Home Blog Page 2118

The Daily Blog Open Mic Thursday 28th May 2015

3

openmike

 

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

Moderation rules are more lenient for this section, but try and play nicely.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

TV 3 show their ‘commitment’ to real current affairs by replacing Campbell Live with Road Cop reruns

6

11329972_10152751847937331_4464837955837234462_n

The final slap in the face to Campbell Live and those NZers who want a 4th estate holding the powerful to account is the news that TV3 will replace Campbell Live with a bloody cop reality show until they can con whatever Journalists they have left to front the bleeding damaged reputation of TV3.

How disgraceful.

Once Campbell Live ends on Friday, the only thing ethical and progressive media consumers can do is boycott TV3.

What a sad day for broadcasting and a sadder day for NZ.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

How Not To Be An Asshole Episode 12 – Friends Never Listen And Strangers Are Interested Ft. Russell Brown

1

https://soundcloud.com/how-not-to-be-an-asshole/episode-12-friends-never-listen-and-strangers-are-interested-ft-russell-brown/s-UgfwS

John Campbell may have quit but never fear because New Zealand’s favorite podcast shows no signs of slowing down.

This episode we talk to media commentator, Russell Brown about drug laws, being a good citizen and how Paul Henry is a charming asshole.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Herald snuff columnist thrown off Air NZ – why you can’t rely on Bob Jones in an emergency

24

1425709_603524293043769_458387448_n-600x481

There is a God.

‘Claps and cheers’ as Bob Jones ejected from Air NZ flight

Passengers applauded when millionaire businessman Sir Bob Jones was booted off a flight in Auckland today.

The captain told those on board the man had disobeyed instructions and it didn’t matter “how important” he was.

Bob Jones is one of NZs great arseholes. His sexist, racist, bigoted hate mongering is the thing of legend. Recently he wrote a snuff column for the NZ Herald in 2013 where he gloated over goading a protester into committing suicide – you read that right, he goaded another human being into suicide and gloated about it. The only thing sicker than that was the NZ Herald publishing it.

His malicious temperament from his fortress of wealth has led to an arrogance so overwhelming that when he was asked if in the event of an emergency that he would help open the emergency door he was sitting next to on an Air NZ flight, he refused to listen.

Who would begrudge helping others in an emergency during a flight?

A NZ vanity columnist, that’s who.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Bearing Honest Witness

15

unnamed

ANDREW DEAN, the twenty-something author of Roger, Ruth and Me, offered a particularly acute response to the TVNZ reporter who asked him if he intended to go into politics. Dean, who subtitled his book about growing up under the influence of Rogernomics and Ruthanasia, “Debts and Legacies”, thought about the question for a few moments and then replied: “I don’t think politics would have me.”

How right he was – and is. There are some people whose approach to the great issues of the day is so heterodox, so untethered to the usual ideological suspects, that in the unlikely event of them ever finding their way into “mainstream” politics, they would very quickly be chewed up and spat out. Sometimes the best you can hope to be is an honest witness.

In a week when memories of the events in Dean’s book (like Ruth Richardson’s “Mother of All Budgets”) have been at the top of many aging journalists’ minds, it was astonishing how little of substance the Leader of the Opposition had to say in response to Bill English’s effort.

Much of the blame for Labour’s woeful performance belongs to Andrew Little himself, but it is also true to say that he was not well served by his advisers. The people in the Leader of the Opposition’s Office should not have been taken by surprise by English’s token gestures towards child poverty. The parliamentary complex is a veritable vortex of rumour and gossip, and the capital city outside rustles with secrets like a hedgehog in the autumn leaves. Opposition staffers should never be surprised by anything a government does – not if their spies are doing their job!

It’s difficult to imagine Helen Clark and her Chief-of-Staff, Heather Simpson, being surprised by the contents of a National Party Budget. Both women boasted extensive networks of friends, allies and informants, and seldom found themselves without a number to call. And, if the worst happened, they could always rely upon Prime Minister Clark’s Press Secretary, the highly-experienced Press Gallery journalist, Mike Munro, to fill in the gaps.

