“ok so just to do some clarification on Fairway Resolution aka DRSL the crown-owned company.

FairWay Resolution (www.drsl.co.nz), is a crown-owned company which originated as a division of the Accident Compensation Corporation and carries out reviews of claims against Accident Compensation Corporation by accident compensation claimants.

See:

DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICE CHANGES NAME TO FAIRWAY RESOLUTION
http://www.fairwayre…me%20Change.pdf

“The company began as a division of the Accident Compensation Corporation, carrying out reviews of claims against the Corporation by accident compensation claimants. Incorporated in 1999 as a stand-alone entity under the ownership of ACC, it became an independent Crown-owned Company in 2011.”…

and

…”FairWay Resolution manages the legislated decision review system for the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). We also provide alternative dispute resolution services to the ACC, such as facilitation and mediation. For more, see our ACC reviews and disputes section.”

Now, I cant stress this enough if people cant get this and I really want people to take a minute and honestly think about this. The above by itself totally negates any logical perspective of independent and objective investigation, analysis or “fair” mediation process. In fact it shows emphatically that FairWay Resolution, the crown-owned company, is actually fronting as being an “independent” mediation organisation that has conflicts of interest through its direct connection to the Accident Compensation Corporation, both being commissioned and funded by the crown as government agencies defending government agencies.

How do people not get this?

You see what they have done is compartmentalized ACC into a section designed to defend itself, then changed their name (a couple of times – doesn’t ‘Fairway Resolution’ have a nice sound to it? Good job the public relations department). This is designed to give what is commonly referred to as “illusion of choice.” So just to explain this in more detail.

A corporation divides itself in two and sets up a “good cop versus bad cop” scenario situation. This is where the two parties are actually one in the same, one acting as the “Savior” for the claimant against the other which represents the corporation, when in fact they BOTH work for the same higher agenda up the ladder (or pyramid if you like to use that symbology). So in order for this to work and to sell this to you they really need to distance themselves from the original corporation. This is called a “distancing” technique and it operates to provide the facade of separation and dissociation. For example someone might call themselves “so over sensitiveclaimsunit” in order to distance themselves from the Sensitive Claims Unit so that sexual abuse victims will find a connection and such a name appealing when looking for help. These are predatory – prey mentality techniques. So anyway these things are a set-up designed for people to buy into, it doesnt work unless you believe in it and they appear to look truly independent, objective and to have your best interests at heart etc. Political parties do this all the time when its all corporate controlled. Remember ministers only ever administer duties/policies on behalf of the crown, they are public relations frontmen (think about that when you vote next).

So after making inquiries with Fairway Resolutions it became evident that even the crown owned company FairWay Resolution does not even have the ability to investigate complaints within its own departments (in exactly the same manner ACC is incapable of doing so within its own departments) independently and objectively, nor is it capable of performing a fair mediation process or evaluating client complaints against the Accident Compensation Corporation with their appointed judges (actually lawyers) that are trained through the ACC/FairWay Resolution for defending ACC against claimants. The whole “mediation process” is a sham and a fraud, so don’t expect any mediation as its basically just lawyers working as ACC employees (and ACC don’t even bother to show up as themselves, they do the whole show through telecommunications – which courts have not been impressed by at all). The Fairway mediator is to be considered acting as the designated ACC representative for this process.

To be taken into consideration by the claimant is the fact that Accident Compensation Corporation does not even bother to physically turn up to these mediations, only doing them via phone conferencing (which is an insult especially to an SCU client – at least their sexual perpetrators looked them in the face while they were being …) and also that ACC/Fairway Resolution have given themselves the right to record the “mediation” for their own purposes, however for you the claimant NO media and/or journalists are allowed and are forbidden from attending, etc etc the list goes on (not to mention the claimants that are institutionalised and funds are recovered from). So again and again these do not reflect anything fair in a mediation process but simply a fixed one-sided approach on behalf of the corporation, definitely not the client – lets not kid ourselves here.

Having repeatedly requested for the contact details of the an independent complaints investigator for Fairway Resolution to be provided through a telephone
conversation with Magnus 04-918-4974, Resolution Co-ordinator this information was not available instead referring me to Hannes 09-915-8220, General Manager. So
please, I really encourage people to think and do their own research. Please ring Magnus 04-918-4974, Resolution Co-ordinator and Hannes 09-915-8220, General Manager and ask the appropriate questions. I have already given the answers you will recieve.

The corporation is so rife with corrupt individuals as are advocates on this site, but if you know what to look for you can avoid learning from your own mistakes (learn from others its easier!). Many of these people are already predisposed towards psychopathic personality disorders, simply meaning they are limited in compassion towards others and have a predatory mentality to vulnerable prey/victims. These individuals also have characteristics involving control over others, psychological bullying, are demeaning and condescending and any promises they make are often not backed up by actions (always remember actions speak louder than words).

