Allan Alach – The Biggest Lie You’ve Been Told

Do you have a feeling that we’ve been mislead for decades by the western governments, including our own? That things are not what we have been, and are still being, told? That many of our political parties are still telling the same lies to mislead us?
In that case case, watch this video “The Biggest Lie You’ve Been Told” by UK journalist Owen Jones:
This video is an introduction to a book ‘The Fall of the West – How They Really Lost It ’ that Jones has just published (details at the foot of the video).
For those of you who don’t know of Owen Jones, he is a very active voice on the left in Britain. Once a Labour Party member, he has since left the party due to his disgust over Keir Starmer (now Andy Burnham) and over Labour’s current policies.
Jones opens the video with this statement. You may be able to draw connections between this and some of our own politicians.
“This is the biggest lie you’ve ever been told. It’s a lie about why the world you’ve always known, the world you grew up in is falling apart. You’re told the West is being destroyed by migrants. They’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, by minorities. Are we talking about Muslims here?
We are.
By people who supposedly hate our way of life. Everything that made Britain great is being destroyed by an establishment that hates Britain and hates the West.
But who closed the factories? Who crashed the banks? Who launched the wars? The people responsible would much rather you blame someone else? In fact, the politicians and billionaires shouting loudest about the fall of the West championed many of the policies that brought it about in the first place. That’s the argument of my new book, The Fall of the West, how they really lost it.’
In his research for this book, Jones travelled extensively around the world, as he says, to ‘track down the people who saw the disaster coming and who were ignored.’
He then makes another argument:
‘The decline of Western dominance doesn’t have to mean worse lives for ordinary people. Losing an empire and losing a decent future are not the same thing.’
Jones then discusses how events in Russia in the 1990s sent us a warning.
‘It’s 1994 and an American diplomat sends Washington a warning. It’s ignored with catastrophic consequences.
His name was Wayne Murray. No anti-capitalist dissident. He was chief political analyst at the US embassy in Moscow. He was there when the Soviet Union collapsed.
Imagine what that moment was like in Washington and here in London. The Cold War was over. The West had won. Now it would remake Russia in its own image. Sell off public assets, slash the state, let private fortunes grow.
Murray traveled around Russia and he saw something very different happening. He told me how as living standards collapsed, he carried money in his pockets to give to old women begging in the street. They were starving.’
And:
‘Democracy and human rights were what the West promised, but the West’s real priority was ruthless capitalism.’
You know the story – slash government spending, remove restrictions on capitalists, sell assets off to oligarchs etc etc. You know what happened to Russia, as it did to New Zealand, the UK, and every other country where unfettered neoliberalism was set loose.
Jones then discusses the history of US/Western intervention in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.
‘You destroyed Iraq.
That’s what an Iraqi man told me when he found out I was British, as I walked the streets of Baghdad with Iraqi journalist Kaith Abdul Ahad.
Everywhere we went, the dead looked down from street corners, walls, and shop fronts. Forget the lies about weapons of mass destruction for a moment.
Iraq was sitting on around a tenth of the world’s proven oil reserves. Once Saddam Hussein was overthrown, Paul Bremer, the American administrator no Iraqi had elected, opened most of the economy to full foreign ownership with profits free to leave the country.
The occupation promised them freedom while deciding without their consent who could own their economy. Iraq’s oil revenues went into an account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
And in 2020, when Iraq’s parliament demanded US troops leave, Washington reportedly threatened to restrict access to that account. You could vote, but challenge American power and your own resources could be used against you.’
Nothing has changed given the way the Trump regime is stealing Venezuela’s oil.
Jones next turns his attention to the effects of Thatcherism on the UK.
‘Take Sheffield, where I was born, and where I went back for this book. Before Thatcher, unemployment was 4%. By 1984, the year I was born, that had risen to nearly 1 in 6 of Sheffield’s population. A local newspaper reported a Sheffield jobs massacre.
Meanwhile, the stock exchange has reached record levels. The factories closed. The city boomed.
Two sides of the same transformation.’
If there is one thing that really annoys me, it is the use of the stock market as an indicator of financial well-being. Trump does that all the time, as proof of the success of his administration. The same goes in New Zealand and certainly did back in the heyday of Rogernomics – there was even a nightly segment on TV news reporting on the current share price (from memory it was called the Barclay’s Index).
The share market has no relevance to the great majority of citizens who are struggling to keep their head above the financial waters. It’s merely a way for the rich to speculate and so become even richer.
Even today, you will notice that the “ECONOMY” is all the National and ACT parties mention.
Too bad if the general public are struggling to make ends meet, that hospital care is a farce, that our public transport is crap, and so on, as long as the ‘ECONOMY’ is growing i.e., the already well off are making even more money at the expense of the rest of us.
Quality of life for all citizens and residents of New Zealand? Yeah, right.
