Home Blog Page 1934

This weeks Waatea news column – Housing Summit – a conference of despair and desperation

2

Screen Shot 2014-11-03 at 9.27.31 am

 

This weeks Waatea news column –
Housing Summit – a conference of despair and desperation

 

The horror, pain, desperation, hurt, despair and social damage being perpetrated by this Government in state housing was stripped bare at the Housing Summit in Auckland today.

The only media there to cover it was myself on behalf of Waatea News and Mike Treen from Unite.

 

I’m not sure what was more terribly saddening, the stories on display or that there were so few media bothering to turn up.

The reality of National’s draconian state housing policies collide with the cruelty of WINZ and astounding incompetence of CYFs and the media’s focus is on Inky the bloody octopus.

John Minto, Prue Kapua, Efeso Collins, Tamaki Housing Group, Vanessa Kurangi, Vanessa Cole, Dr Innes Asher, Darryl Evans, Dr Huhana Hickey, Rachel Goldsmith, Danielle Bergin, Rev Uesifili Unasa, Rev Michael Blakely, Rev Kereama Pene, Syd Keepa, Mike Treen, Robert Reid and Phil Palfrey highlighted the suffering state house tenants are being exposed to in dreadful detail.

It was beyond sobering, it was rage inducing. That the most vulnerable amongst us should be forced to live with such appalling processes should lead every news bulletin.

It won’t.

The poor, Maori, Pacific Islanders, working classes and the disabled lined up to give witness to their experiences and they were horrific. The disabled lesbian who has to defend her lifestyle to religious agencies who now own her home, the poor who have to answer to corporate Iwi instead of the state, the rape victim who was forced to live next to the place she was raped in, the children who are dying early because of disgusting houses and the fear that the stasi like State Housing and WINZ create is despicable in a country that likes to think of itself as a liberal democracy.

State Housing was once a means of empowering those most vulnerable in society, the most staggering shock from the conference was the total lack of hope the privatisation agenda run by National has generated.

The conference split into groups and they worked on ideas and strategies to fight back, refusing to allow their pain and experiences to be for nothing. If only Bill English and Nick Smith had been there to hear the torture they are passing as policy.

It seems the state house dream of Michael Joseph Savage has died, but what is most distressing is that so few NZers have turned up to the funeral. We must not and can not allow these courageous souls fight on their own.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

This weeks Waatea news column – Who actually benefits from the Te Ture Whenua Maori Bill?

0

Screen Shot 2014-11-03 at 9.27.31 am

 

This weeks Waatea news column – Who actually benefits from the Te Ture Whenua Maori Bill?

 

Barely a month after the Waitangi Tribunal criticised the new plans for Maori land for its utter lack of real consultation with Maori, the Maori Development Minister, Te Ururoa Flavell has pushed ahead with the law change.

Why?

 

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Malcolm Evans – The Jafa’s are coming

1

Screen Shot 2016-04-19 at 10.42.08 am

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Political Caption Competition

14

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 10.07.24 am

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Daily Thought

1

12974292_1054444251315591_7995006298213024087_n

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The future of the Left in New Zealand – notes for Christchurch seminar held on 11 April 2016

22

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 10.00.33 am

If one looked at New Zealand in isolation from events internationally one could be forgiven for thinking we are a permanent bastion of neo-liberalism where struggling low and middle income families are happy with the rich running the country at everyone else’s expense.

We have a right-wing Prime Minister and government which is apparently very popular. National has won the past three elections supporting policies which have grown income inequality while wealth inequality has become more extreme year by year. Despite New Zealanders saying they don’t like the growing divide between rich and poor there is no sign of any big disturbance to this unhappy situation. The main opposition party, Labour, has no plans for any significant change to the neo-liberal status quo which it introduced from 1984.

On the other hand countries overseas are being shaken by a growing restlessness about inequality. The Occupy Movement was a sign of that but indications of discontent are everywhere around the globe. Jeremy Corbyn’s election as leader of the Labour Party and the Bernie Sanders phenomenon in the US are the most high profile but we’ve also seen the rapid growth of radical left-wing alternatives in many countries around the world.

Why not NZ?

One of the media myths we live with is that John Key is a special Prime Minister, that he’s a great communicator and has the common touch. Many political commentators say we haven’t seen the likes of a PM like him for many decades. He has certainly survived myriad personal political scandals that would have brought most leaders down several times over.

So why does National and Key continue to have big support in public opinion polls?

I think there are two reasons. Firstly because huge numbers of people are so disengaged from the political process they follow issues and developments at a very superficial level – something encouraged by the likes of right-wing commentator/journalists Mike Hosking, Paul Henry and Sean Plunkett. It’s not that most people are apathetic. They are interested in politics but they are disillusioned with the politics of the mainstream parties. It’s the kind of mood summed up well in the political graffiti I saw around Auckland in the 1970s courtesy the Communist Party (or was it the Anarchists?) “Don’t vote – Fletchers always wins”.

Secondly and more importantly has been the absolute, crippling failure of Labour to show any direction other than what they’ve delivered for the past 35 years – the rule of the 1%. Labour survives as a political party because of its brand recognition. There’s nothing else left. Despite its rhetoric the differences in economic policy between Labour and National are cosmetic. Labour has no policies to reduce income inequality – NONE!!

Within Labour there is a battle going on between some more progressive members and a small but powerful group of MPs linked to the 1980s who stifle any moves to shift the party away from neo-liberalism. Ironically Labour’s last two election defeats have left this group in a stronger position within the party as a larger minority in a smaller caucus. They occupy safe Labour seats and/or are high on the party list. This group involves people like Phil Goff (who introduced GST and tertiary education fees back in the 1980s) Trevor Mallard, Clayton Cosgrove, Annette King and Damien O’Connor.

Goff is now the corporate choice to run Auckland as city mayor – a place his fellow former Labour MP Lianne Dalziel now occupies in Christchurch as the corporate pick for mayor.
This minority within a minority party are an enormous roadblock to change – a position reinforced by the fact the mainstream media see politics as left Vs right in terms of Labour Vs National. That’s the political context whereby the news is presented to New Zealanders and the mainstream media follows it religiously. (Take for example Radio NZ using Michelle Boag and Brian Edwards as their right Vs left commentators)

The Greens and New Zealand First I think of as niche parties which will never develop a mass base to become the government. In the case of the Greens their policies are much more progressive than Labour but in the public mind the Greens are linked with concern for the environment which for struggling families appears as a secondary concern to holding body and soul together.

Let’s be honest

New Zealand is still going backwards as we have every year since the 1984 Labour government wreaked havoc with the economy and lives of working New Zealanders. The rich are still winning the class war with Labour and National firmly on their side. The wealthy grow ever more bloated while the share of wealth going to low and middle income families continues to diminish.
National is continuing down this path with the likes of charter schools, selling state houses, privatising prison contracts, contracting out public services and a thousand other attacks on families on low incomes.

From here on…

Change will come to New Zealand – just as it is happening in other countries – and when it does it will be broader, deeper and move more quickly than we expect. It will be either the Donald Trump variety or the Bernie Sanders variety or possibly both. It will take us all by surprise.
I therefore think the future is very hopeful and the challenge for the left is to have in place the vision, the campaigns and the policies which will give hope to the missing million voters and struggling low and middle income families in particular. If the left is not ready to respond with radical political messages of hope and optimism then we will be leaving the country open for fascism.

These political messages have to be set in reality so the left must be actively engaged in campaigns which support the living wage with guaranteed hours of work; better public services; the end to privatisation of our public assets and contracting out of public services; opposition to user pays charges; opposition to privatisation of state housing; high quality affordable housing for everyone; swimmable rivers and polluter-pays policies etc

I have always believed that political activists can be more effective outside parliament than in it because politicians rarely lead political change (except on behalf of the 1% when they use the rhetoric of helping the poor to advance the agenda of the rich).

