Stuart Smith doing what National Party MPs do best, spread lies about climate change…
National Party MP Stuart Smith has described a Government climate change plan as the “science of bull****” during a talk in Ashburton this week.
The Kaikōura MP floated suggestions that warmer temperatures would not cause an increase in extreme rains – contrary to the Government’s National Climate Change Risk Assessment (NCCRA) plan.
…it shouldn’t surprise anyone that the Party who drove a tractor up the stairs of Parliament because they didn’t believe in global warming is back to its old games of minimizing global warming and claiming we can’t do anything.
Let’s remember, Judith is in bed with the deniers.
Judith published an opinion piece on the fossil fuel paywall gated community that is ‘Carbon news‘ in 2019 which argues against zero carbon, the Paris agreement and downplays the magnitude of what we are facing.
She was doing the classic ‘question the science’ tactic, which the tobacco industry used to argue there was no clear connection between cancer and smoking. She was also signalling to the deep pockets of the pollution industry that if she was leader they would have a much more benign environment to operate in.
Judith is directly leading the climate denier electorate who refuse to point blank accept any of the science. Here is what science blog has had to say about Judith’s absurd claims…
The Zero Carbon Bill implements this agreement for New Zealand. It implements what the National-led government agreed to when they signed the Paris Agreement, which Judith Collins now states “is not justified by any scientific findings” – this after innumerable scientists and delegates, including those of the New Zealand government, pored over and agreed to every word. Since the Agreement was signed, the IPCC 1.5ºC report – “1.5 to Stay Alive” – has strengthened the case for 1.5ºC. There is a broad consensus, both in New Zealand and internationally, about what needs to be done. Contrary to what Collins claims, the NZ emission target does not have “almost zero chance of being achieved”; it is entirely feasible and will lead to health and economic benefits for all New Zealanders.
As for “there is no indication they [the costs of global warming] are insurmountable”, it partly depends on what value you place on mass extinction and the loss of treasures like the Great Barrier Reef, not to mention coastal cities. How can this be surmounted?
The existential risks are real if difficult to size up. Hans Schellnhuber, founder of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and climate advisor to the EU, Angela Merkel, and the Pope, said in 2018, “I think there is a very very big risk that we will just end our civilisation. The human species will survive somehow, but we will destroy almost everything we have built up over the last two thousand years. I think we have more than a five percent chance of [preventing this]. But it’s definitely less than 50% in my view.”
…with Labour we are trying to get Jacinda to live up to her rhetoric on combating global warming, with National we are still trying to get them to admit there it’s even happening.
That’s why we can never let National near power again.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media