“Convergence Des Luttes” – A Convergence Of Struggles


EMMANUEL MACRON will be hoping that Mark Twain was wrong about history. In the French President’s ears, the celebrated American novelist’s famous observation that although history does not repeat itself, it sometimes rhymes, can hardly be reassuring.

Fifty years ago, exactly, Paris erupted in what looked like (and, by all accounts, felt like) a revolution. Fifty years on, the same groups that convulsed France in May-June 1968 are again occupying universities and participating in mass strikes.

There is, however, one feature of the 2018 situation that differs very greatly from 1968. Fifty years ago, the key strategic priority was to extend the political struggle into all sectors of French society. Today, the priority is to draw the divergent campaigns of students and workers closer together. Or, as the French Left put it: convergence des luttes – a convergence of struggles.

That the Left is required to reiterate the most fundamental tenet of collective action: unity is strength; is in many ways symbolic of what was won and lost in the upheavals of May-June 1968.

Crucial to achieving a proper understanding of “68” is accepting that politically it was a colossal failure. Convulsed France may have been by a succession of running street battles between university students and the feared French riot police, mass protest demonstrations, factory occupations and a wave of crippling strikes, but the overwhelming majority of French voters were not persuaded that revolutionary change was necessary. In the snap legislative elections of June 1968, called in response to the tumult in the streets, the government of the day won 353 of 486 seats in the Chamber of Deputies.

But, if “68” was not a political revolution, it most certainly heralded revolutionary changes in French society and culture and, thanks to France’s enormous influence on the world’s intellectual and artistic life, our own.

It was in 1968 that the great “metanarratives” of the 20th Century – socialism and communism in particular – began their long, slow fade into the cultural twilight. In the years that followed, the entire modernist project underwent a similar dissolution.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

In its place arose a new project – “post-modernism”. The failure of the grand metanarratives to deliver on their promises had encouraged the growth of an all-encompassing scepticism towards any person or party claiming to have a lock on “The Truth”. Indeed, the whole notion that “The Truth” could even be unlocked was subjected to unrelenting challenge. The idea that there might be as many truths as there were people to identify them won widespread philosophical acceptance. That there was just one universal and unchallengeable definition of reality was derided as the thinking of dead, white, males.

With the 1989-91 collapse of “actually existing socialism” in Eastern Europe and Russia, the forces of intellectual and cultural divergence gathered even more momentum. Questions of individual identity in a world where all kinds of boundaries were becoming blurred, or dissolving altogether, became increasingly important, and the prospect of maintaining, let alone forging, collective political unity was rendered increasingly problematic.

In what the French situationist philosopher, Guy Debord, dubbed the “society of the spectacle”, however, one crucial feature of the post-modernist condition had become harder and harder to discern. Capitalism, in the absence of its rival metanarratives – socialism and communism – had grown immeasurably stronger in a fast-changing world where, in Karl Marx’s famous phrase, “all that is solid melts into air”.

Capitalist technology’s frightening capacity to re-define humanity’s self-perceptions hid effortlessly in plain sight: its universal presence making it all the more difficult to see. Not without cause did the American literary critic and political philosopher, Fredric Jameson, describe post-modernism as “the cultural logic of late capitalism”. If everything can be true, then it becomes increasingly difficult to describe anything as false. If late capitalism’s cultural logic gave us post-modernism, then Donald Trump and his “fake news” can only be its logical outcome.

Except, of course, the social and economic consequences of late capitalism are not fake news – they are only too real. No matter how high capitalism’s apologists turn up the static, the blunt facts of joblessness and/or precarious employment; chronic indebtedness; unaffordable housing; rising poverty and in-your-face social inequality continue to constitute the lived experience of a growing percentage of the world’s citizens – even in its wealthiest nations. The society of the spectacle may constantly be driving them apart, but the inescapable reality of their daily lives is, with equal constancy, generating what the old Soviet communists used to call “the objective conditions” for their coming together.

One of the most memorable slogans of the 1968 “revolution that never happened” was the surrealist graffiti Sous les pavés, la plage! (Under the paving stones, the beach.) It captured perfectly the widespread feeling, especially among the young, that for all its materialistic “success”, the post-war world was one from which everything sensual and life-affirming had been bled out. The attributes that made them human, made life worth living, had been drained of colour; buried beneath tons of grey concrete; reduced to an unbearable sameness. In order to find the beach, they had first to tear up the paving-stones – and hurl them at the police.

Divergence, in 1968, made perfect psychic sense. But, politically, it made no sense at all. Emancipation, if it is to endure, must be a collective enterprise. The students and workers of 1968 only railed against the capitalism of their time in various – albeit highly imaginative – ways: the point was to change it.