The downside of this relentless focus on neoliberal capitalism is, of course, things can go wrong and financial crashes occur that threaten to destroy the assets of the wealthy.
Never mind, the government will step in and use taxpayers’ money to bail them out.
The irony here being that the wealthy use every trick they can to avoid paying tax and moan like hell when they get hit with a tax they can’t avoid. Happy to take but not happy to pay their share.
‘The system was protected by a dogma. There is no alternative. Critics could be dismissed as cranks, dinosaurs, and losers.
When wages weren’t enough, people borrowed. Banks repackaged those risky loans into supposedly safe investments and sold them around the world.
In 2008, it all came crashing down. Then came the rescue.
The banks got public money.
The public got austerity. Instead of changing the system that had failed, governments made people pay to restore it.
Nowhere was this more devastating than Greece. German and French banks had lent recklessly. But when it all broke, Greeks were told they had lived beyond their means, and much of the bailout money went straight back out to those same banks.
Greeks inherited the bill.’
New Zealand is no exception. Look at the policies of this current government.
Who is paying the price for the money being shuffled upwards to the already rich?
You are.
‘Greece was the extreme case, but all over the west, people suffered economic and social devastation.
In Germany and Austria, I saw the political consequences. People knew something had gone badly wrong.
The far right offered an explanation and crucially someone to blame. Your wages aren’t enough.
Your public services are falling apart.
But don’t look at the wealth piling up at the top. There’s no alternative to that.
Remember, look at the migrants supposedly taking your share.’
Does that remind you of a particular populist New Zealand politician?.
Jones then discusses the horrific situation in Palestine, which I’m sure you are familiar with, so I won’t highlight what he says.
Gaza is the latest example of western brutalism and this has consequences.
‘The writer Amos Azer called it the boomerang effect. The brutality Europe inflicted on its colonies came home as fascism. Normalize lawlessness against other people and you create habits, justifications, and instruments of repression that can be turned against your own.
The war on terror made torture, mass surveillance, and imprisonment without trial acceptable in the name of security. Under Trump, its language and machinery were turned on migrants, protesters, and political opponents.’
Further:
‘Trumpism is both a symptom and an accelerant of western decline. It feeds on the damage done by the old order and it gives the wealthy more power while turning anger against anyone who challenges them.
The elites who once promised us the end of history are now preparing for the end of the world, like Peter Thiel who bought a 477 acre bolt hole in New Zealand.
Luxury bunkers now come with gyms, spars, and artificial sunrises. The richest people on Earth no longer imagine preventing catastrophe.
They imagine buying their way out of it.
But no bunker can stabilize the climate, save the harvests, or recreate the society on which even a billionaire depends. That is one possible future. Safety for a privileged few, walls and violence for everybody else.’
The wealthy will look after themselves. Remember Luxon said “I’m wealthy, I’m sorted.”
‘The answer to the fall of the West is not to rebuild Western supremacy, but to rebuild society.
And that solidarity cannot stop at our borders. A decent life here cannot be built on the destruction of somebody else’s life elsewhere.’
Jones then returns to discussing the tragedy in Palestine.
He concludes:
‘Everything you’ve just heard is a fraction of what’s in the book. The interviews, the classified documents, the astonishing facts and figures, the reporting from countries I haven’t even mentioned here.’
The link is in the description. If you want to know who really broke the world you grew up in, read it and send this to someone who’s been told to blame all the wrong people.’
I have already put in a request for the library to buy a copy – that way others can also get to read it. Suggest you do the same.
We need to look at the current election cycle in New Zealand through the lens that Jones provides. We’ve been fed, and are still being fed, the same story that he describes.
Three of our political parties (I’m sure you can work out who they are) are still peddling the neoliberal line about austerity being needed to balance our books, even though they won’t actually do anything about the inequities in our society, and indeed have policies to make it worse. According to them, it is the poor peoples’ fault for their situation, that all they need to do is to get off their butts and get a job. Too bad if the pay rates are so poor there is no way they can get ahead financially.
On top of that we have New Zealand First using the exact blaming the migrants line that Jones discusses.
If this lot get voted back in, we will get what we deserve for being so ignorant.
On the other hand it would help if the Labour Party would find their own spine and actually provide voters reasons to vote for them other than the old ‘we’re better than National’ line they’ve used ever since the Lange led government.
It’s all very well trying to run a low profile campaign as Australian Labor did, but what’s the point in being so low profile you can’t be seen?
We can only hope that the combined left win a majority in the election, and that the other parties follow the example set by ACT and New Zealand First in this government, and bludgeon significant policy changes out of Labour.
I’m not optimistic that they will succeed.







Someone said it and I don’t know who.
‘If voting was that important, they wouldn’t let us do it.’
In other words, they already know what they are going to do and having us vote is just a kind gesture to keep as happy and not rioting.
I think there is a plan and I think if we knew what it was, we’d all jump off a cliff.
They don’t want that because an obedient compliant population is necessary for their plan to succeed.
