NZ’s cowardly apology to Israel over settlements

By   /   June 16, 2017  /   4 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

When challenged directly on Morning Report, Brownlee wouldn’t criticise Israel’s settlement building policy, saying it was a matter for the parties concerned. Why bother to have a foreign policy if everything is just a matter for the parties concerned – despite, in this case, one having all the power over the other. The theft of Palestinian land is backed by Israel’s huge military machine.

I have respect for politicians if they are open and honest about their political views.

Conversely, I disrespect those who deceive and try to be on both sides of the fence at once.

It’s hard to know what angers me the most about Prime Minister Bill English and Foreign Minister Gerry Brownlee’s behaviour this week.

Is it the craven apology to Israel for co-sponsoring a good UN resolution last year criticising Israel’s settlement building on the West Bank?

Is it the pretense that this wasn’t an apology but just “regretting” the “fallout” from the resolution – when clearly the resolution aimed to produce the “fallout” of extra pressure on Israel to end settlement construction?

Or is it the continuing effort to cover up the apology by refusing to release Bill English’s letter to the Israeli PM? The excuse given is that the letter’s release would “prejudice the international relations of the government.” Translated, that means it would embarrass English and Brownlee.

When challenged directly on Morning Report, Brownlee wouldn’t criticise Israel’s settlement building policy, saying it was a matter for the parties concerned. Why bother to have a foreign policy if everything is just a matter for the parties concerned – despite, in this case, one having all the power over the other. The theft of Palestinian land is backed by Israel’s huge military machine.

Bill English has a slightly less hardline stance than Brownlee’s, but it’s also cowardly. Apparently “we stand by those positions” [presumably including opposing the settlements]. But don’t ask us to publicise those “positions” or support critical UN resolutions which so far have only “disrupted our relationship with Israel,” according to English.

Meanwhile the Israeli media is trumpeting New Zealand’s backdown and apology. Our government has let down the world community and particularly those 13 nations who voted with us for the Security Council resolution last year.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

4 Comments

  1. Francesca says:

    Couldn’t agree more Keith
    NZ’s reputation has just suffered another blow
    This was Egypt’s resolution, but Sisi was jointly heavied by an incoming Trump and Israel to drop it.
    NZ picked it up maybe because McCully was retiring, it was known the US would abstain(Obama’s parting shot to Netenyahu) ,NZ’s chance to speak out.
    With McCully out of it, damage control could swing in to action.
    Pretty sickening, oh for a truly values based foreign policy.

  2. countryboy says:

    Israel. The only territory occupiers that spread institutionalised narcissism globally.
    Big Bully Boy Jazza will be like a behemoth moth to the flame

  3. countryboy says:

    Vive Le France !

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/15/french-female-politician-left-unconscious-while-out-campaigning

    You see The Big Jizz ? Tell him he’s a ……..( I’ll let you fill in this space. ) …………. !

  4. Francesca says:

    I have a feeling we were doing Obama’s bidding with the resolution.Freed from the shackles of office he could take one last swing at “chicken shit” Netenyahu and briefly make things difficult for the incoming Trump
    It’s not like McCully has ever displayed much moral fortitude (he of the breeding flock lost in a Saudi sandstorm fiasco)
    We did the right thing for the wrong reason and then had to eat humble pie to get back in to line

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *