Recently, Australia’s National Terrorism Threat Level was raised, from ‘Possible’ to ‘Probable,’ news that reflects several international trends. Globally, there is increased political division as trust in state institutions decreases and social cohesion drops, resulting in pressure on democratic processes.
Last week, the Director General of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), Mike Burgess commented on a range of issues including the impact of rising tensions in the Middle East, stating that this situation contributed to the new assessment. He also stated that Australia has recently seen an increase in extremist attacks. ASIO’s website states that “ASIO is observing the emergence of domestic actors increasingly driven to action by socio-political issues, intersecting with personal grievances. There is an increase in extremism, fuelled by conspiracy theories and anti-authority ideologies. Some actors hold a blend of ideologies, including those that justify acts of violence to influence change.” The ASIO statement also includes a reminder that the Islamic State and affiliated terror groups are still active stating that “They are almost certainly building on recent successes to plan and conduct further attacks with an intent to target the West, and would consider Australia a legitimate target.”
Essentially, like many nations Australia is experiencing a rise in divisive online rhetoric that is finding fertile ground during a period of economic downturn. A key element of which is persistent online disinformation that undermines the legitimacy of state institutions, resulting in a loss of community trust and confidence. A noteworthy observation by ASIO is that “Attacks in Australia are likely to be low-cost, using readily available weapons, and simple tactics. Basic weapons, such as knives, vehicles, explosives, and firearms can maximise casualties when combined with simple tactics.” Partly, this indicates a change in tactics by organised terror groups that find it easier to organise ‘marauding attacks’ or attacks with improvised weapons, for instance driving a truck into a crowd of people rather than training and equipping armed groups. However, it also recognises the increased threat posed by ‘lone actor’ attacks by individuals radicalised online, carrying out improvised attacks.
The ASIO statement discussed how attacks of this nature are likely to target crowded places in major cities like shopping or transport centres. The most worrying feature of these types of attack is that they are difficult to prevent, and often happen without warning. Australia’s decision is indicative of wider social and security trends that many other Pacific nations are facing.
Chinese Foreign Minister visits war torn Myanmar
Myanmar is currently, fighting a bitter civil war as a range of armed factions unify against the ruling military junta. Myanmar shares a roughly 1,400 km long border with China, that extends through mountainous jungle. This year the junta has suffered several setbacks and the border is very insecure. Recently, insurgent forces captured the important northern town, Lashio. Securing the border area is a very important objective for China, and it maintains relationships with both the ruling junta and several insurgent groups.
This year China has brokered two brief ceasefires, and maintains a close interest in the nation. This week, Chinese Foreign Minister, Wang Yi visited Myanmar. Wang Yi met with Min Aung Hlaing, leader of the military junta and spoke about the need for a peaceful, political resolution to the conflict. Min Aung Hlaing seized power in 2021, over turning a democratically elected government, and China has consistently advised a return to elected government.
Wang Yi also met with retired but very influential General Than Shwe. The general praised China’s support for Myanmar and Wang Yi stated that ” We support Myanmar in safeguarding its independence, sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity, and support Myanmar in its efforts to achieve domestic political reconciliation within the constitutional framework, smoothly hold national elections, and restart the process of democratic transformation.” A statement that captures China’s relationship with Myanmar, supporting a return to democracy but signalling to other nations that any intervention would be opposed by China.
China is concerned about violence interfering with trade and security along the border. However, Myanmar is strategically important for China because it shares a border with its rival, India. Any Indian interest in the nation is a concern for China. Additionally, Myanmar also provides potential access to the Indian Ocean for Chinese trade. Access that may help mitigate US attempts to blockade and isolate China in the Pacific. Therefore, China is likely to retain an interest in the nation as this visit demonstrates. A sudden political change or a Chinese intervention in Burma could have security impacts in the Pacific, so this is a conflict worth monitoring.
New Zealand signals interest in AUKUS
On Thursday, speaking at the Lowry Institute, New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon spoke about the AUKUS partnership and signalled his government’s desire to participate, stating that ”… we welcome AUKUS as an initiative to enhance regional security and stability” and confirming that “New Zealand is exploring with the AUKUS partners how we could potentially participate in pillar two, including to understand what this means for our focus on ensuring interoperability.”
The next day Luxon met with his Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese. At the joint press conference following the meeting the Prime Ministers discussed greater military integration, joint responses to cyberattacks and a variety of other topics, Albanese discussing how Pillar 2 of AUKUS presents opportunities for New Zealand.
Important foreign policy statements because New Zealand is currently debating its position on the AUKUS partnership, specifically whether it asks to join the technology sharing arrangements in ‘Pillar 2.’ This decision is important because of the role New Zealand plays in the South West Pacific. The nation’s history and leadership role mean that its choice is likely to influence other smaller nations. In broad terms, New Zealand’s decision is important because its participation in AUKUS is likely to be interpreted by other smaller Pacific nations as agreeing with US and Australian concerns about China’s potential threat to regional security. An interpretation that may support US and Australian diplomacy that currently seeks to reduce China’s influence in the region.