However I’m a member of the Mana Movement and it’s the only parliamentary party I’ve ever joined or wanted to be part of. Unless Maori are at the heart of a broad movement inside and outside parliament promoting radical change then whatever it is it won’t be socialism. Maori are the indigenous people and are at the heart of the New Zealand working class. They have suffered the most through the last 30 years in particular from successive National and Labour governments.

If we get things right for Maori we get things right for everyone.

Socialism in New Zealand will be different to what it looks like in any other countries because each country has a different history and different realities. However the principles of socialism are common everywhere and will be reflected in the kiwi socialism for which we are striving.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

How Not To Be An Asshole Episode 47 – Were You Wearing a Hallensteins Shirt Ft Jay Roacher, Ikarus, Joel Rickerby & Madeline

0

https://soundcloud.com/how-not-to-be-an-asshole/episode-47-were-you-wearing-a-hallensteins-shirt-ft-jay-roacher-ikarus-joel-rickerby-madeline

 

While Dominic is off traveling the country on a poetry adventure he stopped off to interview his good friends Jay Roacher, Ikarus, Joel Rickerby and Madeline. They talk about graffiti, fatherhood and Nicks peculiar fashion choices.

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 9.52.08 am

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Murray McCully’s Security Council speech – Palestine Human Rights Campaign Aotearoa/New Zealand

8

CfyrE_qXIAQRVdi.jpg-large

On 18 April 2016 in New York, our Minister of Foreign Affairs, Murray McCully, addressed the Security Council on behalf of the New Zealand Government concerning Israel and Palestine. McCully asked the assembly “. . . what does the international community expect of the Security Council in the difficult circumstances of today?” The short answer is that the Council should live up to its name and guarantee security for the Palestinian people in their homeland by requiring Israel to abide by and respect the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Israel has violated more Security Council Resolutions than any other country on Earth, by far.

Mr McCully, acknowledging the responsibility of the Council towards security, said in his speech that he found it “difficult to understand why the United Nations Security Council has not passed a single Resolution on this question in over seven years.” The problem is that Israel ignores, with impunity, most Security Council Resolutions. Our Minister of Foreign Affairs asserts that “in the eyes of the international community .. . . the two state solution is the only path forward for resolving this matter” yet the truth is, the Security Council is out of touch with the real majority of the international community. McCully told the meeting that “it is becoming increasingly apparent that the two state solution may be moving beyond reach and that if matters continue as they have for the last two years without action from this Council and others, the two state solution will be dead.” If Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and the majority of Israeli opinion is to be believed, the two state ‘solution’ is not only dead, it is already buried.

So long as Israel is allowed to go on stealing Palestinian land and subjecting the people to appalling human rights abuses, what possible reason could there be to believe that so-called ‘negotiations’ could be anything other than a nod to Israel to continue its 50-year belligerent military Occupation of Palestinians. Any Palestinian ‘state’ that might one day be permitted to exist would, like the Gaza Strip, find itself entirely subject to Israeli control, with no means of defence and no sovereignty over its air space or territorial waters. Similarly the Palestinian economy would continue to be subservient to Israeli interests.

A single state with equal rights for all is the only way to end this nightmare. But first the international community will have to accept its responsibility, not only for having denied self-determination for the Palestinian people for so long but also for ending Israel’s untouchable status. Supporting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign (BDS) is a far better measure of the international community’s view of the “path forward for resolving this matter” and the Security Council has the means. New Zealand’s representatives must stop covering for Israel and instead use the precious remaining months at the Security Council to demand action in defence of international law. There can be no peace with justice without bringing Israel to account.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Waatea 5th Estate – the State Housing Crisis

3

Joining us tonight to discuss the State Housing crisis in NZ…

In studio, President of Maori Women’s Welfare League – Prue Kapua
Chairperson of the Otara/Papatoetoe Community Board – Efeso Collins
On the phone, disability advocate and state house tenant – Dr Huhana Hickey

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Daily Blog Open Mic – Wednesday – 20th April 2016

2

openmike

 

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

Moderation rules are more lenient for this section, but try and play nicely.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Are National Party voters the new Trump supporters of the South Pacific?