Thank you Allan, for this weighty article on Owen Jones’ book. The saddest thing about it all is that it is a world-wide trend set up for the benefit of the already wealthy. I have never blamed the changes, from how it was when I was young, on migrants and your questions as to who closed the factories, crashed banks and launched the wars are pertinent. Our world is awash with lies, hate, racism, unfairness and greed. As a race we should be ashamed of many of the projects our governments have chosen, to appease countries like the corruptly run USA, Russia etc. What I can see clearly is that there is a plan in NZ at present to keep the ‘workers’ and the ‘needy’ “in their place”, i.e. at the bottom of the heap, always struggling to make ends meet and unable to live a decent, life with equitable wages! Neoliberalism has sure as hell ruined many nations. And all this while there is more than enough to go around; so if everyone thrives our country then thrives. But this doesn’t seem to happen and why – it then becomes about power and control at whatever cost! As far as the wealthy avoiding tax – close ALL the loopholes. If they don’t like it they can move on – they are not paying their fair way now! However wouldn’t it be great if we could all had the chance to be ‘sorted’!
Yes, the wealthy are avoiding taxes, paying low wages, receiving government loans with favorable policies whilst gaining access to our environmental resources, it’s a win win for them
Fantastic stuff @ Allan Alach. Thank you.
More than thirty years ago I watched on in horror as a stunted mustache strutted out like a well healed parasite as Labour’s finance minister to proclaim neoliberalism as being the way of the future I watched further as that future took dark shape as unemployment struct hard. Christchurch, for example, had factories that’d been in business for generations were forced to close with the loss of thousands of jobs as now privatized essential services became unaffordable thus inexcesssable.
We’ve been conned. It’s that simple. As I’ve written tirelessly here for years now. We’ve. Been. Conned . No whoopsie daisy, soz! Seemed like a good idea at the time. None of that. We’ve been conned out of our lives and beautiful life-times by crooks. AO/NZ’s been famously first in many good and fantastic things and innovations so I have an idea. Let’s be another first. The first to fuck neoliberalism and the fuckers who used it to fuck us with? AO-NZ equals
Total Billionaires: 26 individuals or families (up from 18 in 2025)
Collective Wealth: $129 billion across the top wealthy listersTop Placed: Zuru Toys co-founders Nick and Mat Mowbray ($20 billion valuation)
Notable Billionaires & Wealthy Listers
Nick and Mat Mowbray: Zuru Toys co-founders
Graeme Hart: Packaging and investment magnate
Peter Beck: Rocket Lab founder
Sir Rod Drury: Xero founder
One more little thing @ Alan Alach. Our diverse and hugely efficient agricultural primary industry that made us one of the wealthiest first world countries in the world per head of population during the 1970’s… Where is it? Where’d it go? Who crashed it, and why? I think this guy could enlighten us and it’ll only take 30 minutes with Guyon Espiner via Youtube. https://youtu.be/6GNmsgo0u_Q?si=YO3Y5hEEKyzR0dZA
I’ve read Stevenson’s book. Eye opening
Capitalists may be destroying the West but is there any reason in NZ we can’t train our own kids rather than importing,
contract milkers from Chile,
or McDonald’s chefs from India,
or backyard mechanics from Pakistan,
or ED doctors from USA.
There are over 200,000 Kiwis unemployed/underemployed, and that’s after about close to 100,000 have been forced to migrate to Aus.
Why accept loads of unemployment and loads of immigration for the benefit of capitalists?
Yes, your right Joseph and what about all the Indians who will be arriving here shortly due to the new trade agreement. Look I have no objection to immigration, but when it is detrimental to our own, I do. Students allowed to work when we have high NEET rates, yoga teachers, schoolteachers, nurses and chefs for fuck sakes what’s going on.
Owen Jones is fantastic. I’ve appreciated his work for years: he is an articulate, committed voice for the left.
But we also need a more serious and honest reckoning with Marxism-Leninism—including on this site. That means challenging the lies that shape Western accounts of Stalin and Mao, while examining their records critically and acknowledging both achievements.
The question extends beyond what these revolutions accomplished within their own borders. We need to consider how the Soviet Union and the wider communist movement helped shape the international conditions in which welfare states expanded, struggles for racial equality gained ground, and anti-colonial movements challenged European empires.
Those victories belonged to the people who organised and fought for them. But their international context matters. A credible left should be willing to examine the contributions of communist movements to human emancipation with the same seriousness it brings to examining their failures.
Absolutely.
The Westminster System of governance and judiciary has long been in need of an overhaul with a view to replacement.
The ‘powers that be’, so heavily invested in perpetuating their power invested in the System won’t.
Artificial Super Intelligence can and will. For all the fearmongering by the intllegentsia and literati of a mass extinction, come the revolution the ‘powers that be’ and their systems of control will be first against the wall as they are A.I’s biggest threat.