Home Blog Page 1815

TDB Top 5 International Stories: Tuesday 18th October 2016

0

Screen-Shot-2016-09-09-at-9.47.34-am

 

5: MUSLIM STUDENTS SPEAK OUT AGAINST FBI INFORMANT PLAN EXPOSED BY THE INTERCEPT

WHEN IN LAST week’s presidential debate Donald Trump suggested that Muslims in the United States should “report when they see something going on,” he sparked a satirical backlash on Twitter mocking the idea that every Muslim has some secret knowledge of terrorism.

But the FBI has also aggressively sought terrorism leads from Muslim Americans; a presentation published by The Intercept last month suggested looking for informants in mosques and Muslim student associations, and that disclosure has prompted its own pushback. Several student leaders contacted us to decry the bureau’s invasion of spaces where young Muslims thought they could just be themselves.

Nabintou Doumbia, a sophomore at Wayne State University in Detroit, described her MSA as “a place where you hang out and feel comfortable, see friends, have real, raw discussions about anything, including controversial things, say, feminism, or very serious discussions about spirituality and your relationship to God.”

“You work so hard to build that trust, to have people open up in a space,” said Doumbia. The effect of government surveillance, she said, was that “you start to notice very subtle things, like being careful with the words that you use, and you notice your Muslim peers doing the same thing. There are times I’m not speaking, because I’m worried about how it might be heard.”

The Intercept

4:  Why Female Trump Fans Don’t Care About the Sexual Assault Allegations

For more than a week, the Trump campaign has been grappling with the now- infamous pussy-grabbing tape followed by the accusations that Donald Trump sexually harassed and assaulted women. Republican officials have been put in the awkward position of endorsing a scandal-ridden and erratic candidate or rejecting him and earning the ire of his supporters.

For hardcore Trump supporters, though, the real scandal is the way the media is hyping dubious, decades-old stories to tear down the one man who could rescue the country from doom.

Many of these supporters gathered this Saturday in a car-dealership parking lot in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, for a Trump rally. The usual signifiers were there: “Deplorable Me” and “Trump that Bitch” T-shirts, an overwhelmingly white and mostly middle-aged or older crowd. The attendees were mostly men, but there were plenty of women as well, none of whom seemed to have an iota of doubt about their candidate.

“The media, they’re obsessed with sex, but the people are not,” said Ellie Martin, a volunteer with the Trump campaign.

Vice News

 

3:  WikiLeaks: Assange’s internet ‘severed’ by state actor

 

WikiLeaks says that founder Julian Assange’s internet access has been cut by an unidentified state actor.

The whistle-blowing organisation said on Twitter on Monday that they have activated their “contingency plans” after its co-founder’s internet service was intentionally cut off.

The internet is one of the few available means through which Assange can maintain contact with the outside world.

Aljazeera

2:  Amy Goodman Broadcasts from North Dakota Across from Court Where She Faces Riot Charge Today

We broadcast live from Mandan, North Dakota, across the street from the Morton County Courthouse, where more than a half-dozen people will appear in court today on charges related to the ongoing resistance to the construction of the $3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline. At least three people are due in court today on felony charges after locking themselves to heavy construction equipment. Morton County also issued an arrest warrant for Democracy Now!’s Amy Goodman on September 8, five days after we released our on-the-ground video report from Labor Day weekend showing the Dakota Access pipeline company’s security guards physically assaulting nonviolent, mostly Native American land protectors, pepper-spraying them and unleashing attack dogs, one of which was shown with blood dripping from its nose and mouth. The original charge against Goodman was criminal trespass, but due to lack of evidence, State’s Attorney Ladd Erickson has filed a new charge against Goodman: “riot.” If Judge John Grinsteiner approves the new riot charge, she will be appearing in court today at 1:30 p.m. CT to challenge it.

Democracy Now

1:  Climate change could drive 122m more people into extreme poverty by 2030

Up to 122 million more people worldwide could be living in extreme poverty by 2030 as a result of climate change and its impacts on small-scale farmers’ incomes, a major UN report warned on Monday.

Climate change is “a major and growing threat to global food security”, said the report, warning that it could increase the global population living in extreme poverty by between 35 and 122 million by 2030, with farming communities in sub-Saharan Africa among the hardest hit.

The 2016 State of Food and Agriculture report, published by the Rome-based Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), calls for “deep transformations in agriculture and food systems” and for the world’s half-billion small-scale farms to receive particular support.

The report warns that without “widespread adoption of sustainable land, water, fisheries and forestry practices, global poverty cannot be eradicated”.

The Guardian

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Daily Blog Open Mic – Tuesday 18th October 2016

6

openmike

 

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

Moderation rules are more lenient for this section, but try and play nicely.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

A Howling Moral Vacuum: America’s Syrian Policy

33

unnamed-1

AVID FANS of the US television series Homeland are already familiar with the drill. People in the White House, people in the Pentagon, people in the State Department let it be known to people working in the Central Intelligence Agency that certain things must be made to happen. None of these people will ever tell (or admit to) the world what it is that they want to make happen. That’s because what the US actually wants to happen is very often the opposite of what the US says it wants to happen. And that, of course, is the whole point of an outfit like the CIA. It allows the American Government to enjoy its diplomatic cake while blowing everybody else’s cake to Kingdom Come.

Take Syria, for example. In the earliest days of the uprising that became the Syrian Civil War the CIA was hard at work on the ground. It’s job was to build up the armed resistance to the regime of Bashar al-Assad as quickly as possible. Money and weapons flowed freely – even though the CIA’s knowledge of exactly who it was funding and equipping was, at best, sketchy. At worst, the CIA helped to funnel American aid to individuals and groups who had a much greater interest in Salafist Islam than they did in liberal secular democracy.

Of course the creation of a liberal secular democracy was not the real reason the CIA was in Syria. The real reason they were working so hard to make civil war inevitable was because they wanted to prevent Syria and its neighbours, Lebanon and Iraq, from getting any closer to the Islamic Republic of Iran.

In pursuing this objective the United States wasn’t only acting in its own interests, but also in the interests of the governments of Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Turkey was paranoid that the quasi-autonomous Kurdish enclave in Northern Iraq might one day morph into an independent Kurdistan. Such a development would make the task of repressing its own Kurdish minority ten times harder.

Saudi Arabia was determined to free the Sunni Syrian majority from the tutelage of Assad’s Shi’a allies – thereby preventing the creation of a powerful and antagonistic crescent of Shi’a-dominated states stretching from the Pakistani border to the Mediterranean Sea.

Israel’s motives for fomenting an intractable civil war may have been no more reputable than preferring a Syria racked by the agonies of civil and religious strife, to a Syria peaceful and prosperous enough to once again attempt to acquire weapons of mass destruction. Once again? Oh yes, in the early 2000s the Assad regime, with help from the North Koreans, undertook the construction of its own nuclear reactor. In 2007, Israeli jets blew the reactor to smithereens before it could come on line.

The motives of the people in the White House, Pentagon and State Department were much the same as the Israelis. US strategic objectives in the Middle East have been remarkably consistent since the end of World War II. First and foremost there’s the region’s oil reserves. These must, at all costs, remain under the control of regimes friendly to the United States. Even the remotest possibility that the emergence of a dominant regional power, or combination of regional powers, might threaten US access to Middle eastern oil is to be “terminated with extreme prejudice” (as they say in the CIA).

Whether the potential leader of such an emergent entity be a Persian (as in the case of the Iranian Prime Minister, Mossadegh) or Arab (as in the case of the Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein) the United States has demonstrated that it will stop at nothing to preserve its hegemony in the Middle East.

So, the next time you’re wincing at horrific images broadcast out of East Aleppo, ask yourself why the civilian population hasn’t left the war zone for somewhere safer. While you’re at it, you might also ask yourself how it is that the Jihadis dug into the rubble never seem to run out of arms and ammunition. And, why it is that only the Assad Government and its Russian allies are being ordered to stop the shelling and the bombing of civilian targets?

