The Liberal Agenda: Ricky Gervais & the glory of heteronormative white cis male privilege

66
1487

Ricky Gervais slammed for ‘bigot comedy’ about trans people in new Netflix special

Ricky Gervais is under fire for his new Netflix standup special, SuperNature.

The star has landed in hot water after his hour-long special included jokes about the trans community and “old-fashioned women”.

Near the beginning of the show the actor says, “Oh, women! Not all women, I mean the old-fashioned ones. The old-fashioned women — you know, the ones with wombs. Those fucking dinosaurs.”

People Magazine reported the comedian continued on to say, “I love the new women. They’re great, aren’t they? The new ones we’ve been seeing lately,”

Adding, “The ones with beards and cocks. They’re as good as gold, I love them. And now the old-fashioned ones [say], ‘Oh, they want to use our toilets.’ ‘Why shouldn’t they use your toilets?’ ‘For ladies!’ ‘They are ladies — look at their pronouns! What about this person isn’t a lady?’ “

“Well, his penis.’ ‘Her penis, you fucking bigot!’

Her. Penis. You. Fucking. Bigot!

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

I laughed so hard at that joke I almost knocked my laptop off the table.

Ricky’s latest hilarious stand up offering on Netflix is as controversial as all good comedy should be.  Gervais like Chappelle have been cancelled by puritan woke censors who claim their jokes against the Trans community amount to a hate crime.

This attempt to discredit the intellectual power and social commentary gold that both comedians present is driven by a belief that good satire should ‘never punch down’, but the problem with that argument is that the puritan woke censors  and their identity politics dogma IS the dominant cultural now, so critiquing the middle class woke’s virtue signalling is EXACTLY the job of comedy.

The joke…

They are ladies — look at their pronouns! What about this person isn’t a lady?’ “

“Well, his penis.’ ‘Her penis, you fucking bigot!’

…perfectly sums up the crazy militancy and intellectual brittleness of the Woke’s demands over Trans ideology that has plagued that debate to the point where people don’t want anything to do with the toxicity and cancellation malice of the woke.

It’s like that scene in 1984 when O’Brien is torturing Winston by holding up his hand and demanding ‘How many fingers am I holding up’. O’Brien is holding up 4 fingers but telling Winston it’s 5 fingers and he keeps torturing Winston until he sees 5 fingers.

That what the woke are attempting over Trans ideology, by demanding on threat of cancellation and social banishment that we see what they see. Anyone who claims to see 4 fingers when the woke are telling us there are 5 fingers must be burnt at the stake as a heretic for crimes against woke dogma.

For comedians to mock that power and laugh at it is the most important thing comedians can do right now and that’s why the woke hate comedians so much.

At one point Ricky hilariously uses intersectionality to point out that as a heteronormative white cis male millionaire, he is a minority so he can say what he likes.

This is Gervais at his funniest and most important.

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

66 COMMENTS

      • 1. Not all woke people … hate comedians

        The site has a deserved reputation for inciting hate the woke prejudice.

        2. The woke who marry comedians are as rare as a woman who have a penis.

        Counter observation is an important part of free speech.

        3. Some people only like humour, if they approve.

        • show me a funny rightwing comedian and I’ll laugh…
          offer doesn’t include dimbo rightard pollies or blowhard grifters…nor isolated quotes from lefties like george carlin lifted out of context.

  1. 100% Martyn.
    I haven’t laughed so much in years.

    These Woke types are just playground bullies. All it takes is a bit of ridicule to destroy their influence.

      • Unfortunately there’s another pathway that gets followed all too often, first they laugh at you, then they abuse you, next they attack you & finally they murder you. With Trans people that often the way things go.

  2. The tide is finally turning. DeSantis stood up and then fucked Disney over and ever since the woke have been on the back foot. As the world heads into recession unpopular woke shite will struggle as people vote with their feet. The dual threat of government action and financial oblivion is finally dawning on the woke elite. The sheeple have had enough.

    • DeSantis is an evangalical bigot who would criminalise being LGBT if he had his way. He sees homosexuals the same way as the Nazis saw the jews. Vermin and degenerates fit only for extermination.