Recently, two former New Zealand Prime Ministers, Helen Clarke and Don Brash have both spoken out against involvement in AUKUS. Additionally, in early August, the current National party led government, released documents from 2023 detailing the previous Labour government’s discussions about AUKUS. Then on 12 August, Andrew Little a former defence minister, in the previous Labour government, made a public statement countering criticism of New Zealand involvement in AUKUS. Stating that he strongly disagrees with opponents of participation. Little’s statement is interesting and could indicate bi-partisan support for participation. A recognition that New Zealand’s security environment in the Pacific is changing. This week’s events seem to indicate that New Zealand is moving closer to participation in AUKUS.
Kiribati election report
Regular readers will remember that in February, this year, the small Pacific nation of Kiribati’s relationship with China was a cause for US concern. Kiribati sits on the equator approximately 2,000km due south of Hawaii, a strategic location. A modern force based in Kiribati can conduct surveillance of Hawaii or perhaps attack the island with long-range drones, rockets or aircraft. Therefore, the US is highly interested in Kiribati and was concerned about the presence of Chinese police staff on the island.
This week, Kiribati is mid- election and its relationship with China and the US is a political issue. The current President, Taneti Maamau’s tenure has been tense with the nation moving closer to China diplomatically. Some key points of political tension were:
- The nation ceasing to recognise Taiwan in 2019.
- The scrapping of the Phoenix Islands Protected Area in 2021. A UNESCO World Heritage Site planned to become a large marine reserve. Another action that was criticised by opposition politicians who claimed the decision was made to allow for Chinese fishing fleets to harvest the area.
- Kiribati’s withdrawal in 2022 from the Pacific Island Forum for six months, an action that was criticised by opposition politicians who said they feared an isolated nation was more easily influenced by Chinese diplomacy.
This week’s voting will be influenced by Sino-American competition, both nations keen to maintain and develop their relationship with Kiribati. And, the people of Kiribati facing a difficult choice about how they position their nation within that competition.
Melanesian update
A regular update on the Pacific’s least reported trouble spot; Melanesia.
Fiji hosts Indo-Pacific Armies Management Seminar
The Indo-Pacific Armies Management Seminar hosted by Fiji, finished this week. The seminar finished with an address by the U.S. Army Pacific Commander, General Charles Flynn. General Flynn commands US Army Pacific. A significant force, that includes troops in South Korea, Japan, Hawaii and the US. His command includes four divisions of infantry, each with about 10-15,000 soldiers, and a range of logistics and support formations. General Flynn is a ‘heavy hitter’ with a large command, so the fact that he is visiting Fiji and participating in this conference demonstrates US commitment to maintaining Pacific relationships.
General Flynn was clear to reinforce his nation’s key policy positions in the following statement “We can achieve the unity of action because, unlike our adversaries, we share a vision, a common vision, a vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific, a vision in which each country can defend its sovereignty, protect its people, and uphold its own rights under international law.” The conference included representatives from 21 Indo-Pacific nations, providing an opportunity to network and build relationships.
India to build embassy in Timor Leste
Last week’s visit to Timor Leste by India’s president, Droupadi Murmu included an announcement that India intends to establish an embassy in the nation. The visit by President Murmu was an indication of India’s interest, and the embassy announcement provides further evidence of the nation’s longer term diplomatic intent.
Timor Leste is a small and very poor nation, but is strategically located close the mineral wealth of Melanesia and near rising powers Indonesia and Australia. It will be interesting to see how the relationship between Dilli and Delhi develops.
Papua New Guinea Prime Minister avoids ‘No Confidence’ vote
The recent attempt by opposition parties to remove Papua New Guinea’s Prime Minister, James Marape was stopped after the nation’s courts ruled it illegal this week. A narrow escape for the incumbent, and another example of how ‘No Confidence’ motions are used too often in some Pacific nations. Unfortunately, this tactic has become common in the South West Pacific undermining parliamentary process.
Recently, Papua New Guinea has faced natural disasters, tribal war and a massacre. Meanwhile its parliament has spent its last two sessions focussed on debating ‘No Confidence’ motions. Leader of the Opposition, Douglas Tomuriesa has already made clear his intention to propose another ‘No Confidence’ motion when parliament’s next session starts in September.
