worth by a large majority of men. Rodger felt worthless because women denied him this currency, so they had to pay. In his manifesto, Rodger often talked of ‘punishing women’ for denying him sex and the love he felt he deserved and was entitled to.

An individual owes no other individual anything based on the sex they happened to be born as. No women owes any man anything. What is owed to women and all people is a safe world to live in, one where you don’t get murdered or raped because of the sex you were born as or become.

Since the massacre, men and women took to twitter and it has exploded with the powerful hashtag #YesAllWomen. It paints a grim but powerful picture of the everyday sexism and violence women face. Many of the tweets spoke to the misogyny women are confronted with daily, but which is often invisible to many men.

Screen Shot 2014-05-28 at 7.23.16 am

Screen Shot 2014-05-28 at 7.24.01 am

 

Screen Shot 2014-05-28 at 7.24.33 am

The hashtag has now got its own twitter profile, and in under two days has over 10,000 followers. There is something going on in our society and it goes far beyond Elliot Rodger massacring 6 people.

The world rightly claims horror and shock at the actions of Elliot Rodger, however if the #YesAllWomen hashtag is anything to go by then it becomes evident that his ideology and misogynistic views are widespread.  A powerful example is the epidemic rape crisis on college campuses; the college town of Missoula, Montana, recorded at least 80 reported rapes over three years as Time Magazine  recently reported.  Colleges and Universities have become a place where young women are being systematically targeted by men in “horrible and violent attacks”. Campus rape does not end in the mass killing of people, but it is mass violence against women – perpetuated by a sense of ownership over women’s bodies, and often a deep hatred of women. As Isha Aran reported for Jezebel,

“…his rhetoric and general view of entitlement to women is engendered by the same anti-women notions that houses the men’s rights movement. We are told not to give attention to the ideology of a deranged killer, but what are we supposed to do when that ideology is as widespread as misogyny?”

The method in which Rodger carried out his violence may be an anomaly, but he is not an aberration.  As Elizabeth Plank argued on Policymic, most school shooters are white men, most victims of school shootings are women, many school shooters target females that have rejected them in the past, and most school shooters exhibit a large sense of entitlement. If news sites such as Fox and other corporate media are the only sources of news you read, you would come to the conclusion that most school shooters are ‘lone madmen’ with “serious mental health issues’ – ignoring the historical pattern which Plank points to in her article. Plank concludes school shootings are often hate crimes against women.

The everyday sexism Rodger has left as part of his digital legacy on social forums and in his Manifesto, speaks also to a much wider culture of normalised hate speech against women. Jeff Perera – who works for White Ribbon, said when interviewed in relation to the massacre; “Most men do not go to the extreme of violence, but it is important to take a look at some young men who are fluent in the language of violence, where this is the way they resolve conflict… we deny young men emotional literacy.”

We raise boys to comply with a system that works against them. Toxic masculinity teaches boys to deny and subjugate some of the most powerful emotions they have; vulnerability, compassion and empathy. Men are taught not to have emotions – with the exception of anger, but I believe that compassion and vulnerability are our greatest strengths; they are our connection to other people. All people, not just men, are taught to distrust our emotions, when emotions have inherit logic and can as Eve Ensler  said, “lead to radical saving action”. The most defiant act we can perform in a world that tells us to disconnect our hearts from our heads, is to stay connected.

This impact is clear in Rodger, who often wrote about feeling isolated, lonely, frustrated and disconnected from the world.  Tony Porter went on to say;

“Stay stoic and quiet, it is part of the unspoken male code: ‘toughen up son’, ‘suck it up’, ‘Man up’ – this is how we learn to process emotion. This is the cause of our emotional illiteracy. No wonder so many men bury their wounds and insecurities in alcohol, drugs and violence.”