About three weeks ago, another highly-experienced journalist, Richard Harman, was delivering a speech to the NZ Fabian Society on the importance of effective political communication to electoral success. Like Mike Munro, Richard Harman was one of the Parliamentary Press Gallery’s “bigfeet”, a now dwindling breed of journalists who knew everyone and could find out anything. Indeed, the Labour Prime Minister, David Lange, included Harman among the “Three Dicks” (Richard Griffin of Radio New Zealand, Richard Long of The Dominion and Richard Harman of TVNZ) without whose cooperation no political message could be guaranteed to make it through to the voters. It would be interesting to know how many staff from the Leader of the Opposition’s Office were in the Fabians’ audience.

Harman, you can be sure, would never have left Andrew Little so utterly unprepared for what the Finance Minister was about to throw at him. Interestingly, Harman, now back in the Gallery for his “Politiks” blog, was one of the very few journalists to flag the possibility of English doing something interesting with social assistance in the Budget. All of which raises the rather obvious question: “Why didn’t Little invite Harman to be Labour’s Communications Director?”

Possibly because he knew Harman wouldn’t accept the position. The former TVNZ Political Editor is very much “old school” when it comes to crossing the line from journalism to spin-doctoring; arguing that by agreeing to spin for a political party, a journalist instantly devalues everything he or she has written on the subject.

Which is, in its way, reassuring (even if Harman would easily have equalled Monroe in terms of effectiveness!) It also takes us right back to the beginning of this discussion; to Andrew Dean’s shrewd observation that “politics wouldn’t have me”.

Richard Harman’s refusal to “have” the politicians is a vote of confidence in honest witnesses everywhere.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

SkyCity conference centre has all the charm of the East German Stasi HQ

7

This is the East German Stasi Headquarters…

SPECIAL MAIL ON SUNDAY; A file photo dated 05 January 1994 showing the former East German secret police 'Stasi' headquarters in Berlin.
SPECIAL MAIL ON SUNDAY;
A file photo dated 05 January 1994 showing the former East German secret police ‘Stasi’ headquarters in Berlin.

…and this is the SkyCity conference centre…

NZICC_HobsonStreetView_620x310

…they are as equally architecturally charming as an abattoir for the poor. That we have rewritten gambling laws, sold off Government land on the cheap and ended up with an expensive eye sore that has all the nuance of a cargo container is just another upper cut to the face of NZ.

Watching the PM pimp for a Casino is bad enough, but looking at this uninspiring hovel for the rest of our lives is more depressing than the problem gamblers we’ve sacrificed for it.

Unknown

Ugly in every sense of the word.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Maurice, ACT and reneging on the Pike River Mine tragedy – why National are suddenly splintering

35

Well it had to happen at some stage. The great big blue tent of National has suddenly ripped apart due to the new health and safety reforms brought about by the shocking Government incompetence and corporate irresponsibility in the wake of the Pike River Mine tragedy.

Key has been able to manage the drooling far right elements within National by consistently repainting the veneer of moderation around the National Party. His relationship with the Maori Party has provided him political camouflage and the mainstream media consistently refer to him as ‘moderate’. Of course those at the coalface of his draconian welfare reforms and those underemployed working every hour of the day see none of this ‘moderation’ but they have next to no voice and so their pain is ignored and when it is noticed, gets followed by the screaming denouncement of middle NZ…

29052013 OPED cartoon, Thursday, May30, Meals in schools poverty
29052013 OPED cartoon, Thursday, May30, Meals in schools poverty

…Key is ‘moderate’ if you own property or benefit from middle class tax breaks like interest free student loans or working for families. For everyone else, National are a nightmare that never ends.

The reason why Maurice is suddenly making proposals to ACT is because inside National there is deep anger and frustration by the more nakedly ambitious neoliberals that Key isn’t spending as much of his political capital as they want, and this frustration has exploded after they have seen the new health and safety standards.

Let’s remind ourselves of why we needed these new health and safety standards…

600-2mine6-600x400

…29 fathers, brothers, uncles, cousins and friends who went to work one day and never came home.

Their lives are the 29 reasons we needed new health and safety standards.

The bewildering and criminal incompetence of the Government and the industry that allowed safety standards to slip to 18th Century levels were responsible for this horrific act, and the new stricter safety standards that were about to be passed was a response to those deaths.

‘Never again’ we all cried at the time of the Pike River Mine tragedy, well, that ‘never again’ has been reduced to National Party bickering over the impact of keeping workers safe against the interests of their mate bosses who may now be held responsible for the unsafe work places so many NZers die in every year.