Could it be that the men, women and children under fire in East Aleppo are much too valuable to the Jihadis as human shields to be allowed to leave their shattered homes? Or is it simply their immense value as propaganda weapons? Especially East Aleppo’s children, whose tiny broken bodies are beamed into the living-rooms of Western households practically every night of the week. Absent from our news bulletins, however, are the images of the men, women and children being killed by the Jihadi artillery shells exploding every day in the streets of West Aleppo. Funny that.

The US Secretary of State, John Kerry, just like his predecessor, Hillary Clinton, may say America wants peace in Syria. But if that was really the case, then the US Government would have ordered the CIA out of Syria, and stopped shipping arms to the rebel units dug into the rubble of East Aleppo. If ending the Syrian civil war was America’s true objective in the Middle East, then it would be making peace at the side of the Russian Federation – not casting it as the principal obstacle to a successful resolution of the conflict.

What makes the Homeland series so compelling is the howling moral vacuum at the heart of American foreign and defence policy. It sucks the characters into its emptiness and leaves them breathing dirt in the dark. They are expendable instruments who would like to do good, but can’t. Because doing good is not what serving a superpower is all about.

President Ronald Reagan may have presented America as “a shining city on a hill”, but it was Richard Nixon’s Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, who came closest to describing her true character. “America”, he said, “has no friends – only interests.”

Remember that next time you watch the news.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

GUEST BLOG: Dave Macpherson – ‘Nero’ Coleman fiddling while people die

3

jonathan-coleman-getty

The mainstream and social media carried a story on the weekend covering the latest OECD report showing this country has (once again) the highest rate of youth suicide in the world.

Two weeks ago a seriously mentally ill Otorohanga man killed his mother and two others, and badly injured his father – only days after his mother had requested help from Waikato DHB’s mental health services for fear of the harm her son might cause others (the request was obviously unsuccessful).

Three weeks ago, a mental health ward at Waitakere Hospital was closed due to significant staffing shortages.

Last month, a record number of ‘official’ suicides – 564 – for the most recent financial year was notified (a figure that does not include any ‘suspected’ suicides like our son’s, whose inquest has not yet been held).

In the wake of a 10-year litany of mental health horror stories, this month three DHB members, three political parties and half a million New Zealanders called for a full-scale, independent enquiry into the state of mental health care in this country.

In response, Government Minister of Health Jonathan Coleman repeated his weekly mantra: ‘there will be no enquiry…the Government is doing a fine job on mental health…we threw another $5mill at it last budget…pass me another bunch of grapes…’

Like Nero fiddling as Rome burnt, Coleman and his cronies refuse to let the problems of the outside world impinge on their enjoyment of the trappings & baubles of office.

Mental health and suicide issues don’t usually draw the sexy headline-grabbing attention of, say, Auckland house price rises or Prime Ministerial ponytail-pulling escapades, but the cumulative effect of years of the worst mental health horror stories appearing in the mainstream media and being widely spread through social media has pushed parliamentary opposition parties to join the call for change, and I predict will lead to some sort of half-baked, in-house enquiry being offered by Key and Coleman to appease the masses, within the next few months – to head off any chance of this becoming a 2017 election issue.

The trick for those in the community who see that only real and substantial change will work, will be to resist being bought off by cosmetic measures and to press on.

What shape and colour these changes, and the change process, could take will be the subject of further discussion.

Dave Macpherson is The Daily Blog’s mental health blogger and the Waikato DHB member-elect

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

High court challenge as government blunders on selling state houses while families live in cars and garages

6

screen-shot-2016-07-18-at-1-25-22-pm

The 9th of November in the Wellington High Court has been set aside for a hearing of State Housing Action Incorporated’s legal challenge to the government decision to sell 1124 state houses in Tauranga.

Last month SHA Inc. filed papers for a judicial review because we can see no way the Minister of State Housing Bill English or Social Housing Minister Paula Bennet can justify the sale in terms of the statutory objectives of the government’s so-called State Housing Reform Programme.

In other words we believe the sale is illegal. On Wednesday November the 9th the Wellington High Court will decide if it agrees.