There is a code for men and it promises if you acquire certain things – wealth, a six pack, a nice car, expensive clothes – you will obtain women, and status. This code failed for Rodger and in turn he felt the world had failed him. He didn’t get the girl, despite the fact he came from wealth, drove a BMW,  spoke of wearing Armani suits and considered himself “the perfect gentlemen”. Rodger was a white male from a background of privilege and he was promised the world, but as he perceived it, the world had turned on him. As Jeff Perera asserts in his interview “the quickest way to ascend this [failure] is to use violence.” Perera had previously posted on his facebook;

“Young men are sold an idea that the ‘World Is Yours’, and use women as the rungs to climb that ladder towards being ‘The Man’. When some realize they are not allowed to the highest level of the ladder (an elite level of privilege), their rage is placed towards women.”

Sexism and misogyny is not an individual choice. In reality misogyny and gendered violence is largely structural, cultural and systematic. It’s an arrangement of power. A curious thing happened when women started speaking out about the massacre: men, not all, but enough, pulled out the old “not all men…” and “men were killed too” chestnuts. Saying men died in this tragedy does not magically prove it was not a misogynistic act; it means misogyny hurts men too.  The cries of defense are just a way of refusing to acknowledge that the violence is structural, cultural and systematic. It is just a way of denying that a problem exists. A denial that sadly serves the purposes of the brutal system perfectly.

I know there are good men everywhere, and we need more of these good men to take responsibility for the global issue of violence against women. We desperately need more men to join women’s voices in the fight to end violence, not drown them out. It can be as simple as calling bullshit on the dude telling a sexist joke at work that belittles or demeans women. It can start with not accepting sexual harassment of women; a women should be able to walk down the street without being whistled or yelled at.  It can begin with refusing to adhere to the suffocating construct of toxic western masculinity.

These hegemonic systems of patriarchy that normalise violence and oppression need to be disrupted.  What we are seeing is a resurgence of the assumption that somehow patriarchy is positive and empowering for boys – they are being sold an epic lie.  As Bell Hooks said, “

Boys need healthy self-esteem. They need love. Patriarchy will not heal them. If that were so they would all be well.”

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

“We won’t survive this government”

35

JOhn Key - smug

This is a real story, in their own words, that appeared on Facebook a few months ago.  It deserves a wider audience.  This families plight highlights the pressure many families (particularly in Christchurch) are facing.

Hooray for our National Government!

Let me tell you just how well they have supported my family over the last twelve months.

We started off 2013 full of hope that finally things were going to get better. Our children were at new schools and beginning to recover from the trauma of being trapped in the CBD during the earthquake. Having lost our source of income as a result of the earthquake I retrained as a teacher. My husband and I both had teaching jobs. As a beginning teacher and teacher Aide our salaries were very low but at least we were earning.

Strike 1: We were earning but not receiving. Novopay! That wonderful new acquisition of our caring and intelligent government hit us hard. For months we were not paid properly or at all in my husband’s case. This meant that we quickly fell into debt as we had no income. Paying interest on the debt cost us thousands by the end of the year.

Strike 2: My job was a fixed term position for 1 year. That’s ok. I’m sure to find another one… except the government has closed so many Christchurch schools that even many experienced teachers are out of work. So no more jobs available. Way to go government! As if we haven’t suffered enough in Christchurch!

Strike 3: Thank goodness we have a welfare system to help us out in times of trouble. Our incredibly generous government has worked its magic on the welfare system too. Revamping it to make sure those nasty beneficiaries don’t eat into their coffers and mess up the budget surplus targets. So despite being unemployed I am ineligible for a benefit. The reason being that the $379.28 that my husband brings home each week during the school term (as a teacher aide he does not get paid for school holidays) is too much for me to qualify. We can claim an accommodation supplement of $120 per week.

