Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One Comment

  1. Lowering the age of registration but not lowering the age of franchise, is patronising.
    Teaching civics but not allowing the practice of civics is demoralising.

    I remember the humiliating mock election debates for faux candidates that we were forced to participate in at high school.
    In my opinion nothing would be more detrimental to democratic engagement than by younger people than patronising them with the limited reforms proposed by the McGuinness Institute.

    Every single one of the arguments for lowering the age of registration made by the McGuinness Institute can be made for lowering the age of franchise.

    How is our democracy served by these half arsed reforms?

    Why does the McGuiness Institute want everyone from age 15 up to be recorded on the electoral roll, but with no right to representation?

    Are these reforms more about surveilance than democracy?

    The massive School Strike for the climate proved that young New Zealanders have the ability to organise politically and want and deserve to have their views counted, they don’t deserve to be patronised or have their opinions ignored.