Simon Bridges & Judith Collins response to the meth hysteria their Party fed should rule them out of Government forever

10
11

I just fucking don’t even know what to say about this…

…let me get this completely straight.

After gleefully selling the myth that dirty filthy bludgers were smoking P and contaminating state houses…

…after being officially informed in 2016 that they were misusing Housing NZs meth standards, after needlessly spending $120million on decontamination that we never should have paid, after throwing 2400 of the most vulnerable onto the streets, after demonising state tenants so the Government could push through a state house privatisation agenda, the Leader of the Party who did all this is now describing those beneficiaries who were spitefully treated as ‘Meth Crooks’???

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

In many of theses cases there was no baseline test, meaning no one knew when the meth smoking had occurred, yet the positive test would see the current residents thrown out.  In other cases, it was a family member, so 89 year old Rosemary Rudolph had to be thrown onto the street.

The pure cruelty necessary to attack those who have been harmed and unjustifiably treated by the state  as ‘meth crooks’ is so ugly and so spiteful it makes me vomit.

How dare National Party MPs attack the 2400 they made homeless and how dare National pretend the $120million we needlessly spent was some how justified.

Simon Bridges & Judith Collins have managed to make Trump’s victim blaming look like valid criticism.

 

10 COMMENTS

  1. Just being part of the Inter-National party should rule them out of being in the government.
    And shouldn’t the people who spent lots of money cleaning up their falsely contaminated houses be upset with Inter-National for pushing a clearly false policy, and by doing so directly funded one of their mates businesses?

    • You miss the point. The government guide lines for clean up required the use of two powerful chemicals. Sodium carbonate and sodium hypochlorite. This must have been serious shit to employ Janola and sugar soap to clean up.

  2. “Should”… the Natzis and their foreign spy will glide into power in 2020 on the back of their (ever increasing) support from foreign voters

  3. So inviting somebody over to smoke meth at your place (yes you live in a state house, so it’s all good, the landlord won’t complain) is no problem. No matter what your story, no matter what your excuse, meth is an illegal drug and u are condoning it in your home. If u get evicted it’s your problem.

    Those who were evicted even thouyotwas the previous Tennant that contaminated were less than 1% by statistical estimation.

    • Ok Roy, let’s play this game.

      A state house is tested for meth and it returns positive. Please tell us all who you move out?

  4. RNZ grilling of Bridges was pretty pathetic…easy to see whose side Guyon is on….let Bridges off the hook….no passion for injustice…

    Martyn Bradbury should be on Morning Report

  5. Think of it this way.
    Meth contamination found.
    kick the tennant out, refurbish the property at the tax payers expense.
    Flog off the house to one of the new immigrants coming into the country to replace kiwi workers at a much lower rate.
    Blame Labour.

  6. Hmm, looks like a group gathering of meth users to me, at least nobody died in an overseas hospital while the PM was on a $100k ego trip.

Comments are closed.