Strike 4: $120 per week accommodation supplement doesn’t go very far in Christchurch thesedays. But if we lived in Auckland we could get more because housing is so much more expensive there. Really? A small 1960’s house with 2 1/2 bedrooms and no insulation is at least $450 a week in Christchurch. A search on Trademe revealed 68 3 bedroom houses available for rent in Auckland for $350 per week or less. There were no 3 bedroom houses for that price in Christchurch. Aah yes there is a housing shortage but the government will not increase the accommodation supplement or do anything to stop the profiteering of landlords. Or make resolving the housing shortage a priority.

Why? Who knows… it seems that people are not as important as those good old market forces – our friends supply and demand.

It is interesting to consider that during a similarly traumatic and destructive national emergency (World War 2), it was illegal to profiteer in this way. In fact in the UK, profiteering like this was akin to treason and carried the death penalty.

Strike 5: So, here we are. A family of two adults and two hungry teenagers and two cats living on $568.28 per week for 40 weeks of the year and $189 per week for the rest when you include our
family tax rebate. Our rent was $470 per week and it was costing $110 per week for my husband to commute to his job. In order to save money we have put the kids into the school where my husband works and moved close by. Our rent is now $450 per week and we are locked into it for the next twelve months. We signed the contract believing that we would be entitled to a benefit that would give me an income and believing that for $450 a week it would be insulated and safe if not beautiful.

We were wrong. We were unable to find anything cheaper despite searching for months. I had applied for a benefit in the first week of February after my previous employment contract ended.

Unfortunately, WINZ were having a tough few months and it took them until the 6th process my application. They declined it. If I had known that it would be declined I would not have signed the tenancy three weeks earlier.

Strike 6: Novopay strikes again! Novopay failed to pay me correctly at the end of my contract so I am still owed a week’s pay. Novopay refuse to talk to teachers and will only talk to the pay officer in the school. I notified the school over a month ago and they say that they have referred the matter to Novopay. Nothing more they can do. Novopay won’t talk to me so I can’t find out where my money is. Stalemate!

So as you can see our wonderful government has taken an ordinary family and crushed it through the accumulated impact of the decisions of their various departments. We survived the earthquake and after three years the physical and psychological injuries are starting to heal. Unfortunately, we won’t survive this government. I don’t know what I can possibly do to change my situation. I have tried every avenue I can think of. Years of hard work all for nothing.

It baffles me that such a government could ever be elected by reasonable people. But then I guess Hitler was elected too… I am sure there are well meaning people in the government somewhere but I wonder if they really appreciate the impact of the decisions that they make on ordinary people.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

A welcome strategic alliance – Mana and the Internet Party

35

9936801I’M VERY PLEASED with today’s announcement of an electoral arrangement between the Mana Movement and the Internet Party.

It’s an arrangement which will bring significant benefits to the Mana Movement and to the country.

The benefits to Mana are that the arrangement means we are more likely to increase our parliamentary representation without any compromise whatever on Mana policies or principles.

Because of confused reporting some people think this arrangement is a merger of Mana and the Internet Party. It isn’t. Instead it’s a strategic alliance (or strategic warfare as a friend puts it) where each party remains separate and independent but we co-operate together to form a group called Internet-Mana which will put forward a joint party list in the election campaign.

The Mana Movement remains independent with our own structure, our own leadership and our own policies.

Mana is still Mana.

Every Mana candidate will stand on the full set of Mana policies. We will argue them on the campaign trail and every Mana member elected will campaign inside and outside parliament for them.

Mana will continue to campaign for those stripped of dignity and self-respect by 30 years of vicious government policies which have made the rich a hell of a lot richer at the expense of the rest of us.

We will continue to fight alongside communities in places like Glen Innes, Maraenui and Pomare which have seen the scaly hands of John Key and the National government steal their homes and trash their communities on behalf of corporate greed.

In other words Mana is still Mana and the leader of the Internet-Mana is Mana leader Hone Harawira! (that’s four Manas in one sentence – you can’t have too much Mana!)

As I said in an earlier blog the main benefit for New Zealand is that it means every vote to get rid of the John Key government will be counted. If the Internet Party were to get say 4.5% of the party vote on its own for example then those votes, potentially up to 130,000 anti-National votes, would be wasted. Not so now.