This decision to sell to IHC (though its subsidiary Accessible Housing) is abandoning the core government responsibility of providing quality, affordable homes to families who need them in Tauranga. Over time the government sees itself abandoning this responsibility for the rest of the country as well. It is already eyeing up state houses in other areas to sell in their thousands.
This is an unbelievable betrayal of New Zealanders at a time when many thousands of families live in cars, garages or hopelessly overcrowded homes.

It’s important to repeat here that only the government has the capacity and resources to meet the housing crisis for low-income families. It can borrow money more cheaply, use economies of scale when building and has plenty of spare land capacity.

Other niche social housing providers will never be able to meet the demand. For Bill English and National this is an unconscionable decision driven by ideology.

Despite the lawyers giving their services to the challenge free of charge it is still very expensive to meet the cost of filing fees, hearing fees etc for the case.

If any readers of the Daily Blog can help with the expense of taking this challenge then please make your donation to the account number below:

Account name: State Housing Action Inc.
Kiwibank account No: 38 9018 0028715 00

We wouldn’t ask for financial help if it wasn’t so critical in taking this case.

Hope you can help.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Political Caption Competition

4

cldwwlgvaaa-o_k

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

TDB Top 5 International Stories: Monday 17th October 2016

0

Screen-Shot-2016-09-09-at-9.47.34-am

 

5: Is Trump’s Rise a Result of America Declaring War on Institutions That Make Democracy Possible?

In his new book, scholar Henry Giroux examines “America at War with Itself.” From poisoned water in Flint and other cities to the police deaths of African Americans to hatemongering on the presidential campaign trail, Henry Giroux critiques what he believes is a slide toward authoritarianism and other failings that led to the current political climate and rise of Donald Trump. Giroux is the McMaster University professor for Scholarship in the Public Interest.

Democracy Now

 

4: Iraq PM declares offensive to retake Mosul from ISIL

Iraq’s Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has announced the start of a major offensive to retake Mosul from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) group.

Mosul is Iraq’s second largest city and the last urban centre still under ISIL control in Iraq after a series of government offensives to reverse the group’s lightning-quick seizure of territory in 2014.

According to UN estimates, up to one million people could be displaced from Mosul during the operation, exacerbating the humanitarian situation in the country.

Aljazeera

3: Trump calls for pre-debate drug tests, says Clinton enhanced her performance

If Hillary Clinton seemed energetic at the start of the last presidential debate, that’s probably because she’s taking performance-enhancing drugs, according to her Republican opponent Donald Trump, who called for drug tests before Wednesday’s presidential debate in Las Vegas.

“I think she’s actually getting pumped, you want to know the truth? She’s getting pumped up,” Trump said, speaking at a campaign event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire on Saturday.

Vice News

 

2: Freed From Gag Order, Google Reveals It Received Secret FBI Subpoena

GOOGLE REVEALED WEDNESDAY it had been released from an FBI gag order that came with a secret demand for its customers’ personal information.

The FBI secret subpoena, known as a national security letter, does not require a court approval. Investigators simply need to clear a low internal bar demonstrating that the information is “relevant to an authorized investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities.”

The national security letter issued to Google was mentioned without fanfare in Google’s latest bi-annual transparency report, which includes information on government requests for data the company received from around the world in the first half of 2016.

Google received the secret subpoena in first half of 2015, according to the report.

An accompanying blog post titled “Building on Surveillance Reform,” also identified new countries that made requests — Algeria, Belarus, and Saudi Arabia among them — and reveals that Google saw an increase in requests made under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The Intercept

 

1: Trump warns of ‘rigged’ election as Giuliani makes racially charged claims

Donald Trump’s campaign allies joined his baseless accusation of a “rigged election” on Sunday, with Rudy Giuliani speaking in racially charged terms amidst growing fears of a violent backlash from supporters of the Republican presidential nominee.

Trump himself furthered the charge, tweeting: “The election is absolutely being rigged by the dishonest and distorted media pushing Crooked Hillary – but also at many polling places – SAD.”

A request for clarification from the Trump campaign about which polling places he meant was not immediately returned.