  3. Bill Mayer in the same ‘cancel him’ stoush with trans activists too I see.
    If the activists can actually point out what Bill Meyer said is factually incorrect then they have a point….but they can’t.
    Haven’t seen Gervais’s new stand up yet but he will be bloody funny and correct in his observations no doubt.

    As usual, the woke left have no sense of humour.

    • Not all of those people.

      It’s interesting how a coalition has formed against “social” progressives.

      At one level its a latter day McCarthyism to protect the status quo.

      • @SPC I take your point about ‘not all woke people’ however the reaction to the excesses of Woke preaching and impulses towards authoritarianism is completely predictable.

        There is a religiosity towards seeing society through a cultural conflict-theory lens of oppressor/oppressed (evil/good) based on identity markers.
        This is no accident, most self-identified ‘Woke’ people do not understand the history of Woke ideology (‘street’ or applied Critical Theory) or it’s marriage of convenience with fashionable neoliberals. It is seen as a continuation of earlier decades of progressive activism when infact it is often the antithesis. Woke is a cuckoo in the progressive nest, it leverages off the plight of a selective groups in society for the benefit of a cultural elite while largely ignoring socio-economics and is often counterproductive for those it claims to support. It’s main benefit seems to be in making affluent middle class people feel better about themselves and enriching a handful of identity-preachers.

        Essentialising around identity markers is not progressive it is highly regressive and divisive. Unfortunately in the same way that most Woke people cannot see Woke is a cuckoo in the progressive nest, neither can many others. The growing backlash will be accelerated by hard economic times and just when we need universalist, progressive economic policies the most, the danger is we kick out the cuckoo AND burn the nest making progressive policies impossible for a decade or more.

  4. I like tricky Ricky.

    And I enjoyed reading the trans community meltdown over his jokes. Those people are their own worst enemy

  5. and yet he did nothing more then throw their own words back at them.
    People who got raped by a Transwoman in the UK are indeed froced to call their rapist a ‘she’ as in ‘she raped me with her penis’.
    And yes, it is laughable, but not for the women who are then incarcerated, raped, assaulted, and inseminated by these same ‘women with penises’ in female prisons.
    Soon to come here, i am sure the purple clad genderbread fairy from the Greens will make sure of it.
    Funnily enough it is exactly this movement that will force dear Chloe to become a ‘non gendered’ person. As a white, middleclass, cis ‘karen’ err female, she stands no chance to having a career in the Greens beyond what she got now.
    But yeah, men having a good laugh at the expense of women – the real ones, not the fake ones with penises, its as old as is time.

  6. Not a joke, a tweet, in which a rape apologist told a women that they were raped by “women with a penis”. Glad you think its funny though. Wait until these women with penises complain about heteromen not fucking them.

  7. I still reckon Ricky MC efforts at the Hollywood awards ceremony was a Masterclass in demonstrating Hollywood’s flaws.

  8. At one point Charles Koch uses intersectionality to point out that as a heteronormative white cis male billionaire, he is a minority so he can say and do and fund whatever/whoever he likes.

    • @SPC It would be interesting if that causes dissonance in woke activists as that’s not how intersectionality works, it is not defined by ‘minority’ status but by ‘oppression’ status.

      It uses a cultural version of conflict theory where the dichotomy of oppressor/oppressed is applied to identity categories. So white/Black, straight/gay, male/female, cis/trans, colonial/indigenous, it goes on and on, to obesity, neuro-divergence etc. No doubt right-handedness will be problematised at some point.

      These categories or dimensions ‘intersect’ and the victimhood adds up and the privilege subtracts. This determines status of privilege/victimhood. For the more extreme ideologues it even signals morality of evil/good, privilege becomes analogous to original sin.

      Heteronormative, white, cis and male scores privilege points (‘bad’) in each category. Billionaire would be glossed over as this brand of neo-marxists usually ignore any effective socio-economic critique.

  9. Ricky G absolutely nails it! He merely reflects back the trans activists lines and they do their usual baby cries of outrage. “Her penis you fucking bigot”. Gold. Captures the gas lighting that is part of this movement

  10. What is with the anti-trans hate on here. We all know that Ricky’s chain is being pulled by the Christian right here.