There will be those who say Mana has only gone into this arrangement for the potential campaign money which the Internet Party can provide. However Mana’s priorities for 2014 have always been the Māori electorate seats and we already have the maximum funds we can spend on those campaigns. (In the three months leading up the election only $25,000 is able to be spent on an electorate campaign)

Where the additional resources will help is in the Internet-Mana party vote campaign. Mana on its own would have struggled to run a strong party vote campaign but now a joint campaign committee will oversee and fund this campaign.

In that earlier blog I also wrote what I thought were the three big questions for Mana as we debated this arrangement with the Internet Party:

    1. Would an alliance enhance or damage Mana as a kaupapa Maori movement?

    2. Would an alliance enable us to gain greater parliamentary representation without compromising our policies or principles?

    3. How would we retain our integrity, and be seen to retain our integrity, in such an alliance?

On the first question the answer is a definite YES. Hone Harawira is the leader of the new Internet-Mana arrangement – enough said for now.

On the second question I hope this blog gives a clear YES.

The answer to the third question is also a definite YES which will become clearer when the Internet Party announces its leader later this week.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Bouquets for the Fiji media from a ‘new wave’ politician

0
fiji BimanPrasad_NFP
Professor Biman Prasad … sound credentials – for democracy and a free media. Photo: Republika Magazine

David Robie also blogs at Café Pacific

FIJI ‘new wave” political hopeful Biman Prasad, a University of the South Pacific academic and economist with some sound democratic credentials, had positive messages for the beleaguered media last weekend.

In a speech to a working group of the rejuvenated National Federation Party, he handed out a few bouquets to the Fiji scribes.

Professor Prasad was at pains to acknowledge the handicaps that journalists faced in Fiji under the Media Industry Development Decree (MIDA), saying that while this remained in force, the 2014 general election in September “cannot be free and fair – period”.

And unlike many other politicians, he actually knows what he is talking about with the country’s media. In 2008, he was co-editor of a Fijian Studies academic journal with the theme “Media and democracy” in Fiji. And this followed a rare Pacific media textbook textbook Media and Development: Issues and Challenges in the Pacific Islands. In both collaborations his partner was then USP head of journalism Shailendra Singh.

fiji_Book-launch_shalen_biman_crop
Professor Prasad (right) with Shailendra Singh at USP. Image: Pacific Scoop

So his commitment to media freedom is sincere and well-argued. But after eight years under this military backed regime, it is hard to think back to the days when Fiji actually had a feisty, truly independent media, arguably the best in the region.

Still, recent signs indicate the media is growing restless under the “chilling” yoke that has kept them more or less in line – at least since the outright censorship era in 2009-2010.

“The media decree with its heavy fines and penalties make it impossible for the country’s journalists to cover issues openly and without fear. It makes it impossible for us to project our messages to our people,” says Prasad.

‘Harsh restrictions’
He praised journalists who “in spite of these harsh restrictions are doing their best to keep our citizens informed”.

“To these journalists, let me say a big vinaka vakalevu. The stakes have rarely been higher and [the] weight on your shoulders so heavy.

“The nation owes you its profound gratitude as you take real risks to help project our messages to Fiji citizens.”

Professor Prasad also pledged to enact a Freedom of Information – “right to information” – bill.

“We no longer live in the dark ages where governments habitually kept secret, public information such as salaries paid to our leaders, and allowances they are paid on foreign junkets,” he says.

Prasad’s great hope is that Fiji’s voters will rise up, shed their fearful responses and become active in the electoral campaign and ballot.

“Our people are still afraid. Our youths are afraid. Our civil servants are afraid, our farmers are afraid, our women are afraid,” he says.

‘Stop the threats!’
“Our businessmen are afraid. They are all afraid of participating actively in the campaign.”

