The Council of Trade Unions is the latest of a wide-range of organisations to join the call for Work and Income NZ’s relationship rules to be changed.
“While we acknowledge and appreciate what the government is doing with wage subsidy to help people stay connected with their workplaces, we hope they will extend their support for those who have lost their jobs,” says CTU Economist Andrea Black.
“Since the 90s the low wage economy, coupled with rising housing and food costs, has meant most households need two incomes to make ends meet.”
“The tax system treats everyone as an individual but the welfare system doesn’t. This is causing increased hardship for people who lose their jobs and are finding that because they are in a relationship, they are locked out of accessing welfare support,” continues Black.
The definition of a relationship on Work and Income NZ’s website is very vague and can vary from living together, to having a sexual relationship, whether others perceive them as a couple, or giving each other emotional support or companionship.
“WINZ’s relationship rules are especially tough on low and middle income families where two incomes are needed to prevent hardship,” says Black.
“One partner in full time work earning the minimum wage is enough to prevent the other partner from getting any amount of Jobseeker Support.”
“With more and more people becoming unemployed due to Covid-19 it has never been more urgent the government decides to change MSD’s outdated and discriminatory relationship rules,” stated Black.
“The way to safeguard our country through Covid-19 is to ensure that everyone has the income they need to get through this.”
“That means individualising benefits and continuing to increase benefit rates beyond the $25 they have already done, to realistic, liveable levels. As was recommended in the Welfare Expert Advisory Group report” continued Black.
Last November, an open letter calling for benefits payments to be individualised and for an end to relationship based welfare fraud investigations was co-signed by ActionStation, Auckland Action Against Poverty, Child Poverty Action Group, Disabled Persons Assembly NZ, Auckland Women’s Centre, Wellington Sexual Abuse Help, The Aunties, The National Network of Family Violence Services, CCS Disability Action, FinCap and the The Mental Health Foundation of NZ.
The open letter stated:
“The government should instead be seeking to support strong connections between people and build strong, resilient communities. The solution is for people in government to change how relationships are treated by Work and Income New Zealand so people get what they need to live a dignified life that does not trap them in poverty and make them fearful to build relationships.”
Sole parent and recipient of the Supported Living Payment, the benefit for people with chronic long-term illnesses or disability, Hannah McGowan says life was hard before Covid-19 but now survival is almost impossible:
“We were asked to stock up on supplies for a period of self-isolation, when many of us struggle to live week to week. I am considered a ‘high-risk’ to complications and death from COVID-19 due to the immune-suppressing medication I have to take. My need for new, essential items such as antibacterial wipes, hand sanitiser, extra soap, and cleaning supplies has decimated my impossibly low income,” says McGowan.
“Everything I buy must be sanitized or isolated. It is exhausting, costly, and stressful. People like myself need to buy ahead to stay safe, but the extra costs have meant I have maxed out my credit card already,” continued McGowan.
“When PM Jacinda Arden announced Level 4 she said that even in this strict self-isolation period, people can have one designated person to help them out if they are alone. But under the current WINZ rules, if I get emotional or financial support from anyone, I could end up being investigated for being in a relationship. It is time this punitive and cruel policy was abolished permanently,” states McGowan.
Let our people go! Loosen your moralistic, mind-bending, autocratic and class-ridden attitudes about human relationships you Government and deemed government rulers. Trump says he can do anything he wants, though he can’t according to the rules governing his Office.
But you and your attitudes of mixed despising, patronising and condemning can apparently make your own rules that oppress the people of our intelligent democracy as much as any theocracy can. You can prevent people having happiness and stability and providing those basic conditions for their children.
Social policy knows that there is a cycle of behaviour and attitude that affects children, even before they are born. You in the ‘caring professions’ have made that an oxymoron, or something similarly negative. And people need sufficient money to live on and the return of grants that are not loans, which is a despicable and hateful burden placed on beneficiaries. Your whole crooked system is like something that happened in Dickens’ day and you are facsimilies of the loathsome characters that he portrayed, applying charity with a self-righteous whip or to the meanest level to the recipents, and the most profitable to those in charge.
From the post: The definition of a relationship on Work and Income NZ’s website is very vague and can vary from living together, to having a sexual relationship, whether others perceive them as a couple, or giving each other emotional support or companionship.
You who have instigated the above system are loveless and cruel, and those who work within it become callous and brutalised by administering it. Change now, we should not have to say please. Do your job professionally, not as a bunch of fault-finding, punitive persecutors. It reminds me of Maori children in earlier colonial times, being bashed over the hands for speaking Maori in class – just plain dogmatic, punitive and nasty that was.
….” You who have instigated the above system are loveless and cruel, and those who work within it become callous and brutalised by administering it. Change now, we should not have to say please. Do your job professionally, not as a bunch of fault-finding, punitive persecutors. It reminds me of Maori children in earlier colonial times, being bashed over the hands for speaking Maori in class – just plain dogmatic, punitive and nasty that was”…
———————-
Excellent post concerning an excellent article.
However , I would not have been quite so tactful and polite. These people in positions of influence know nothing but force, – else they would not have encouraged a culture of force.
And the only reason those types of people were allowed into those positions of influence was because the cost of living had far exceeded the bullshit welfare allowance to the point of deprivation , – not withstanding the DELIBERATE hoops and hurdles and gobbledygook mountains of paperwork required. Thus they needed a Harold Titter personality to fill the ranks and be the concentration camp Oberführer.
Someone devoid of empathy, pity , forward social vision and someone who only cares about fulfilling quotas set by their direct superiors to retain their fat greedy politically aligned arses in a job. A yes person.
But now , – now , – this is an ENTIRELY different situation that is exposing the neo liberal lie that ‘there isn’t enough money ‘… to rather one of, …
….” Where the FUCK has all the money gone and WHY aren’t those rich bloody corporate’s paying their damn fair share in tax and and WHY do we pay so much for products from former Utility’s like power and WHO is taking all the money out of this country?, And WHY do the Aussie banks keep announcing record profits and taking 5.8 billion dollars out of this country every year???”….
I think if the spotlight was redirected from the diversion of those unemployed to the REAl arseholes that have bleeding this country dry for the last 3 decades … then we would have less myopia and far more clear sightedness as to WHY we seem to be so focused on our navels and looking round for the easiest scapegots instead of collaring the REAL culprits.
Yup! A bit like the bullshit that the PM is coughing up 20% of her income!
The PM’s real salary …20% is calculated by separating each salary per role whereas Beneficiaries are treated differently and their income is calculated as a gross sum before tax deductions.
PM’s Salary $471k(1)+$296k(2)+($288,900×3(3,4,5) = $1,637,000.00 x 20% = $326,140.00
DPMC’s $231.6k short.
1.Salary as PM.
2.PMC Cabinet Minister
3.Minister Security & Intelligence
4. Minister Art Culture & Heritage
5. Minister of Keeping Kids in Poverty
Comments are closed.