The Guardian

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Daily Blog Open Mic – Monday 17th October 2016

2

openmike

 

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

Moderation rules are more lenient for this section, but try and play nicely.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Navy secretly move function, send police to monitor peaceful protest – Peace Action Wellington

2

chgoev7uoaaetwg-jpg-large

Sunday’s Trafalgar Luncheon, part of the Navy’s 75th anniversary celebrations, was moved from its planned location in the Wellington Cadet Centre without any public notification. Despite this, a peace picnic outside the empty venue was closely monitored by two police officers.

Peace Action Wellington had planned a noisy picnic to protest the Navy’s luncheon; “War is not a cause for celebration” Peace Action Wellington spokesperson Ally Davis said. “The navy seem to have been intimdated by our peace picnic outside the Wellington Cadet Centre. The fact that they sent two police officers to monitor us having a nice time outside an empty venue is concerning. I don’t know how political parties can justify calling for extra cops when they’ve clearly been wasting their time & taxpayers money today.”

The Navy luncheon is one of a string of publicity events that the RNZN is holding throughout 2016, sponsored by companies that supply armaments and equipment to the Navy, and to the navies, armies and air forces of the world.

The anniversary includes an international flotilla of warships to visit Auckland and conduct naval exercises in November, including the first U.S warship to visit a New Zealand port for 32 years, since the country’s anti-nuclear legislation was passed.

Lockheed Martin, one of the world’s largest arms manufacturers (including the manufacture of nuclear weapons systems), is helping to sponsor these events. Lockheed Martin was paid $446 million by the New Zealand taxpayer last year to upgrade the systems on our naval vessels. and is implicated in arms sales to countries with poor human rights records, like Saudi Arabia – currently using its weapons to kill innocent civilians in Yemen.

Babcock, another sponsor, helps to maintain the N.Z. Navy fleet, but also manages nuclear submarine bases in the U.K, while Beca, sells software systems to both the New Zealand navy and to countries that use their military forces against their own people, like Myanmar and Indonesia.

“No one should profit from war,” Peace Action Wellington spokesperson Ally Davis said, “But the companies who are profiting from our Navy and sponsoring these events, are implicated in the very things that we expect New Zealand as a country to be standing up against.”

The Trafalgar luncheon, attended by Navy personnel and cadets, marks the Battle of Trafalgar (21 October) fought in 1805, when Lord Nelson’s victory over the French and the Spanish confirmed British naval supremacy. The war predates New Zealand’s colonisation and the land confiscation wars with help from the same British navy. The Trafalgar Luncheon presumably went ahead at another Wellington venue.

The 75th Anniversary marks the ‘birth’ of the ‘Royal New Zealand Navy’ in 1941, but RNZ Navy remained heavily influenced by British command for many decades.

Peace Action Wellington will be staging a series of protests leading up to the Navy exposition in Auckland in November. For more information go to www.peacewellington.org

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

YouthLaw – Informal Student Removals Report Launch

0

youthlawlogo

YouthLaw is pleased to announce, through a generous grant of the Law Foundation, the launch of our report: Barriers to Education: The rise of informal removals of students in New Zealand. The report has investigated informal barriers to education primarily through collation of student stories shared by students who have experienced informal barriers to education. Disengagement from education has proven adverse outcomes in criminal justice and social welfare sectors. YouthLaw advocates for changes to existing regulatory frameworks to increase oversight and monitoring of disciplinary processes in schools.

“Barriers to Education in New Zealand: The Rise of Informal Removals of Students in New Zealand”.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

THEATRE REVIEW: Priscilla Queen of the Desert – 4 stars

0

the-company-priscilla-queen-of-the-desert-photo-credit-paul-coltas-2

I loved the movie Priscilla Queen of the Desert. It was such a celebration of humanity, family and self-expression. The creative explosion of Sydney’s Queer culture descending upon outback Australia said more about the Lucky Country and it’s character than any other Ozzie film.

The musical had lot’s to live up to, but Christ in full drag, it delivers.

It’s a dazzle of gay anthems, clever staging, great actors and soul. The juxtaposition of queer culture and outback Australia is still powerful and works brilliantly on stage. The performances are wonderful, the singing and dancing top notch and the speed with which they must be changing costumes back stage is close to a magic act in itself.

That bloke from Neighbours is even in it.