    • It’s not hate Millsy, it’s laughing at how absurd it’s all become and knowing the left woke will be on a hiding to nothing trying to cancel Gervaise as he is too popular worldwide.
      Perhaps you can go to The Standard and sink into the 40th or so Weka post about transexuals…no laughing allowed over on her posts….you will fit right in!

    • “anti-trans hate”
      You need to get out more millsy, never mind that laughing at someone (actually an idea in this case) is not hate, it’s not even trans that are being laughed at. It’s the Emperor’s New Clothes level bullshit.
      Remember jokes millsy?

    • I am trying to be polite here Millay, because I believe you are well intentioned.

      The idea of people having a gender identity was first posited by a sexologist, Dr John Money. Money made statements that children could consent to having sex with adults and that under these circumstances paedophilia is ok. He is still quoted on a paedophilia activist website. There is a cleat overlap between gender identity and queer theory. The academics credited with developing queer theory include Judith Butler, who believes biological sex is a social construction and that children can consent to sex with adults. As did Michael Foulcout. Prof Gabrielle Rubin also advocated for inter generational sex. These three are identified as developing this ideology. These academics were not clinicians (other than Money), but have exposed theories that trans right activists have adopted and parroted. And it is these activists who shut women in particular down, when they challenge these theories. Thus Ricky parodies this beautifully when he says “but he’s got a penis”. Response back “she’s got a penis, you fucking bigot”. This is what happens to women when they point out the reality that men cannot become woman(and instantly be accepted into our sex class).

      Meanwhile excellent research out of Sweden of long term follow up of trans people who under go sex reassignment surgery. At long term follow up, they had higher rates of suicide, heart disease, psychiatric admissions than prior to sex re assignment. Men who transitioned to women had the same rates of criminality as natal males. Females, in one part of the study had criminality rates that resembled natal males. So we need good science to direct us to the best treatments for people with gender dysphoria. And I am not going to begin to talk about children being given puberty blockers and being given double mastectomies aged 16.

      • Smearing the LGBT community as peadophiles is an age old trope by those in the the religious right (Anita Bryant, Phylis Schafly, etc) to impose their own biblical puritan world view.

        Tell me, do you want LGBT’s made illegal. Seems like you do.

        • No I don’t want LBGTQ made illegal. Especially as one of the dearest people in my life is in that cmty (by the way, they agree with my views). I am not sure what gave you that idea

          I am not smearing the cmty, just bringing to light the origins of the theories that trans activists try to impose on others who disagree.

            • Those three that you refer to think that LGBT should be driven out of public view, back in the home, and back in the closet. Shirer is opposed to people being transgender, fullstop, and thinks that gay and trans students and teachers shoud be forced out of the school system.

              They all want to impose a puritan biblical theocracy where all pleasure and moral vices are banned and we should just read the Bible.

              • You clearly have no idea who Buck Angel or Rose of Dawn are (clue: they are Trans). Buck has been advocating for trans rights longer that any Queer Theory inspired useful idiot like you.

                MILLSY SCRIPT
                [Thing I disagree agree with or strawman] means you [want or hold] a [despicable act or belief]

                “LGBT should be driven out of public view, back in the home”
                Well I do like it when my partner is home early especially on date nights. Oh yes Millsy, don’t be a dick

        • it wasn’t the LGBT community that were smeared as paedos but specifically gay men and it was often radical lesbian sepratists doing the smearing…see chch creche case.

        • @Milsy when you want to put someone like @Anker on the back foot why not try to vary your ad hominem’s? You’re way too predictable.
          [Thing I disagree agree with] means you [want or hold] a [despicable act or belief]

          Of course you could try to form a coherent argument, the fact you cannot clearly shows you want to bring back slavery.

          This is not trans hate, this is a dislike of trans ideology, not the same thing (btw my partner is trans so no need to get offended on their behalf).

          In the meantime I’ll be less polite that Anker – don’t be a dick.

          • The ‘trans ideology’ is simply transgender people wanting to live their lives and be themselves without judgement and discrimination, and be treated with dignity and respect. And yes, that means that people need to sit under the clothesline and have a good think about what pronouns they use to address trans people.