40

Screen Shot 2016-04-02 at 6.42.53 pm

 

With the cult of no personality that surrounds John Key like a cargo cult minus the cargo, National keep bumping 50% in the polls. Key’s vacant aspiration and empty optimism slips into our laid back culture of anti-intellectualism as smoothly as an Edge Radio promo leads into Ben & Jono on TV3.

His laid back casual fascism aimed at the poor keeps a middle class pretence of moderation while cutting crony capitalism deals and building tax havens.

That a right wing money trader should exploit the power of Office shouldn’t shock or surprise us, but the widespread devotion to him by so many should.

National voters don’t care about mass surveillance lies. They don’t care about the filthy tactics exposed in Dirty Politics, they don’t care about him touching a young woman repeatedly at work, they don’t care he’s built a tax haven, they don’t care he screams the Opposition support rapists, they’re relaxed about social poverty.

Bryce Edwards paints a bleak picture...

Remember Dirty Politics? And Dotcom’s Moment of Truth? Both these 2014 scandals contained striking revelations about how the political establishment works. Yet the revelations certainly didn’t appear to have a negative political impact on the National Government. Despite the huge debates and masses of media coverage, these scandals didn’t sink the Government, and in some respects might have helped National shore up its electoral support.

National voters resemble more and more like Trump supporters. They both have a blinding anger at having to be weighed down with other people’s circumstances. Neoliberalism tells us our success has nothing to do with hegemonic structures within society, it’s all just our own hard work. It’s seductive simplicity erodes solidarity and splinters us from the powerful who use division to keep us from being organised to stop them.

 

10001575_10153874675730576_1967712305_n

 

George Monbiot gets it…

Neoliberalism – the ideology at the root of all our problems

Financial meltdown, environmental disaster and even the rise of Donald Trump – neoliberalism has played its part in them all. Why has the left failed to come up with an alternative?

Bernard Hickey understands the political reality of a Government hell bent on doing nothing to stop the property bubble because it locks the property speculating middle class in goose step with National…

This Auckland housing crisis, or jamboree (depending on your point of view), seems not to have hurt the Government in the polls and it was notable the latest REINZ figures were welcomed as a sign of success by Prime Minister John Key and Finance Minister Bill English.

The not-so-dirty little secret of the politics of rampant house price inflation is it makes voters richer and happier.

They have more equity to reinvest in more rental properties, they can use the equity to build and run businesses and they can use their houses as ATMs for the odd holiday or two.

Renters don’t vote at nearly the same rate as property owners so politicians can easily preach that they are doing something about housing and safely do very little to stop the inflation.

Secretly, it suits them.

…and Gareth Morgan points out that it suits the rich to use NZ as a tax haven…

Morgan: Tax burden falling on NZ’s working class

Economist Gareth Morgan believes New Zealand could be missing out on up to 25 percent of total income tax because the rich aren’t paying their fair share.

Morgan also told The Nation it is possible to get global corporations like Apple and Facebook to pay more tax on what they earn here.

The Government collects about $30 billion per year in income tax, but Mr Morgan says that take could be much bigger. The figures come from a soon-to-be-published report from the Morgan Foundation.

Dr Morgan says the report on New Zealand’s current tax system shows that the burden is falling on middle- and working-class families.

…self-interested wilful ignorance has built a perfect storm that Key has exploited and it makes us a worse people.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

What you are not being told about in the Royal Society of New Zealand Climate Change Report

15

Cf8zAJNUIAEeorl.jpg-large

The climate denial that permeates NZ politics, media and society is increasingly becoming impossible to cling to. The Royal Society of New Zealand has painted a grim picture of the mildest impacts of Climate Change and they are deeply concerning…

1-in-100 year events could be annually 

Coming from New Zealand’s pre-eminent research body for science, the report confirms the severity of the local threat posed by climate change. Chair of the expert panel which wrote it, Professor James Renwick, said New Zealanders were particularly vulnerable.