National’s need to save their boss mates any obligation for dangerous work places is what is driving this watering down of safety standards, in a functioning democracy this would be decried as venal self interest and punished for such, but in the land of the wrong uptight crowd where we boast about $11.50 pies and making more money from property valuations than actual wages, where the mainstream media spoon feed muddle Nu Zilind ratings fuelled bigotry and prejudice and where our anti-intellecutal cultural cringe welcomes a multimillionaire money trader with open arms, I doubt a ripple will occur.

In John we foolishly trust.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

US bumper sticker

2

CF1IRqHUMAAgg3p

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Jesus or star wars character?

0

CF34NlSWIAAkKLd

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Daily Blog Open Mic Wednesday 27th May 2015

5

openmike

 

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

Moderation rules are more lenient for this section, but try and play nicely.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Mendacities of Mr Key # 13: Kiwisaver – another broken promise

4

.

budget_2015___the_document_Master

.

In the past, when governments broke promises, they were clumsy, heavy-handed, and were punished at the polls.

Political parties and their strategists have learned from those mistakes. Now, when promises are broken, they are done gradually, by incremental steps.  So when the media picks up on it and reports, the public barely notices nor cares.

One such recent broken promise was National’s dumping of the Kiwisaver $1,000 kick-start government contribution, revealed in this year’s Budget.

On 9 July 2008, Key gave a hint as to National’s intentions toward Kiwisaver;

“There won’t be radical changes. There will be some modest changes to KiwiSaver. We will announce that pretty soon.”

On 8 October 2008 – precisely one month before the general election that year – Bill English outlined National’s policy toward Kiwisaver if they became government;

National is proposing three changes to KiwiSaver. These changes will make KiwiSaver fairer, more affordable for current and future members, and more enduring in the long-term.

The three changes National is planning are:

First, a reduction in the minimum contributions demanded of employees.

At the moment, most KiwiSaver members are required to contribute 4% of their income to KiwiSaver. In return, they receive a contribution from their employer equal to 1% of their income. As an interim measure, Labour has allowed some KiwiSaver members to make a more affordable contribution, of 2%. In return they receive an equal contribution from their employer.

National thinks this 2 +2 arrangement is fair and affordable. We disagree with Labour’s plans to ramp-up KiwiSaver over the next three years.

National will make KiwiSaver a 2+2 scheme. Once this is bedded down, however, we will consider offering an alternative 3+3 scheme option, as and when economic conditions permit.

Let me stress that those who want to contribute more than 2% of their wages to KiwiSaver will still have that option. And employers who want to match contributions beyond 2% will still have that option, too.

Second, National will remove the tax credit that is currently paid to employers whose staff are enrolled in KiwiSaver. This will have no effect on the amount of money that goes into New Zealanders’ KiwiSaver accounts.

This subsidy was a transitional tool but it creates a complex money-go-round. It simply doesn’t meet National’s test for effective, disciplined government spending.

I note that the net effect for employers will be small, once they take into account the lower minimum contribution rate.

Finally, National will repeal recent legislation which effectively discriminates against some employees who can’t afford to join KiwiSaver.

However, we will keep a safeguard in place, by amending the KiwiSaver Act to make it explicit that no employee can have their gross taxable pay reduced as a consequence of joining KiwiSaver.

National believes that these three changes to KiwiSaver will make it a fairer, more affordable and more enduring savings scheme.

No mention of cutting the $1,000 kickstart  contribution by government.

In fact, National made no mention whatsoever of removing the $,1000 kickstart contribution at the last election. Claire Trevett at the NZ Herald wrote this informative piece on the issue;

A broken promise is when someone reneges on something they promised to do or not do.

If you were silent, say, about axing the $1000 kickstart payment for new KiwiSaver members, it is not a broken promise, strictly speaking.

But it is an act of bad faith, especially when it happens in the first Budget following an election in which kickstart payments were not mentioned.

The amount of tinkering and tampering with the KiwiSaver scheme since it was announced in 2005 is incredible.

Most of Labour’s changes served to benefit the saver at the expense of the public purse. Not surprising seeing as it began the scheme.

And most of National’s tampering has reduced benefits to the saver and helped the public purse.

Very few other media commentators and columnists have taken National to task for what is undeniably a blatant election broken promise.

Cutting the $1,000 kick-start contribution is short-sighted. Even English had to admit on TV3’s ‘The Nation‘, on 23 May;

“…and New Zealand savings rates are now— have been positive for five years for the first time in decades.”

Our improved saving record has not come about because of anything National has done (despite English’s insistence). In fact, National has undermined every effort to improve this country’s dismal savings record.

In 1975, the then-Muldoon-led National government dumped the previous Labour government’s superannuation savings-policy. This cost our nation an estimated $278 billion (according to Infometrics and  the Financial Services Council).

The 2014 Infometrics report calculated that;

“… a worker on the average wage would have saved $256,000 in the scheme over the past 40 years.”

But Muldoon could not wait to get his meddling hands on the scheme, and like many things he touched, it died.

The same applies to the current Kiwisaver scheme.

The current Key-led National government’s piece by piece  gutting of Kiwisaver – ongoing since 2008 – confirms that no superannuation savings scheme is safe from that party’s political interference.

In this instance, removing the $1,000 kick-start contribution is a direct consequence of National’s ill-conceived tax cuts in 2009 and 2010, which left a gaping hole in National’s taxation-revenue.

In effect, New Zealanders continue to pay for those two unaffordable tax-cuts, whether by cutting back on government services such as bio-security; under-funding social organisations such as Relationships Aotearoa; increasing government user-charges such as Family Court fees, medical prescriptions; taxing children; introducing new taxes, etc, etc, etc.

National was so desperate to win the 2008 general election that despite the Global Financial Crisis, it proceeded with tax cuts that we simply could not afford.

National must now cut every form of expenditure it thinks it can get away with, if it is to escape the prospect of another Budget deficit next year.

We are the ones paying for what, essentially, was an election bribe.

On this occasion, though, our children will end up paying as well.

Addendum1

For more invaluable information, refer to Audrey Young’s excellent piece in the Herald, Why axing kickstart is an act of bad faith.

.

.

.

cheesecolour-tax-cuts

.

.

.

References

Radio NZ: PM defends scrapping of KiwiSaver kickstart

NBR: Key signals ‘modest changes’ to KiwiSaver

Wikipedia: 2008 General Election

Bill English: National’s Economic Management Plan

NZ Herald:  Why axing kickstart is an act of bad faith

Fairfax media: Compulsory super ‘would be worth $278b’

Scoop media: National Reveals Biosecurity Cuts

NZ Family Violence Clearinghouse: Changes signalled to funding of community organisations; Relationships Aotearoa may close

Scoop media: Vulnerable children at risk from Family Court fees increase

NZ Herald: Prescription fees increase

NZ Herald: Budget 2012 ‘Paper boy tax’ on small earnings stuns Labour

Fairfax media: International airfares will rise new departure tax

Additional

NZ Herald:  National denies it misled voters over taxes

Previous related blogposts

Regret at dumping compulsory super – only 37 years too late

Did National knowingly commit economic sabotage post-2008?

Budget 2013: Suffer the little children… to starve

National guts Kiwisaver

The Mendacities of Mr Key # 12: No More Asset Sales (Kind of)

.

.

.

key-surplus-2014

.

.

= fs =

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

“I think, with that, Ron Mark became my favourite Member of Parliament.”

18

Screen Shot 2015-05-27 at 5.11.05 am

See that? Look up. The title to this piece isn’t mine. Instead, it’s a quote from somebody on my wall. That was their reaction to news that NZ First MP Ron Mark told the Government (sotto voce) to “shut the fuck up” during Question Time.

And from everything I’ve seen thus far, they are not alone.

From right the way across the political spectrum – and, even more importantly, from beyond the spectrum entirely – Kiwis are lining up to express their amusement and support for Ron Mark’s STFU-snafu.

Given the way this Government conducts itself – particularly in the House – it’s not hard to see why.

If you’re actively engaged in politics, or have a vested interest in this country having a future … then Ron Mark’s exasperated remark is *exactly* what many if not most of us have longed to be able to tell the Government to do for six and a half grueling years.

I’m sure I speak for many TDB readers when I state that being able to do so *in Parliament* and to their faces would be something of an exercise in wish-fulfillment.

But there’s something far more important going on here. Something revolutionary.