Fifty years later, convergence des luttes – a convergence of struggles – is the only slogan that offers any hope of sparking a genuine and enduring revolution.




  1. If nothing else, socialism/communism offered an alternative by which to highlight the nature of extreme capitalism. I was talking to a friend on the bus who was putting down protesters in the US who are calling for socialism/capitalism. I pointed out that the chances of capitalism in the US being replaced by some sort of Stalinist or Maoist communism are zero but communism/socialism provides some sort of platform to try to reign in the extreme capitalism that exists there.

  2. What is described as capitalism is actually fascism.

    WW2 was not a war to defeat fascism but a war to decide which group of fascists would rule the world.

    Power always resides with the wealthy (especially when created OUT OF THIN AIR, and they will always be able to pay others to do their bidding.

  3. As long as bullets cost an arm and a leg, and every single one is registered to its purchaser, then Coltia.


  4. Fifty years ago the worldwide youth revolt that came to be known as the ‘1968 revolution’ began. This influential event will not be remembered very kindly, if at all, by our corporate MSM. Below is a NZ poem that was written about this topic over 30 years ago. It contains newspaper quotes from those heady times. In hindsight though, it’s apparent that the 68 revolution simply paved the way for the globalisation agenda that emerged triumphant from it.


    Back in 1968 there was a revolution ~ how do I know ~ I see it your face ~ running riot rampant in the bloody streets ~ a million young & agile feet ~ ‘you say you want a revolution’ ~ ‘street fighting man’ ~ salvos of tear gas ~ rifle butts swing ~ ‘the more I make revolution the more I want to make’ ~ ‘international underground known as the younger generation’ ~ ‘flash fires threatened every country’ ~ that’s what they thought ~ that’s what they did ~ that’s what they said ~ that’s what they lived ~ idealism in hope & love reached out beyond & far above ~ in blood sweat tears & hate a generation lived out its fate ~ they meant business they meant it well ~ they lived for the present there was no hell ~ ‘one does not compromise with society in the state of decomposition’ ~ ‘violence has become the orgasm of the young’ ~ ‘don’t look back the world we know is collapsing’ ~ ‘we want the world & we want it now’ ~ ‘we don’t care why, we don’t care how’ ~ ‘the whole wide world is watching us’ ~ the old they shrieked & they shuddered clutching the twisted reins of power ~ a brave new age a brave new anxiety ~ their ideals soared aiming high ~ much higher that you or I ~ if you open your eyes take a look around ~ you may still feel the spirit pulsing within you ~ ‘convulsion part carnival part anarchist spree’ ~ ‘it’s forbidden to forbid’ ~ ‘we are inventing a new & original world’ ~ red rimmed eyes from tear gas & lack of sleep ~ ‘we are watching a world wide revolutionary movement’ ~ and the cynic from the safety of the ivory tower asks ~ could yesterdays hero of his farce be today’s cornerstone ~ the oracle of repression ~ is today’s radical the myth in the making ~ tomorrows establishment practitioner of regression ~ well me ~ I’m proud to be a hypocrite ~ that’s no lie hey that’s a lie ~ how many lived lives can one live through ~ how many midwives can you look too ~ put up the barricades again ~ around & around we go.
    In the streets they’re marching ~ in the streets they’re dying ~ in the streets they’re bleeding ~ in the streets they’re lying ~ the tear gas ~ the batons ~ the bullets ~ the smell ~ the helplessness ~ the anger ~ tearing at your guts ~ destroying your brain ~ driving you insane ~ they want to laugh & cry ~ they want to dance ~ they want to romance ~ they want to be free ~ who reaps the benefits of what they sow ~ the order fascisate & all we don’t know ~ the red the black the white & grey ~ the left the right have all had their day & Martian said ‘let freedom reign’ ~ it’s raining all over the world ~ let freedom reign ~ let it rain

  5. The level of reported violence during the 1968 protests can be explained to some extent by events which occurred 7 years earlier. Reading the article ‘Paris Massacre of 1961’ in Wikipedia, the events described are almost unbelievable in the context of a modern western democracy. The person in charge of police at this time was later convicted of crimes against humanity, for unrelated crimes.

    The truth of these events was largely unknown by the french people and it is likely that the police in 1968 still contained many participants in these acts and felt they had a license to act. No-one was ever held to account for the events of 1961. It goes great way to explain the repression of Algerian minorities which has lead to their marginalisation to this day.

    Unfortunately the support for the contemporary demonstrators may not be wide spread until Macrons ‘reforms’ start to effect the more comfortably off.

Comments are closed.