“Many New Zealanders live on the coast and two-thirds of us live in flood-prone areas,” he said.

In South Dunedin, a high water table meant high tides would lead to frequent surface ponding and a lack of drainage for storm water.

The report added that the east coasts of both the North and South Islands were sensitive to erosion and inundation caused by climate change.

The Royal Society’s warnings come just a day after New Zealand was accused of cheating over its main climate change weapon, the Emissions Trading Scheme.

In its report, the Royal Society broke down its analysis into several key areas.

One was the effect of climate change on coastal environments.

Depending on how greenhouse gas emissions were managed, the sea would rise between 30 centimetres and 1.1 metres by 2100, it said.

This would have an exponential impact, making a one-in-100-year high tide an almost daily event in some places and making storm surges much more potent.

Ponding and soil saturation from previous floods would aggravate the effect.

Freshwater resources would also be harmed by climate change.

…most concerning is that these are the best impacts we can hope for, the worst case scenarios however are what we are seeing with super heating of the planet crossing environmental tipping points that are impossible to reverse. Rapid adaptation is where we need to be now, not slow followers.

Climate deniers like Cameron Slater mix with climate minimalists like David Farrar to keep the debate from  advancing. NZ has one of the highest levels of climate deniers in the developed world, that wilful ignorance is what is stopping us from politically demanding action on every front.

Mass transport solutions, sustainability, rethinking work, solar, hydro, water preservation, climate refugees, inequality and poverty – these all need radical rethinks as the planet melts.

But we also need to crack down on corporate power.

What you are not being told about in the Royal Society of New Zealand Climate Change Report is who is to blame for this madness.

The answer on that front, is painfully obvious…

The Oil Industry Was Warned About Climate Change in 1968

A newly released trove of documents from the US oil industry is a walk through a forgotten past — a world before the science of climate change was controversial.

The records, amassed over four years of research by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), outline how much American petroleum companies knew about the dangers of carbon emissions from fossil fuels long before global warming became the hot-button issue it is today. The center began releasing those documents this week, including a 1968 report to the American Petroleum Institute (API) that urged more research into reducing their carbon footprints.

“There are numerous points along this path where the industry was on notice that this was a rising risk,” said Carroll Muffett, the president of CIEL. By 1968, “You have two paths in front of you. One is to respond to this rising risk, notwithstanding the continuing uncertainty, or the alternative is to try to discredit the science. And I think history has shown what path they chose.”

Oil executives started huddling about pollution controls in 1946 as the public began raising concerns about smog in cities like Los Angeles, the documents lay out. Those meetings eventually resulted in a “Smoke and Fumes Committee” being set up by the API, the industry’s top trade association.

By 1957, scientists from ExxonMobil’s corporate ancestor, Humble Oil, identified the burning of fossil fuels as a contributor to the rise of carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. Then in 1968, Elmer Robinson — a meteorologist who led environmental research at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), which had extensive ties to the industry — warned API that rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere “may be the cause of serious world-wide environmental changes.”

“This is SRI, their own consulting scientists, delivering a very clear message to industry leaders that climate change poses a potentially significant risk,” Muffett said. “It could affect sea-level rise, glacial melt, lead to potentially severe environmental damage worldwide.”

Related: ExxonMobil Is Increasingly Being Singled Out for Its Role in Climate Change Deceit

Gretchen Goldman, lead analyst for the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the documents show the oil industry not only knew climate change was happening, “but were at the cutting edge of the science when the science was in its infancy.”

“These new studies push the timeline back for when we have evidence that the fossil fuel industry knew about climate change,” she said. The Humble study in particular “takes it as a given” that fossil fuels are adding CO2 to the atmosphere, with warming a likely effect.

“It’s remarkable to see them have this sophisticated a position this early,” she said.