You see, it isn’t just the usual crew of hacktivists, beltway-grognards, and politically enthused party-followers that’re queuing up in droves to express enthusiasm and support for his comment or to brand him a “legend”. (one of the more printable positive epithets I’ve seen being applied in his direction on social media since Wednesday)

It’s the less-engaged if not outright disengaged folk, too.

And that means something.

For four years now, some of the brightest (or, in the case of Labour, bluntest) political minds in the country have grappled with a simple question: How do we get the million-plus Kiwis who’ve stopped participating in politics to re-engage. What do we have to do to excite, inspire, and instill in these people a sense that we *can* actually meaningfully represent them.

I believe Ron Mark’s cracked it.

One of the reasons so many New Zealanders have switched off establishment politics, is because they’re disgusted or disillusioned by the way “business as usual” gets conducted in the House.

And it’s not hard to see why.

Efforts by Opposition MPs to hold the Government to account during Question Time are glibly batted away by insouciantly arrogant ministers who give frivolous non-answers. Serious matters are treated by Government MPs as an excuse for supercilious if not outright super-silly-ous banterMinisters of the Crown hound the leaders of Opposition parties over their fashion choicesThe Speaker plays along.

On the odd occasion Parliamentary proceedings make it into the 6 o’clock news, it’s rarely if ever because there’s some scintillating rhetoric or declamation of national importance being made (although both Winston Peters and Ron Mark have managed notable exceptions to this recently).

Instead, it’s almost invariably because some MP’s run their mouth off with a display of spurious invective that’d be on par or beneath the standard of debate exhibited behind the bike sheds in most intermediate schools immediately before the fisticuffs ensue.

Most of the rest of the time, Government MPs only seem to come to the general public’s attention for the most unedifying of reasons. We all, for instance, now know who Aaron Gilmore is (or, rather, was). Many of us know who a Prominent New Zealander is. Some of us who’ve been around for awhile remember that Judith Collins wasn’t the first Minister this government’s had to let go for using their position to benefit their affiliated private business interests. Even if names like Richard Worth and Pansy Wong are these days mere historical footnotes … the pattern – and the anti-politician prejudices it engenders in the public – are plain for all to see.

Meanwhile, policies proposed by parties other than the Government have not a hope in Hades of making it into law. If National’s not shouting a bill downthey’re voting it down. And on incredibly rare occasions when The Nats don’t even have the numbers to do that (as with Labour’s paid parental leave extension bill) … they just step in and declare they’ll block the legislation by veto regardless. How very democratic.

From the perspective of the layman, the entire Parliamentary process must come across as – in the words of Macbeth – “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing“.

A colossal waste of time, energy, effort, attention spans, and taxpayer funding; whose narcissistic egomanic denizens incontrovertibly seem infinitely more interested in playing silly partisan power-games and stroking their own senses of self-importance rather than actually pulling finger and making the country a genuinely better place.

Into which stepped Ron Mark.

Armed with a precision F-Bomb.

And with it, the power to say what we’re pretty much all thinking.

That’s why what he said was ground-breaking, and grabbed our attention. Not because there was anything terribly scandalous or especially salacious in what was said. (In fact, I’d be enormously surprised if even the most cantankerously conservative curmudgeon couched amidst our Party ranks felt that the elected official in question’s choice of words to be something seriously worth raising official or internal complaint about)

But rather because he had, in four simple words, perfectly captured the way tens of thousands of New Zealanders feel about both our Government – and the way we all too often seem to practice politics in general.

Many of these multitudes don’t vote or actively participate in politics precisely because of this perception that the whole thing’s childish and pointless. They’re that Missing Million we keep talking about, whose non-appearance at each of the last two elections handed National victory on a silver-spooned-mouth platter.

Cutting National’s share of the vote down to size in 2017 is going to require our political class and parties to come down off their many and various high horses in order to engage with and understand these ordinary Kiwi (non-) voters.

And why they’re more thrilled and supportive of an “anti-politician” expressing his frustration with the Government using the regular Kiwi vernacular, than they are with Labour’s continued quixotic drive at being the party of fiscal responsibility.

One of the things I like about Ron Mark is that he does this effortlessly.

The “shut the fuck up” comment was a gaffe. It wasn’t planned, and had it not been for the eagle-eyed sign-language interpreter, it would never have come to the attention of the general public.

It was genuine – and people responded to it in no small part because it felt “real”. And, just as importantly, anti-political.