Ben Morgan is a bored Gen Xer, a former Officer in NZDF and TDBs Military Blogger – his work is on substack
I’ve just come on a post from 2011 by USA watcher Lawrence P. Farrell Jr. on their extreme debt going to defence.
https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2011/11/1/2011november-gentlemen-we-have-run-out-of-money-now-we-have-to-think
…We see massive deficits in national budget projections. We see a Budget Control Act and a Super Committee in the Congress that make only the faintest stab at closing the gap. We see a national debt piling up an additional $15.3 trillion unfunded liability for entitlements between 2012 and 2021. This is 10 times the Super Committee’s debt-reduction target of $1.5 trillion. We see the total deficit during that period of $9.4 trillion, and interest costs in 2021 rising from $168 billion in 2010 to $928 billion in 2021. If projections hold, one can expect a defense budget of $582 billion in 2021. And in 2021, we see discretionary spending at 26 percent of outlays, versus 61 percent for mandatory spending….
It has been said that their debt is largely because entitlements to welfare of the people is too high. But a country that cannot share its income and get enough tax to meet practical needs of modern civilisation cannot afford to essay around the world with expensive deadly petards! (Cf NZ/AO.) There is a simplicity in that statement I admit is childlike much as the child in Hans Christian Andersen’s commenting on the nudity of the Emperor who had been sold a fiction about new and magical clothes.
The tale concerns an emperor who has an obsession with fancy new clothes, and spends lavishly on them, at the expense of state matters. One day, two con-men visit the emperor’s capital. Posing as weavers, they offer to supply him with magnificent clothes that are invisible to those who are incompetent or stupid.
Andersen’s tale is based on a 1335 story from the Libro de los ejemplos (or El Conde Lucanor),[2] a medieval Spanish collection of fifty-one cautionary tales with various sources such as Aesop and other classical writers and Persian folktales, by Juan Manuel, Prince of Villena (1282–1348). Andersen did not know the Spanish original but read the tale in a German translation titled “So ist der Lauf der Welt” (“That’s the way of the world”).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes
If we can fool ourselves as the story sets out to guy, on an observation made in 14th century, how can we cope with AI that aims to show us we all are all fools, a belief that has been woven by sly people amongst us to exploit us? Sharpen up fellow citizens, your nemesis is coming inexorably. We can’t beat it, don’t want to join it, what methods for joy and survival together?
Looking at statements about Lord Rutherford he might give us a lead :
“We’ve got a rabbit here from the Antipodes, and he’s burrowing mighty deeply.”
Andrew Balfour, Advanced Student, Cambridge University. 1904
This was inspired by him. perhaps burrowing is the way!
“He was a man who never did dirty tricks.”
A. S. Russell, 1950.
A. S. Russell stated this during his Rutherford Memorial Lecture, 8 Dec 1950.
“It is now possible by modern methods to produce exceedingly minute quantities of gold, but only by the transmutation of an even more costly element, platinum.”
Ernest Rutherford, 1936.
“If you can’t explain to the charwoman scrubbing your laboratory floor what you are doing, you don’t know what you are doing.”
Lord Ritchie-Calder recollection, 1982.
“I am always a believer in simplicity, being a simple person myself.”
Ernest Rutherford, Goettingen, 14th Dec 1931.
Rutherford was delivering a lecture during the celebrations to mark the bicentennial of the founding of the Royal Society of Gőttingen by the British King George II. During the talk Rutherford stated that he believed the atom had to be a simple thing. The hall, which seated 400 people, was filled 15 minutes before time and some 300 later arrivals were reluctantly turned away. Professor Pohl recorded Rutherford’s talk on his work on nine small acetate discs which were later transcribed onto nine 74rpm records. (See Rutherford Artifacts in Miscellaneous.)
“It is now possible by modern methods to produce exceedingly minute quantities of gold, but only by the transmutation of an even more costly element, platinum.”
Ernest Rutherford, 1936.
https://www.rutherford.org.nz/msquotes.htm
I suggest taking time to read through these statements before making any decisions involving lots of money, big contracts, or lots of deaths and injuries to anyone. A refreshing cooling to the heated brain.
Nice observations Grey, there is a lot of cognitive dissonance based upon what is good for the pocket.
Many times I have walked through the tunnels and forts on North Head Auckland, Mirimar Wellington and Ripapa in Lyttelton. Apparently the Russians were coming in the late Victorian era. Papers sold, editors whipped up patriotic frenzy, contractors and armament makers made lots of cash. The Russians of course couldn’t even identify NZ on a map, and had no reason to come. Ben continues this great tradition of telling fairytales for the money men.
Maybe if Australia doesn’t want counter-terrorism to happen against it, it should simply stop being involved in terrorism worldwide- from the bombing of Yemeni civilians, to the American race war against Chinese people?
That’s a good thought MK – try passing that on to the Aussies as is and see if it can get past the portcullis in their minds.
Australia’s rising terrorism threat level reflects growing global instability, with increased extremism fueled by divisive online rhetoric and socio-political tensions, posing new security challenges.