The higher up the corporate ladder/pyramid the more extreme the psychopathic personality disorder becomes. This is an actual requirement for advancing and I am being serious. If you doubt the use of the word “psychopathic” just remember that ACC uses dr Felicity Goodyear-Smith as an ACC advisor of matters of sexual abuse knowing full well her connections to child sex abuse paedophile trafficking rings such as the Centrepoint commune/cult and her relationships with convicted child sex offenders, her making such statments as “children seek out sex with adults” and that she has been used to legally defend child sex abusers in courts of law. What else do you really need to know? This is called covering-up child sex abuse pedophilia by crown corporations. Lets not bandy words here, they know it, I know it and so should everyone else, especially SCU clients, as they are continually being re-victimised by the ACC SCU corporation. Psychopathic personality disorders and pedophilia go hand-in-hand, both being mutually inclusive, are to be found together as companions. I sincerely hope people grasp the magnitude of this as some do appear to be finding this difficult to comprehend.

Conflicting interests? Felicity Goodyear-Smith – BY TIM HUME
http://www.stuff.co….cting-interests

How Powerful (New Zealand) Families Groom Children For Sex & Cover it up KAREN “ATLANTIS” ROSE 6 February 2014
http://www.thevinnye…n-atlantis-rose

These psychopathic personality disorders are not just limited to assessors such as jan reeves, peter dean, senior peer reviewer john collier etc (who just reference each others assessments back and forth), these are just the ones that ACC use to fabricate the material to get SCU claimants on the Exit Strategy and child sexual abuse documentation off the record. There are data analysts who have and are collating the patterns and techniques employed by these people. They all have their own roles, even case managers who if they cant hack it or don’t have required characteristics, tend to have a very high turnover rate. It is all a very well executed process and these kind of people are on this forum also, they’re not hard to find. Just take note of how they treat and react to people when they get angry and stressed out or how they treat you once you have been used and you see just how they compromise the masquerade they put on and show their true Natures. These people themselves will often find themselves sold out by those above them (because that’s just how the psychopathic parasitical pyramid works).

Don’t believe me, do your own homework.

If you have negative experiences with such people and corporations please step-up and warn others so that they do not have to be abused in this process. Had we been aware of this I would have insisted my wife would NEVER have seen an ACC counselor for therapy to help with her dealing with lifelong childhood sexual abuse within recognized (within legal court) New Zealand pedophilia rings in the first instance.

Also don’t let the experiences through dealing with this corporation make you loose sleep or affect your health, don’t let them get the best of you – its just not worth that much 😉

“The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.” – Albert Einstein

references:

http://accforum.org/forums/index.php?/topic/16378-who-and-what-is-fairway-resolution/page__pid__186400#entry186400

http://accforum.org/forums/index.php?/topic/16379-conflicting-interests-required-reading-for-all-sensitive-claims-unit-clients/

Opinion and belief

“Of the zillion other possible ways to react, why choose “… “but not all men”?”

this is the gut reaction

“Why not choose to say “I’m with you. what can I do?”

this is the considered reaction

And if its such an understood thing – why does it keep being mis-understood?

“Or hell, why not simple shut up and listen?” –

which is exactly my point – if we want other men to actually listen we need to stop condeming them based on the gut reaction alone.
Which is why im suggesting all of us might get further in this if we stop slinging genetic blame and talk solutions

Key would have loved the rugby club that the eight guys belonged to who raped and severely bashed a gay friend of mine. Those guys would never apologise for being men. Sometimes I think rugby union is at least half the problem in our country – from sexual violence to racism, it has so often been on the wrong side.

Hey Lara thanks so much for reading my stuff and your kind words <3

Not sure about Chch Rape Crisis, but I believe Chch Womens’ Refuge has closed because the Govt withdrew funding in the budget. So much for Paula Benefit’s “extra funding for Womens’ Refuges” that she claimed on The Nation this morning.

Rio Tinto got it instead.

McCully mustn’t shirk scrutiny during inquiry

The inquiry into Foreign Affairs’ handling of allegations of attempted rape by a Malaysian diplomat must investigate all the actions taken by Murray McCully during this fiasco, Green Party Co-leader Metiria Turei said today.

A Ministerial inquiry has been launched into the way the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) handled the case involving a Malaysian diplomat. However, the terms of reference do not extend to what actions Mr McCully took in relation to the case.

“The terms of reference for this inquiry are very specific when it comes to investigating the actions of MFAT officials,” Mrs Turei said.

“Unfortunately the terms of reference fail to hold the Minister of Foreign Affairs to account.

“These terms of reference must be upgraded to cover all the actions, or more to the point inactions, taken by Mr McCully.

“Mr McCully has been known as a micro-manager throughout his career.

“Now, the New Zealand public is being asked to believe that Mr McCully allowed a New Zealand citizen to be denied justice and a major diplomatic fiasco to evolve, while he sat on his hands.

“The inquiry needs to be wide enough to investigate whether or not Mr McCully was guilty of incompetence or something worse.

“Mr McCully’s line so far has been that he did nothing wrong. If that is correct, then he should open the investigation up to include his own actions.

“New Zealanders expect those in power to take responsibility when things go wrong.

“The Prime Minister shouldn’t be relaxed about this inquiry. He needs to make sure his Minister’s actions are properly scrutinised,” said Mrs Turei.

Subject: Justice