It showed the public that there’s at least one MP who’s *just as fed up* with the endless silly-buggers done in our name and on our dime as they are. An MP they can support – because unlike the others, he’s there to get something done.

If parties are serious about increasing their share of the vote at the next Election, they would do well to learn from Ron Mark.

“Politics-as-usual”, with all the petty Parliamentary point-scoring, procedural maneuvering and mock-indignation that entails is not the order of the day. “Speaking Truth to Power”, with a veneer of anti-politics, is.

Ordinary people want to see themselves and their views represented in Parliament. Not endless streams of “Beltway bullshit”.

By telling the Government to “shut the fuck up”, Ron Mark has done exactly that.

Good on him.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

GUEST BLOG: Chris Fowlie – Druglawed explores how we got into this mess – and how we can get out

6
unnamed-1
Druglawed is a new documentary that shows how New Zealand got rolled up by the United States into a global War on Drugs and how, ironically, the US is now leading the world in making cannabis legal again.
Four years in the making, filmmaker Arik Reiss managed to snare interviews with a veritable who’s-who of drug policy wonks and pot snobs and has sourced rare and exclusive footage that even well traveled connoisseurs of cannabis may not have seen before. This includes early Kiwi cannabis medicines, Henry Ford hammering on a hemp-built car, fired UK drugs advisor Prof David Nutt, inside a West Auckland cannabis social club called The Daktory, legal New Zealand hemp fields, what the FBI said to Jenny Shipley and what John Key said to a cannabis smoke-in on the steps of Parliament.
Arik was inspired to tell the story of ‘New Zealand Green’ after hearing about police attention paid to Otago NORML‘s4:20 protests while the University condones drinking to excess. He traveled down to Dunedin to film the 4:20protests but by pure chance found himself in the middle of an alcohol-fueled riot. The footage he captured is pure film gold, contrasting the undercover cops wasting time investigating Abe Gray’s peaceful pot protest while Dunedin burns under the influence of legal booze.
Arik traveled far and wide collecting interviews including with myself. I was also happy to support the project with sponsorship from The Hempstore, although I thought at that stage it might just end up on youtube. A deal with TV3 to produce a mainstream-media version called High Time prompted Arik to produce this feature-length docomentary, partly funded with kickstarter. The end result is a thoroughly professional, broadcast-level exploration of the topic that is worthy of its inclusion in film festivals starting with Documentary Edge here in New Zealand.
Divided into ten chapters, Druglawed opens with the story of Suzanne Aubert who was probably the first person to grow cannabis in New Zealand – and now a candidate for beatification. She founded the Sisters of Compassion and manufactured a range of herbal medicines inspired by traditional Maori rongoa. Mother Aubert’s cannabis-based elixers were “a popular drink in New Zealand”, until prohibition was introduced a year after she died in 1926.
The film shows how the global temperance movement was fueled by newspaper magnate Randolph Hearst and explores the threat hemp posed to the oil patents held by US Treasury secretary Andrew Mellon and financier Nelson Rockefeller. I’m not normally one for conspiracies, but Reiss lays it out pretty clearly that these guys saw hemp as a big threat – in particular Henry Ford’s hemp-plastic car that was powered by hemp and corn biofuel. With ‘reefer madness’ propaganda that persists to this day, they got all forms of cannabis banned, including medicinal and industrial uses..
However it was Nixon who really created the modern War on Drugs. It was a handy distraction from his misadventures in South East Asia. US pressure led to the global drug treaties that bind all nations into a prohibitionist framework that considers all drugs “evil” and aims for a “drug free world”. Steve Rolles from Transform (UK) explains how this has excused governments into all sorts of reprehensible behaviour in the name of ridding their countries of drugs.
In New Zealand, Police have pursued pot consumers and providers with particular zealotry, with 381,000 apprehensions for cannabis since 1994, and until recently the highest cannabis arrest rate in the world. This includes prosecuting people with serious conditions who use cannabis to alleviate their symptoms or make life a little more bearable, such as Billy McKee and Dawn Danby, both featured in Druglawed. Their stories were particularly moving – if anything I would like to have seen more from them but that is a minor quibble for such a well made film.
With cannabis a burning topic around the world, there are now a lot of pot documentaries. Druglawed is one of the best and everyone involved should be proud. A sequel is already in the pipeline, with Arik set to interview Raphael Mechoulam, the discover of THC and cannabinoid receptors, visit Israel’s legal medical cannabis farms, and then to Uruguay which recently made cannabis legal.
My verdict is that Druglawed is a great film, a worthy project, and I can’t wait for Part Two!
Druglawed (2015), 99 minutes. English with subtitles. Directed by Arik Reiss, produced by Section 18 Media and BT-Tokyo Media.
Watch the trailer at VimeoDruglawed screens at the Documentary Edge festival in Auckland and Wellington.Download a copy here for $4.20. Buy a DVD from druglawed.com or at The Hempstore in Auckland and Whakamana the Cannabis Museum in Dunedin.
TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The bombing puzzle in the Middle East

