Another obscene mass shooting in America…

6
587

Another obscene mass shooting in America, another white supremacist male with a homicidal inferiority complex & another round of hand wringing about gun control.

Thoughts and prayers are hollow and evil as a response to this cultural sickness.

There is no easy solution to the horror of white toxic masculinity other than the wisdom of Frederick Douglass…

…as the Gun nuts of NZ cry out at the injustice of them not being able to own machine guns, let us not water down our grim determination to avoid being in the following list ever again…

6 COMMENTS

    • You’re full of it Horrorday, your examples are rubbish. The epidemic is an urban legend, you gullible bruh!

  1. Surely time to start tracking the movements of five-eye citizens around the world, seems that this psycho cohort perpetuates the most harm (white people mostly ay, with their little guns?). If it’s not Canadian teen murderers playing soldiers in the woods, it’s American infants in their parents’ basement being radicalised via those ridiculous online forums, or Australian military fantasists so tiny and weak they have to use a gun penis extension to impress their make believe online community. Maybe NZ should build our own wall, an immigration barrier to alert us when white Americans have arrived, and track them using ankle bracelets.

  2. This law in NZ is not to protect the People,it is to protect the State.

    A glance at the Police website shows that it is not Automatic machine guns but rather semi automatic hunting/farming/civil defence variety guns that have come under prohibition.

    These are the types of tools which are used by the vast majority of law abiding citizens in our country.

    Prohibited Accessories include items designed or intended for MilitaryStyleSemiAutomatic Weapons,such as stocks,sights and silencers.
    But many of the above items are generic to both the Civilian Version of the gun and its Military Grade Version.

    The AR15 used at Christchurch is actually the semi automatic,Civilian version of its brother,the unreliable American Army standard issue M16 Automatic Assault Rifle,which failed so often in Vietnam.

    It is also the case that many manufacturers stocks,sights and silencers are designed to fit on universal mounting systems,meaning that a telescopic sight designed for a .177 calibre air rifle will in many cases mount directly to a number of prohibited guns.

    The same is true of laser sights,range finders,night vision and camera attachments.
    The Police website says the prohibition includes the things i mentioned,but is not limited to them.

    So the Police can now charge many innocent people with breaching this prohibition,simply for having a telescopic laser sight and a night vision camera on a slug gun,because these accessories were also designed for and directly mount to a number of popular models of semi and fully automatic machine guns.

    I think you will find with hindsight that this prohibition does little to limit crime in the community and in fact increases crime by criminalising more people on trivial/dubious grounds.

    Given that the State at this point must be regarded as an Enemy of the People,and it would not be prohibiting firearms to help us,the most reasonable explanation for this prohibition is a draconian disarming of the general population.

    I don’t accept it is purely in response to the incident in Christchurch,we can see that there has for years been an agenda by the State to disarm the civilian population for reasons that will soon become painfully clear to all.

    Why would the State feel a need to disarm the entire population?

    What has the coalition been asked to do by the global ruling Elite?

    • This law in NZ is not to protect the People,it is to protect the State.

      How does it protect the state?

      A glance at the Police website shows that it is not Automatic machine guns but rather semi automatic hunting/farming/civil defence variety guns that have come under prohibition.

      What one earth is a civil defence variety of gun?

      These are the types of tools which are used by the vast majority of law abiding citizens in our country.

      The vast majority of kiwis do not own a gun, law abiding or otherwise.

      Why would the State feel a need to disarm the entire population?

      If the entire population were armed, or even a significant percentage were, you might have a point, but they aren’t, so you don’t.

Comments are closed.