            I really am at a loss as to why you have a huge issue of that. Unless you are one of those people who think that you have a first name relationship with a Palestinian carpenter who died 2000 years ago and his toga wearing space alien father (now that is what I describe as mentally ill), and he told you that being trans is a sin and those who are deserve eternal suffering.

            • LOL Milsy you’re hilarious, but fair is fair I will amend Milsy script
              [Thing I disagree agree with OR STRAWMAN ARGUEMENT] means you [want or hold] a [despicable act or belief]

              “people need to sit under the clothesline and have a good think about what pronouns they use to address trans people.”
              That’s not the argument numbnuts. People like you that are making life harder for people like my partner and other trans people who just want to live their lives and not be part of the laughable regressive activism you seem so enamoured with.

            • millsey if people tell me their pronouns happy to try to oblige (factoring in the odd slip up)

              BUT I’m not fuckin psychic so unless strangers wear a t-shirt or get tats on their forehead how am I to know?? judge by appearance? surely that’s some ‘phobic/ism’ or another…

      • The claim that predatory behaviour would result from progressive reform was a tactic used to suppress acceptance of same sex relationships. Neither children, nor animals, are more at risk from same sex marriages.

        • SPC, I agree with you that neither children or animals are at risk from same sex marriages.

          However Queer theory is problemation for reasons I have mentioned above, mainly that it’s proponents endorse “consensual” sex between adults and children, or inter generational sex.

          • @Anker this is compounded by creating a protected class that is in someway sanctified or beyond reproach. Even when done with the best of intensions, people seeking social advantage or to act with malicious or abusive intent will seek to identify within that class for the cover it provides (Catholic Priest is a classic example). This is why IMO self-identification, while it sounds great in theory, has the potential for misuse and risks backfiring spectacularly for BOTH women and trans women.

      • Religious right are laundering their talking points through the secular IDW. These days, prominent atheists are basically echoing the words of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell.

      • indeed nitrium, I think the real offence that ricky represents is being a smart working class kid…the ‘footlights/edinburgh festival’ comedy gang hate him for that ‘how dare an oik be smarter and funnier than the oxbridge drones’

    • Millsy
      You ask: What is with the anti-trans hate on here? Well this is tricky. I think as with all these…unusual ‘out of the norm’ situations, what people don’t like is not the fact that someone wants to be male or female or both or what ever. I don’t think that’s it, everyone is free to be. But it could be because the whole thing gets pushed so hard onto society at large, especially by a vocal group of ‘newsmakers’ (social media) – in an almost forceful way. Suddenly, instantly, it’s all about them, they are more important than anyone else! Pavements get painted rainbow, advertisers do ‘unrealistic situation’ woke ads on tv, politicians join the show and push for laws to be changed, school toilets are rearranged, and suddenly everything is about them. You make a joke about it and you gets cancelled or arrested. Maybe, it’s just too much for society to digest sometimes?? And that’s why Ricky G is like a relief valve – he dares to say stuff, let alone joke about it. Because he couldn’t give fuck what people think of him! Did anyone ask all these LGBTQ folks if they want that much ‘fuss’ made about them? Or is that just a bunch of ‘woke’ people’s reaction for wanting to be seen to be doing the ‘right thing’…because it makes them feel better and popular? I have a gay mate, great guy, he absolutely hates the fact that so much fuss is made about all that stuff…

      • @Just Kraut “Did anyone ask all these LGBTQ folks if they want that much ‘fuss’ made about them?”

        I cannot speak for everyone because surprisingly for some woke people LGBT people are not a monolith, who could have imagined?

        I’m a B dating a T (statement of identity cringe), and like your mate, some (perhaps most?) dislike and increasingly despise being used in woke ideological games and find this ‘offence-on-behalf-of’ incredibly patronising. It’s also laughable that wokism is seen as a continuation of earlier progressive politics.
        For me the aim was respect, acceptance and equality NOT equity, sanctification or some fashionable “aesthetic of queerness”.