10

Screen-Shot-2015-02-16-at-7.46.11-am1

When asked about Saudi Arabia bombing Yemen John Key said that “we understand why they are doing what they are doing” and said he wouldn’t “condemn” it.

Do you “understand” what’s happening in a Middle East where bombing another country is a regular occurrence?

Let’s start with Saudi Arabia bombing Yemen. What has it achieved? We know it has destroyed Yemen’s main airport, much of the country’s infrastructure, and killed many civilians. We also know that it has had little impact on its main military target, the Houthis, who control much of the country. It may well have made them more popular. The other main beneficiary of the bombing has been Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, who have been left free to capture more territory in the south-east of the country. American planes used to bomb Al Qaeda in Yemen, but now Western media informs us that the main danger is the “Iranian-backed” Houthis. What the Houthis may or may not stand for is not reported – let me know if you ever find out. But being “Iranian-backed” is apparently a big no-no.

After all, America is still holding on to the “option” of bombing Iran, allegedly over a nuclear issue, and America’s close ally Israel is rearing to have a go.

But hold on a minute. Aren’t the Americans now supporting Shia militias in Iraq that are not just “Iranian-backed” but are actually “Iranian-led”. These militias captured Tikrit from Isis and are now trying to win back Ramadi.

There’s plenty of bombing going on in Iraq too. Those airforces having a go at Isis include the Iranian, American, French, Danish, Dutch, Australian, Canadian, Saudi, Emirati, Jordanian and Bahraini.

Has bombing Isis had much effect? No doubt many tanks and artillery pieces have been knocked out. But beyond that?? The damage to infrastructure and civilian deaths caused by the bombing is probably assisting Isis recruiting. It should also be noted that purposely targeting civilian infrastructure like oil refineries (which the US has admitted to) is a war crime. [Of course, this does not let the barbaric Isis forces off the hook. They are guilty of horrendous war crimes on a daily basis.]

Then we move to Syria, where for the last few years the Assad regime has been bombing its opponents. Some thought America should respond with its own air strikes, and this nearly happened when Assad was accused of using poison gas. Now America is bombing, not Assad but his strongest opponents, Isis and the other main jihadist force, al-Nusra. Now, when Isis captures the historic city of Palmyra and threatens to destroy the ancient ruins it is hard not to feel some sympathy for the defeated soldiers of the Syrian regime. But aren’t they baddies too? Weren’t we going to bomb them? Well, America’s ally Israel has been bombing Syria periodically , as well as bombing Lebanon and the Gaza strip. But to what result, other than the death of many people?

Israel’s other neighbour, Egypt, won’t be bombed because it is collaborating with Israel to keep the people of Gaza isolated from the outside world. Instead, Egypt did its own bombing, in Libya, after some Egyptians were executed by Isis forces. And as usual it was bombing to no good effect. Libya is a stunning example of the murderous stupidity of bombing campaigns. In 2011 thousands of Libyans were either killed or displaced as the bombs rained down from British, French and American warplanes.  It didn’t bring about democracy but a fractured state where the strongest militias now rule and fight each other.

The pilots dropping the bombs never see the havoc they reap: the broken bodies, the broken buildings and the broken societies. Neither do the governments and commanders that sent them on their way.

It’s easy to bomb another country. It’s easy cause so much destruction. Surely, there are better ways.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Baby boomers, property speculation and catastrophic climate change – has intergenerational politics ruined democracy?

45

Has democracy failed us? Has the tyranny of the self interested majority and the politically tone deaf and ignorant left us with a political system that is simply too broken to be fixed?

The intergenerational friction between baby boomers who have been state sponsored from birth is seen no where better than in Auckland’s property market and with climate change.

