High Court: Sellman v Slater Interlocutory declarations

4
10

Interlocutory declarations are determined in a defamation suit by three medical professional plaintiffs:
(a) Mr Cameron Slater’s application to exclude evidence is declined;
(b) a version of the plaintiffs’ application for particular discovery by Mr Slater and Mr Graham is granted;
(c) the plaintiffs’ application for particular discovery by Mrs Katherine Rich and the New Zealand Food and Grocery Council is granted only to a limited extent;
(d) Mrs Rich’s and the NZFGC’s application for particular discovery by the plaintiffs is declined;
(e) the plaintiffs’ application to examine Mr Slater and Mr Graham orally is granted because they have made insufficient answer to interrogatories.

4 COMMENTS

    • Its a hunting/fishing exercise it they don’t have enough evidence that Slater is a nutcase.

      Waste of time and money really!!

      We already know he has been demonstrating clearly that he is a nutcase already.

Comments are closed.