Professor Prasad has also called on the Bainimarama regime to “stop the threats, stop the victimisation, stop the intimidation of anyone – including media from participating and articulating their views” in the lead-up to the election.

But spare a thought for the courageous student journalists of the University of the South Pacific. In a recent edition of their award-winning newspaper Wansolwara, now 19 years old, the students addressed Fiji’s “media woes” and showed their industry colleagues how it is done when it comes to free speech.

In the editorial, Tevita Vuibau asked whether Fiji’s journalists could do more in spite of the decree with its draconian penalties:

“Fear, timidness and meekness – whether real or imagined – are assumed to be the rule by many media practitioners and observers in and out of Fiji, yet exceptions do exist. And with courage, skill and determination, the press can and will do more to become a true Fourth Estate.” 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

More social workers needed

1
Source: Green Party – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: More social workers needed



The report shows that CYFs is not able to look after the children who are currently on its books, let alone the extra work the Government wants it to do through its vulnerable children’s action plan

The Green Party is pledging increases to funding for front line social workers in the wake of a review showing that frontline child protection staff can’t keep up with the number of children needing help.

A joint Public Service Association and Child Youth and Family review has found social workers are weighed down by paper work and there are not enough of them to deal with the current demand.

“The report shows that CYFs is not able to look after the children who are currently on its books, let alone the extra work the Government wants it to do through its vulnerable children’s action plan,” Green Party children spokesperson Holly Walker said.

“Much more effort and money is needed to support social workers in the work they’re already doing.”

The report also recommended CYFs adopt a national data collection system.

“At the moment there is no ability to gather national data either on caseload, or on the number of children abused in CYFS care. That’s not acceptable. With good data, we can then make better decisions about where to deploy extra case workers.

“It’s very concerning that there are simply there not enough trained social workers to deal with the current number of kids who need help and that those that are there spend too much time on paper work,

“If the Government really was interested in helping at risk kids it would hae given front line staff what they need to do their job of looking after these children.

“The National Government is allergic to employing more public servants, but for the sake of at-risk kids it must get over that, and employ the people they need to be kept safe.”

The claims and opinions made in this statement are those of the release organisation and are not necessarily endorsed by, and are not necessarily those of, The Daily Blog. Also in no event shall The Daily Blog be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the above release content.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Asbestos: biggest workplace killer – Government must do more now

0
Source: CTU – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Asbestos: biggest workplace killer – Government must do more now

Printer-friendly version

The CTU is deeply concerned about the exposure to deadly asbestos Christchurch rebuild workers are experiencing. Fletchers, the major contractor responsible for a significant part of the rebuild project, will be in court on Friday facing possible charges for not complying with the law and keeping workers safe.

“Asbestos causes cancer.  No exposure is safe. We have known this fact since at least 1986 when the World Health Organisation declared just that. Demolition workers, tradespeople, carpenters and householders may have been needlessly exposed to asbestos fibres in Christchurch. The Government should have been proactive in its approach to the presence of this known workplace carcinogen. The Government has a moral obligation to take urgent action. This should include monitoring the people who have been exposed, and compensating them if needed,” said CTU Policy Director, Bill Rosenberg.

“New Zealand is out of step with many other countries around the world as we fail to have a plan in place to eliminate asbestos. Banning all importation of asbestos products is a critical step. In Australia and the U.K., asbestos products are strictly banned at the border. Urgency should be given to upgrading the asbestos regulations rather than waiting until April 2015. There should be notification of work with asbestos, employers should be required to keep records of working with asbestos, and buildings known to contain asbestos should be registered,” Rosenberg said. The CTU listed twelve action points on asbestos.

“The Government has a goal of reducing workplace accidents by 25 percent by 2020. It must also have a goal around asbestos. The European Parliament has agreed to ‘eradicate’ asbestos by 2028.” Rosenberg said. “In New Zealand we should have a national plan to eliminate asbestos from buildings by 2030. The aim should be to completely eradicate asbestos from all workplaces,” said Rosenberg.