        A big concern now is the longer this woke BS goes on, the bigger the backlash. I feel less confident about the future now than 5 or even 10 years ago. This is NOT due to the spectre of right-wing nutcases or cultural conservatives. It’s that wokists screw up basic governance and piss sufficient ordinary people off and the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater.

  11. Comedians – social warriors!
    I’m thinking of Eddie Izzard in his male trans-dressing period and one skit he did about invading powers thinking Britain. Having a go at something that obviously was ripe to be mocked. Hilarious. He decided on his own that he wanted to be female but I think he has considered it carefully, as did Jan Morris. But I don’t expect every gormless dimwit to take advantage of females and decide to join the sisterhood and so divide it.
    This is Eddie having a go at colonialists:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTduy7Qkvk8

    • the thing is eddie is intelligent most woke literally cannot sustain their positions in debate so throw a hissy fit.

      the problem with policing every single micro aggression is that if/when a real actual threat comes along people will go ‘oh fuck not them whining again’ and a serious situation will go unaddressed…I suppose ‘boy who cried wolf’ in a nutshell.

      • @Gagarin for me Eddy is not ideologically ‘woke’. AFAIK he is just advocating for expanding societies acceptance and respect for trans, an old school progressive rather than the contemporary Critical Theory inspired ideologues and zealots.

        The Boy who cried Wolf and the Emperor’s New Clothes are fitting parables for the excesses of this cultural moment. Ricky, Dave and Bill are like the boy who calls the Emperor naked, more and more people are laughing.

        This is a good thing for now, alas the pendulum will eventually swing too far the the other way. In twenty years genuine comedians will be back to taking the piss out of conservative religious puritans.

        • indeed tui didn’t suggest he was, just that whatever he calls himself he’s still smart and funny…his ‘action tranvestite’ phase was groundbreaking at the time and the fact he wanted to join the SAS and has done marathons shuts up the obese rightist beer swillers of the ‘The 3rd chairbound infantry’ on the ‘sissy issue’…

          it maybe a good thing if rightists check out gervais other work on the back of this fake ‘transphobia’ issue they might get educated on evolution, god, and gun control…..he’s just ‘ignorancephobic’

          and at the end of the day he explains the concept of ‘irony’ at the opening of the special anyone who carries on viewing in the expectation of ‘woke comedy’ has been warned…so have no legitimate grounds for whining

          • @Gagarin, sorry I misread and yes Eddie is the ultimate ‘action tranvestite’! Ricky being ‘ignorancephobic’ is a good way of putting it, he ridicules BS without favour.

  12. It seems to me that schizophrenics should be allowed to use plural pronouns all the time. As Alf Garnet would have said, “Stands to reason, dunnit?” That would really add to the ridiculous mix.
    I do not believe that any of this pronoun nonsense will ever become accepted by the population at large.
    I remember when the word ‘gay’ was taken over by homosexuals (and for dumbies, that includes lesbians) to give a new, uplifting aspect, implying happiness and acceptability, to their standing.
    Sadly, as a result of this idea, ‘gay’ has become a nasty pejorative for young people now. To them it means ‘queer, weird, unnatural, unwanted.’
    Just what those who adopted the word were trying to obliterate.
    Not so easy to manipulate language use…

  13. Funny. A man making jokes about other men is offensive??

    How about the Mellinial generation go and get a refund from their educational institution that fucked their widdle heads up with this Wokery Voodoo fuckwittedness.

  14. the problem with adopting ‘good words’ is that they soon lose their shine…how long did it take for ‘special’ to become ‘thpeshul’ it’s the intellectual delusion that changing ‘words’ changes ‘the nature of the thing’ it doesn’t but it’s easier than addressing actual issues.

    • @gagrin back to your point about Crying Wolf, this is also true for “bad words”. Racist, sexist, misogynist, nazi, even white supremacist, used to have very powerful meanings and now they are thrown around like confetti to the point that they have diminished weight. How long till it’s less likely to suggest a despicable person and, like an online ‘ad Hitlerum’, more likely to suggest intellectual vacuity on the part of the user. Perhaps we are already there?

      Woke ideology pushing the horseshoe theory of politics, conjuring and enabling that which it purports to resist.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.