<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Catastrophic Climate Change is far more likely than we comprehend	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/catastrophic-climate-change-is-far-more-likely-than-we-comprehend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thedailyblog.co.nz/catastrophic-climate-change-is-far-more-likely-than-we-comprehend/</link>
	<description>Read the Other Side of the Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 23:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bozo		</title>
		<link>https://thedailyblog.co.nz/catastrophic-climate-change-is-far-more-likely-than-we-comprehend/#comment-329791</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bozo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 23:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thedailyblog.co.nz/?p=205296#comment-329791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Agreed. How resources are used, the generation and consumption of energy, patterns of consumption, the very economics that are predicated on the current paradigm; all this has gotta change ... and not only because of the consequences of global warming and climate change.

Mitigation or adaptation? Reducing/ stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions to slow the rate of climate change, or adjusting to the now real impacts? That&#039;s the science. And the politics. But the elephant in the room looms large.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. How resources are used, the generation and consumption of energy, patterns of consumption, the very economics that are predicated on the current paradigm; all this has gotta change &#8230; and not only because of the consequences of global warming and climate change.</p>
<p>Mitigation or adaptation? Reducing/ stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions to slow the rate of climate change, or adjusting to the now real impacts? That&#8217;s the science. And the politics. But the elephant in the room looms large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