“MBIE estimates that 170 deaths occur a year from asbestos-related diseases, and that this will rise to over 300 as the results of the ‘asbestos boom’ of the 1970s make themselves felt. Even 170 is double the number of workplace deaths each year from injury – a number which is itself far too high. We can and must prevent more deaths in future decades,” said Rosenberg.

“The risks have been known to employers and government for thirty years. There is no excuse for putting off decisive action any longer.” Rosenberg said.

The NZCTU recommends:

1. An immediate priority to upgrading the asbestos health and safety regulations currently these are slated to come into force alongside the proposed Health and Safety at Work Act in mid-2015.  This is too far away and the Minister of Labour should regulate as quickly as possible.  Further amendments can be made following more detailed consultation.

2. As MBIE has proposed, the regulations should be based on the Australian approach which includes a presumption that asbestos is present in the built environment and therefore workplaces, and lowering the exposure limits which are out of line with international standards, and require more prescription in relation to removal work.

3.There should be mandatory licensing and training for those working with asbestos (both maintenance and demolition);

4.The distinction between friable and non-friable asbestos is unhelpful given the possible deterioration of previously non-friable asbestos.  This should be removed.

5.A complete ban on the importation of asbestos-containing products should be implemented.

6. A National Plan to eliminate all asbestos containing material from the built environment by 2030.

Notification and registers

7. All work with asbestos notifiable under workplace health and safety legislation.

8. The Government should take urgent steps to implement a Health Surveillance scheme similar to that used in the United Kingdom for many years.  This requires employers (or all persons conducting businesses or undertakings under the proposed law changes) to keep records of worker exposure to hazards such as asbestos for 40 years to allow tracking of long latency diseases such as those caused by asbestos exposure (see Part 26 of our submission on the Health and Safety Reform Bill).

9. All identified asbestos in Christchurch should be registered. If a building contains asbestos materials the priority should be to remove it. If asbestos is identified in a building it should be notified in LIM reports.

10. The National Asbestos Registers should be reinvigorated and improved including by making them compulsory.

11. Lung cancer should be registered and recorded in more detail.

12. There should be a system of notification by medical practitioners of all potential asbestos related conditions/exposures including, lung cancer and pleural plaques [asbestosis and mesothelioma are currently recorded].

The claims and opinions made in this statement are those of the release organisation and are not necessarily endorsed by, and are not necessarily those of, The Daily Blog. Also in no event shall The Daily Blog be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the above release content.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Housing affordability worse than ever in Nelson

0
Source: Labour Party – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Housing affordability worse than ever in Nelson

Nelson’s house prices are growing faster than the national median with the only places more unaffordable to buy a house being Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Queenstown for an individual buyer says Nelson-based Labour List MP, Maryan Street.

“A recent report shows that housing affordability worsened in 11 cities in April, with Nelson still in the top five least affordable places to buy a house.

“It now takes 57.3 per cent of one median income to pay the mortgage on a median priced house in Nelson.

“That is up from 54.4 per cent five years ago. Basically, the median income for the typical Nelson buyer is not high enough to buy a median priced house, even if you have got a 20 per cent deposit.

“And it is hard to build up a 20 per cent deposit when rents are as high, as wages as low, as they are in Nelson.

“The Roost Home Loan Affordability Report of 20 May says the median house price in Nelson in April was $370,000. That price was $339,000 in April 2013 which puts annual growth at 9.1 per cent. Five years ago the median was $295,500. This is no good for young families in Nelson.

“The Government needs to commit to two things for families in Nelson: a concerted effort to bring down house prices and a campaign to move up to a living wage. That’s what Labour is committed to. Nothing less will make houses more affordable in Nelson,” said Maryan Street.

The claims and opinions made in this statement are those of the release organisation and are not necessarily endorsed by, and are not necessarily those of, The Daily Blog. Also in no event shall The Daily Blog be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the above release content.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service