CFwWSecVIAA6CRa

Gen Xers and Gen Ys have to pay for their own education, then have to try and save a deposit in a housing market speculated out of their reach by baby boomer investors (and foreign speculators), have to save for their own retirement and now are being told that the age of retirement has to be raised so we can afford it all.

Democracy has gone from being the promise that your children will have a better deal than you have received to being a promise that your children will be in more debt than you are.

Generation Rent is now a reality in a market that has no rights for renters…

Generation Rent – that is how one economist is labelling the increasing number of young New Zealanders locked out of the home ownership dream.

Economist Shamubeel Eaqub says the census figures tell the story – Kiwis in their 30s, the age at which many start to think about having a family, are increasingly stuck in rental accommodation.

…and underemployment for those generations is becoming the norm...

A rising tide of “underemployment” is creating a new social underclass, say the Greens in accusing the Government of “massaging” unemployment figures.

Since 2013 March Quarter, the number of people classified as underemployed had risen from 82,400 to 103,600 in the same quarter in 2015. 

The statistics in the latest Household Labour Force Survey show that while unemployment had dropped to 5.8 per cent, underemployment had risen by 21,200 in two years.

Statistics New Zealand began measuring underemployment in 2013, defining it as the “grey area” where people have a job but have similarities to unemployed people because they face a “partial lack of work”.

It is when a part-time worker is willing and available to work more hours than they usually do. The statistics are limited to part-time workers.

“We know have 103,000 underemployed, but Government treats them as employed for their figures,” said Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei. 

…killing off public broadcasting like TVNZ7 and strangling Campbell Live while promoting neoliberal voices like Henry and Hosking are of course essential to keeping the blinkers on and feeding the myth of the poor being responsible for being poor.

With so many Gen Y and Gen Xers fleeing NZ for work and the ability to pay off their student debt, Baby Boomers are a democratic majority meaning they sway politics to their advantage. The voting record for people under 40 is atrocious when compare to those older generations who have a vested interest. This is why a capital gains tax has been so hard to establish, why the funding for pensioners out strips funding for youth and why a $1000 kiwi saver bonus can be dumped without any problem. National understand the importance of being perceived by the mainstream media as ‘moderate’ when the reality is that much of what National have passed as welfare policy is draconian, but because middle class tax breaks like working for families and interest free student loans haven’t been touched, the voiceless suffering on the bottom are never heard.

That’s why when AAAP protest angrily it surprises many, they have no connection with the reality of those welfare reforms or the grinding poverty those on the bottom experience.

Climate change is probably where intergenerational politics are most damaging. Beyond self interested voting that robs the next generation of the universal subsidies that built Baby Boomers up,  the absolute do nothing approach to climate change is not only robbing todays generation of a present, it is robbing them of a tomorrow. The rapidly warming climate caused by human pollution is now at a tipping point…

More Bad Climate News: Once-Stable Antarctic Region Suddenly Melting
Antarctica’s glaciers have been making headlines during the past year, and not in a good way. Whether it’s a massive ice shelf facing imminent risk of collapse, glaciers in the West Antarctic past the point of no return, or new threats to East Antarctic ice, it’s all been rather gloomy.
And now I’m afraid there’s more bad news: a new study published in the journal Science, led by a team of my colleagues and I from the University of Bristol, has observed a sudden increase of ice loss in a previously stable part of Antarctica.

…if this warming continues and vast methane reserves beneath the ocean or in the permafrost of Siberia are released, it is game over in terms of being able to adapt fast enough for much of the planet.

The ice loss in Antarctica is so large that it is causing small changes in the Earth’s gravity field.

These realities seem unsolvable by modern politics because the inconvenient truths and unpalatable solutions threaten much of the current establishment. Baby Boomers don’t need to be concerned with climate change, because let’s be honest – they won’t be here for the worst parts of it.

That doesn’t leave us hopeless, but it does challenge the way forward. Perhaps political parties have simply outlived their ability to make meaningful change and the future will rely on direct action.  To begin with, The 5th estate has an obligation and responsibility to overthrow the 4th estate for dereliction of duty and activists need to identify protests where the safety of polite protest is dropped for outright civil disobedience.

The political system can work when the middle class feel the economic hardship those on the bottom face, Greece and Spain are proof positive of that, but until that occurs, resistance can no longer be meek.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service