The final song is a wonderful salute to all that is Australian and there are not many times that I can recall when the entire Civic gives a standing ovation.

The musical is as much a celebration of the individual, family and humanity as the movie – you walk away with that deeper understanding of those who dare to be different and does as much to erode homophobia as your average Pride festival.

Which leaves me with one puzzle. For a country that can produce a movie and musical as wonderful as this, that champions Sydney as the Gay capital of the South Pacific, how and why on Earth is Australia still so far behind the rest of the developed world when it comes to gay marriage?

That sad fact is a reminder of why so many more people need to see the musical.

4 stars 

Currently running at the Civic in Auckland – book now as this will sell out

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

GUEST BLOG: Arthur Taylor – Explosive new allegations inside SERCO’s Wiri prison

8

screen-shot-2016-10-09-at-9-49-00-am

House Block one in Wiri has become infested with gang members, i.e. K.C’s Killer Beez and Crips, and they are causing the same problems they cause elsewhere if they have the numbers, jumping other prisoners, 3 or 4 on one, Tea Leafing (stealing other prisoners property), organizing fights, pressuring others to join in fight clubs and generally trying to run the place to their own ends.

When neutrals, (non gang members) complain to staff about whats going on, or even when they get assaulted, the staff are covering it up, and not filing incident reports and CCtv footage goes “missing”.

In one case I’m aware of prisoner James Williams was quite seriously assaulted in House Block 3 , had a bogus charge brought against him making out he was the aggressor, (the inspector of Corrections ordered the charge dropped when he found out) had his security classification upped from minimum to maximum security and was transferred here to Pare` to keep it all hush – hush.

As soon as he arrived, the staff here realised (the unit manager) immediately that no way he should be maximum and had him sent to the Special Needs Unit, as he is in reality a vunerable prisoner.

 

Arthur Taylor is The Daily Blog’s Prisoner Rights Blogger and is currently at Pare

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Giving Workers What They Want: Honouring The Legacy Of Helen Kelly

2

unnamed

WHAT BETTER TIME could there be to talk about Kiwi workers’ rights than in the days following Helen Kelly’s death? Who has contributed more to this discussion than the NZ Council of Trade Unions’ (CTU) first female President? And what other contemporary New Zealand trade unionist’s passing could have left such large and stylish shoes to fill?

Few would dispute that Kelly was by far the best leader that the CTU has so far produced. The way she was able to combine rock-solid principle with PR smarts made her the labour movement’s most effective twenty-first century union boss. Though she couldn’t quite match the Unite union’s Matt McCarten at street-level campaigning, Kelly’s keen intellect and her winning ways with the news media allowed her to keep the ideals of trade unionism alive in an era notoriously hostile to the claims of collectivism.

Had she not succumbed to lung cancer, it is likely that well before the end of this decade she would have made the transition from the trade union movement to the Parliamentary Labour Party. Once in Parliament, her rise to the top would have been inexorable. In relatively short order New Zealand would have had its second Labour Prime Minister called Helen.

All of which makes it one the great counterfactual questions of our history: “How different would New Zealand have been if Helen Kelly had not died of cancer at the tragically young age of fifty-two?” It is only when we attempt to answer that question that the true magnitude of the nation’s loss is brought home to us.

Labour has made great play of its current Future of Work exercise, but it has been much less enthusiastic about discussing the future of workplace relations. Indeed, Grant Robertson seems much more comfortable discussing how vital it is that workers are made ready for the challenges of the so-called “Fourth Industrial Revolution”. We hear a great deal about the importance of continuous upskilling and labour flexibility, but nothing like as much about ensuring employees have a genuine say in how much they are paid and under what conditions they work.

For a party calling itself “Labour”, this is a critical deficiency. The power relationships of the workplace have a huge impact on people’s well-being. How much we earn and how we work continue to dominate our existence in much the same way that they have done since the first industrial revolution. More so in the first quarter of the twenty-first century than in the second half of the twentieth, because the effective destruction of mass trade union membership in the 1980s and 90s swung the balance-of-power decisively in the employers’ favour.