The 1968 Robinson report recognizes the uncertainties in the science at the time — but Robinson “is clearly and quite explicitly concerned” about CO2, Muffett said. And he said the industry’s leading players responded by trying to poke holes in the science and delaying action.

“From my perspective, one of the testaments to the effectiveness of the climate-denial movement — the climate skepticism that they sought to sow — is that the clock on climate change keeps getting reset over and over again,” he said. “Constantly, the public is persuaded that climate change is a new issue, some new theory that is just being tested, just being proved.”

…we have been set up by big oil from the beginning. Like an evil drug dealer, big oil has addicted capitalism to cheap petrol and occupied and butchered millions and enslaved hundreds of millions more while murdering the environment for quarterly profit margins.

Climate change is the ultimate achilles heal of consumer capitalism and as it rapidly warps our world fighting back stops being optional. It will become mandatory.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Gareth Morgan and Multiple Empty Houses

35

Gareth-Morgan

I caught Gareth Morgan saying this on The Nation (TV3; 16 April 1026) in the weekend (Interview: Economist Gareth Morgan):

Look how many politicians own multiple houses. We’re all on this gravy train now. Look at me, I own six houses. I don’t have tenants; they just make carpets dirty. I do it because I know you want to get in on this as well and so you’re going to bid the price of those houses up. So as long as I sit there long enough enjoying this benefit, you’re going to double the value of my house. This is a major shift in wealth from the ‘have‑nots’ to the ‘haves’.

Now Morgan is not a bad person; rather, he’s a master of self-parody. He puts his money where his mouth is; he, as a more-than-slightly-rich person, shows us how the slightly rich and not-so-famous (the “you” in his quote) seek to ‘make money’ by doing absolutely nothing other than withdraw good houses, simultaneously, from both the rental and the owner-occupier housing markets. We even have the gall to call this activity ‘investment’.

More pertinently, he’s saying that politicians do the same thing as he is doing: sitting on empty properties, withdrawing houses from the housing supply. And he’s kind-of suggesting that people well connected in the media do it as well. No wonder neither the politicians nor the mainstream media want to address the issue; too many of the local well-connected appear to be into cynical land-banking. We don’t need to look to Asian money-launderers to explain why dwellings in certain parts of Auckland and Wellington are so scarce.

On 12 May 2015 I wrote (MPs’ Real Property Interests, Scoop). Unfortunately the register for MPs’ pecuniary interests is not well designed. When it comes to MPs’ real estate the categories need to be widened. It’s not enough for MPs to say that they own a ‘rental house’. We, the public need to know if these house are tenanted or not. We don’t mind if our MPs are good socially responsible private landlords. But we do want to know if they are landbanking or otherwise withdrawing houses from the supply available for New Zealanders to live in.

Given the stories I’ve heard about London and other world cities – with parts of Kensington becoming ghost communities; houses owned as holiday homes by foreign oligarchs; and that’s just the upper end of the phenomenon – we may in fact be bearing witness to the 21st century urban equivalent of the great Highland clearances of 200 years ago. Then, people were displaced from their Highland ‘places to be’ and into the slums of Glasgow because the putative owners of those lands came to regard people as an inconvenience; a liability rather than a productive source of rental income. (One of those Highland refugees came to be New Zealand’s most renowned land reformer, John Mackenzie; though few today have heard of any politician from the ‘olden days’, Grey, Seddon, Ngata, Savage and Muldoon excepted.)

Our politicians will not address the empty-house syndrome. We can easily imagine why. Our mainstream media will not do so either; same reason. There are some issues that we, the middle 50%, have to raise – and keep raising – through other channels. Until, that is, questions are actually answered, and policy solutions are taken seriously. It is not a solution to build houses on ever-expanding city fringes while larger numbers of houses in the most desirable suburbs are being acquired and emptied by ‘multiple-house’ speculators. Tax owners of empty and near-empty houses. Don’t tax socially responsible landlords.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Political Caption Competition

16

Screen Shot 2016-04-16 at 10.05.54 am

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Daily Thought

0

k0pv0-1

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service