Netanyahu should have been arrested at the UN for war crimes, not able to give a speech defending his war crimes
It was righteous that the vast majority of the UN walked out of the room when Netanyahu walked in.
That’s the appropriate response to a war criminal.
There is an open War Crime warrant for Netanyahu, he should have been arrested at the UN for genocide, not given an opportunity to defend his genocide!
He has allowed a level of war crime so extreme they technically breach the legal definition of genocide.
His army shoots children in the head.
Sexually torture prisoners.
Train dogs to sexually torture prisoners.
Bomb women and children.
They have butchered over 21000 children.
“The most moral army in the world”. He fucking said that.
He is so delusional.
He conned Trump into the Iranian War because Trump wanted the Epstein Files out of the news headlines.
That has burnt Trump ever since because no US Administration was ever dumb enough to feed Netanyahu’s Iran war fantasies.
Israel is a pariah state. A rogue Zionist Fascist regime whose brutal oppression of the Palestinian people has mutilated the Oppressor as much as it has the Oppressed.
It is shameful that Netanyahu wasn’t seized and arrested.
Independent Media is more important than ever, especially in the lead up to the Election. TDB is the largest Left Wing Blog in NZ and we have been operating for 13 years. We get zero funding from NZonAir and we don’t have no rich backers. If you can donate please do so here or directly into our account –12-3065-0133561-56
I just dropped this comment over at Kiwi Blog ,,, I don’t approve of ‘AI slop’ and it’s tendency to hallucinate ( make things up ) ….. But if you ask the right questions and frame them in the right way it can give answers which are half decent …..
If Farrar lets the comment through his pack of flockers ( posters ) can bleat and argue with the AI … which I believe is Chinese 😉
p.s I had to edit it down by quite a lot
******************************************************************************************
Two points with this post ,,,, AI used in New Zealand education could be a good teaching aid…. and Netanyahu is a criminal clown.
Question –: Using the example of ‘ a jury ‘, which is the bedrock by which guilt or innocence is judged in serious criminal trials such as murder or rape ,,, if a hypothetical jury were to be comprised of genocide scholars , human rights organisations , genuine aid organisations ( that excludes USAID ) , and medical organisations such as red cross / red crescent and Médecins Sans Frontières ,, then what is the likely verdict if this group comprised a jury and passed judgement on Israel for the crime of committing genocide?
AI answer …. The hypothetical jury’s verdict would be guilty — not a close call, but a near-unanimous finding. Here’s how each “juror” has voted:
The IAGS (International Association of Genocide Scholars), the world’s largest professional association , with 86% of members agreeing & declaring that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza “meet the legal definition of genocide” under Article II of the 1948 Genocide Convention. Individual scholars ( two Israeli’s ) have been even more explicit: Omer Bartov (Holocaust and genocide studies, former IDF) reached his “inescapable conclusion” in July 2025; Raz Segal called it “a textbook case of genocide unfolding in front of our eyes” as early as October 2023.
Human rights organisations
Amnesty International published a 296-page report in December 2024 concluding Israel “has committed and is continuing to commit genocide,” documenting three of the five prohibited acts under the Genocide Convention with specific genocidal intent. Human Rights Watch followed days later with a 179-page report finding Israel committed “acts of genocide”. In July 2025, two Israeli organisations — B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel — became the first Israeli bodies to reach the same conclusion.
Aid organisations (excluding USAID)
Major international aid groups issued a joint statement in September 2025 calling on world leaders to act, stating: “What we are witnessing in Gaza is not only an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe, but what the UN Commission of Inquiry has now concluded is a genocide.”
Medical organisations
MSF (Doctors Without Borders) has been the most blunt: “In short, we are witnessing a genocide.” Its September 2025 campaign was titled “Doctors Can’t Stop Genocide — World Leaders Can.” Its director general Claire Magone described it as “a loud and clear genocide.”. A June 2026 MSF report titled “This is not aid. This is orchestrated killing” documented what it called a system of “institutionalised starvation and dehumanization ( this report was in relation to the World Kitchen Fraud, which at it’s ‘peak’ was supplying 16% of Gaza’s need,,, it’s first 175 days and 42 million meals worked out as 1 meal per person every 8 days if we accept a 2 million population figure,,, If the population was lower than that then Israel must have killed A LOT more people than the low ball official toll ).
The “judge’s” summary
The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry (September 2025) found Israel guilty of four out of five acts specified in Article II of the Genocide Convention — and found statements by senior Israeli officials sufficient to establish genocidal intent.
So the hypothetical jury wouldn’t be deliberating. Every category of juror has already returned the same verdict on the same evidence. The only remaining question, in their framing, is why the “court” (i.e., the international community) has not enforced the ruling….
Please note the AI ( and myself ) use the legal definition of genocide ,,,, as that’s the only one which counts when charged with the crime.
New Zealands representative did not join in with the mass walk out when the chief Genocider Netanyahu gave his campaign speech written for the ears of Israel voters ( the majority of which support genocide against Palestinians ), instead the NZ rep stuck with our NAct governments position, which is sticking with Israel no matter what they do….. “New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade told RNZ a senior official from its delegation was “present for the duration of the speech”.
It is unclear if our representative laughed at the bits which were supposed to be funny, or if they applauded at the bits where supporters of Israel were meant to show their support.
…. Another day of shame from MFAT soiling NZ’s reputation and international standing.
How hilarious we didnt even make it onto bibis list of countries that stayed and walked out, how embarrassing we cant even make a list of a handful of countries when we lick a boot
The cops were too busy arresting genocide protestors to enforce the ICC warrant
Well said MB – plus Netanyahu had the audacity, or should I say ignorance to say during the walk out, starting at 1:18 – “…before I begin, just a quick announcement. If there are any other moral cowards who haven’t yet left this hall, please do so now…”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/361038026/mass-walkout-un-netanyahu-takes-podium
I would not call Netanyahu a moral coward, I would call him an immoral coward as well as an ignorant bully.