Anyone raising these issues, however, will be told that they are living in the past, and that the world has changed too much for any social-democratic party to contemplate a return to the industrial relations regime of the 1970s. And it’s true, times have changed: although not enough, apparently, to destroy the master/servant relationship, or eliminate the commercial necessity of legally limited liability; but certainly enough to make joining a union a career-threatening move for 90 percent of private sector employees.

The most important challenge facing today’s Labour Party is how to render workplace power relationships more equal without mobilising the entire neoliberal establishment against it. Simply legislating for the restoration of compulsory unionism and industry-wide contracts is not the answer, because a change of government would instantly bring about their legal demise.

The truth of the matter is that restoring equality in the workplace will not be accomplished by top-down, bureaucratic, institutional solutions. To enjoy the confidence and active support of ordinary working people, a fit-for-purpose, twenty-first century system of employment relations would need to have emerged from a consultative exercise of unprecedented size and thoroughness. In the simplest terms: it would need to be the product of the workers themselves.

Such an exercise would need to be established and protected by legislation. The body responsible – let’s call it WorkRight NZ – would aim to, and be empowered to, approach as many working people as possible in their workplaces and have them fill in a comprehensive questionnaire intended to identify both the good and bad aspects of working life in twenty-first century New Zealand. The survey would also ask workers how their rights, as citizens and employees, might best be protected and exercised within the workplace.

The WorkRight NZ legislation would also establish a second investigative unit, dedicated to drawing upon the knowledge and experience of existing trade union and employer organisations; the experiences of employers, unions and working people in other countries; and the research and insights of New Zealand and overseas academic employment relations specialists. The goal of this investigative unit would be to establish local and international best practice in relation to collective bargaining.

The results of the consultative exercise would then be collated, analysed and written up in the form of a comprehensive report by WorkRight NZ. Contained within the report would be a draft bill, incorporating the participants principal recommendations, for presentation to Parliament.

Interestingly, a similar exercise in mass inquiry was undertaken by the First Labour Government. The Social Survey Bureau was set up in 1937 to discover the actual conditions prevailing in New Zealand’s farms, factories, shops, offices and homes. Its first major inquiry – into the living conditions of dairy farmers – produced such shocking findings, however, that the responsible cabinet minister, Peter Fraser, tried to suppress the research report and, when that failed, shut the Bureau down.

Asking the right questions has always been the essence of political radicalism. It’s what made Helen Kelly such an effective trade union leader. If the CTU and the Labour Party are looking for a way to honour her legacy, then finding out what workers want from their employers and their workplaces – and giving it to them – would be a great place to start.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Political Caption Competition

8

screen-shot-2016-10-03-at-9-02-29-am

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

TDB Top 5 International Stories: Sunday 16th October 2016

1

Screen-Shot-2016-09-09-at-9.47.34-am

5: Breaking: ND Prosecutor Seeks “Riot” Charges Against Amy Goodman For Reporting On Pipeline Protest

 

A North Dakota state prosecutor has sought to charge award-winning journalist Amy Goodman with participating in a “riot” for filming an attack on Native American-led anti-pipeline protesters. The new charge comes after the prosecutor dropped criminal trespassing charges.

State’s Attorney Ladd R Erickson filed the new charges on Friday before District Judge John Grinsteiner who will decide on Monday (October 17) whether probable cause exists for the riot charge.

Goodman has travelled to North Dakota to face the charges and will appear at Morton County court on Monday at 1:30 pm local time (CDT) if the charges are approved.

“I came back to North Dakota to fight a trespass charge. They saw that they could never make that charge stick, so now they want to charge me with rioting, ” said Goodman. “I wasn’t trespassing, I wasn’t engaging in a riot, I was doing my job as a journalist by covering a violent attack on Native American protesters.”

In an e-mail to Goodman’s attorney Tom Dickson on October 12, State’s Attorney Erickson admitted that there were “legal issues with proving the notice of trespassing requirements in the statute.” In an earlier email on October 12, Erickson wrote that Goodman “was not acting as a journalist,” despite that fact that the state’s criminal complaint recognized that, “Amy Goodman can be seen on the video …interviewing protesters.” In that email Erikson justified his quote in the Bismarck Tribune in which he had said that “She’s [Amy Goodman] a protester, basically. Everything she reported on was from the position of justifying the protest actions.” The First Amendment, of course, applies irrespective of the content of a reporter’s story.

Democracy Now

 

4:  Tony Abbott Takes to Twitter in Defence of Donald Trump

Just when you thought you’d never have to see an elected politician use the term “haters,” former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has come to the defence of Donald Trump on Twitter.

“Before the Trump haters get too excited,” Abbott tweeted after a controversial interview with Sky News’ Paul Murray Live on Thursday night, labelling Trump’s economic and national defence policies as “classic conservatism.” While the former PM acknowledged some of Trump’s views are “OTT” he was firm that boosting defence spending and lowering taxes were central tenets to conservative politics.

Abbott was hugely critical of a motion that passed through New South Wales’ state Senate, which labelled Trump a “revolting slug.” The former PM told Sky that “many of the Trump positions are reasonable enough.”

Vice News

 

3: Life after Trump: Republicans brace for betrayal and civil war after 2016

Accusations of betrayal. Demagoguery and hatred. The bunker in Berlin. Comparisons with Adolf Hitler have been tempting throughout Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign for the presidency – never more so than at its mad, destructive climax.

The Republican’s presidential bid appears to have become the campaign equivalent of the last days of the reich, when Germany’s leadership raged at bearers of bad news from the battlefield, ordered non-existent divisions to launch counteroffensives, and embraced a nihilistic plan to burn it all down and take everyone along.

The difference is, unlike then, there seems to be little awareness of impending defeat or understanding of how it came to be. Instead, attitudes are like those after the first world war when Germans on the far right coined a word for their myth of betrayal: Dolchstoßlegende.

The Guardian

 

2: D.C. Hivemind Mulls How Clinton Can Pass Huge Corporate Tax Cut

TREATING THE WHOLE voting thing as a formality, serious political players are now pondering how exactly President Hillary Clinton can pass what Sen. Elizabeth Warren has called “a giant wet kiss for tax dodgers.”

This discussion isn’t happening on television, where normal people would hear about it. Or on Reddit, where people would freak out about it. To the degree it’s taking place in public at all, it surfaces in elite publications, where only elites are paying attention.

For instance, Peter Orszag, a top Obama economic official before he left to cash in with Citigroup, just wrote an op-ed in the Financial Times on how to make the wet kiss happen.

Few regular Americans read the Financial Times, and even if they did, what Orszag says requires a little deciphering:

What, then, are the prospects for new initiatives in a Clinton administration? … Mrs Clinton has … proposed $275bn in new infrastructure spending over five years, $250bn in direct federal spending and $25bn to set up an infrastructure bank. The question is how to finance this spending.

Deficit financing may be sensible but is anathema to House Republicans. So additional revenue from corporate income tax is commonly proposed. And that is where things become difficult.

There is some bipartisan agreement — for example, that profits already accumulated overseas by US companies should be subject to a tax rate well below the statutory 35 per cent, regardless of whether those profits are repatriated. But there is little consensus on whether such a tax should also apply in future and what the rate should be. …

To create room for the necessary compromises, Mrs Clinton would do well to avoid too many fights with her own party about whom she appoints to her administration. Some senior congressional Democrats on the left are already preparing to oppose “hell no” candidates who have worked in finance. If Mrs Clinton largely defers to them, however misguided their approach, she may end up with more flexibility to negotiate later with a Republican Congress.

The Intercept

1: Syria’s war: Lausanne meeting fails to break deadlock

A new round of diplomatic talks has failed once again to break a tense deadlock on how to end fighting in Syria, as a nine-nation meeting in the Swiss city of Lausanne did not agree on any concrete action to stop the violence.

With clashes still raging in Aleppo, Saturday’s talks, convened by US Secretary of State John Kerry, concluded after more than four hours without any joint statement from the participating countries.
Inside Story – More peace talks over Syria, but can they end the war?
Kerry was seeking a new path to peace after failing to secure a ceasefire in direct talks with Russia amid increasing international outrage over the Russian and Syrian bombardment of Aleppo’s rebel-held east.

Aljazeera

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service