Christchurch City Council housing failure a tragedy for low-income families


Set aside for a moment the vast central city wasteland; the crumbling cathedral; the developers scrapping over retail tenants and hotel beds; the cowardly council implementing a National government agenda for Christchurch; Gerry Brownlee (enough said) and the corporate-driven disaster which is the Christchurch central reconstruction.

The real devastating failure of the city rebuild is the plight of low-income families left high and dry by the Christchurch City Council.

Six years on from the devastating Christchurch earthquakes the Christchurch City Council is still 357 houses short of what it had before the earthquakes.

At 1st September 2010, the council had 2649 council homes for rent but only 2292 available for rent as of 11th December 2016, according to figures from an Official Information Act request.

- Sponsor Promotion -

Despite 459 council homes having been demolished after the earthquakes only 61 (sic) new units have been completed since 1 September 2010. (A further 42 units will be demolished this year!)

Providing housing for the most vulnerable families in the wake of the earthquakes should have been the first council priority. It wasn’t.

Low-income families have been struggling with housing costs since then and despite the recent levelling off in private rental housing costs they remain artificially high because of the council’s failure to rebuild its housing stock.

The council should hang its head in shame.

Had the council prioritised rebuilding affordable housing, private rental costs across the city would be considerably lower than the very high rates being charged today.

All families in the private rental market are losers because of this moral and social failure.

The transfer of the council’s housing stock to the Otautahi Housing Trust, which took place on 1 October last year, will make the situation worse. The Trust does not have the resources or the capacity to build the homes required for tenants and families on low incomes.

The council must be forced to ramp up its building programme for council housing as an urgent priority and to vigorously oppose the government plans to sell 2,500 state houses in Christchurch.

Neither the council nor the government must be allowed to walk away from responsibility for housing families on low incomes.


  1. Do you have figures for HNZ stock pre quakes and now as well by any chance?…suspect it will be a similar story compounding the problem.

    • Murderous NatZ cabal as usual with the new leader as bad as the last one John.

      Time to banish them all this year mate for sure.

  2. In 2012 the government removed all the welfare aspects of the Local Government Act of 2002.

    Councils are now free to spend public money on anything they like -especially boondoggles and rorts like artworks and parking for hotels- and get communities into greater debt, and not be held to account for any action. Although they are required to plan for the REAL FUTURE, none of them do.

    Anyone who thinks city, district and regional councils are not the enemy is grossly uninformed or is deluded.

  3. Right on Mr Minto.

    ALL rents in low/middle income areas are artificially high.
    A housing market thats artificially high, with landlord subsidised by the Accommodation allowance and Working for Families.

    The clock is ticking…its time to start thinking about State Housing for all life time renters. State Housing and the work of The Housing Corporation in the 70s, wasn’t just brought in for the most vulnerable…it WAS a mechanism to provide a large number of families and individuals with a secure home.

    Why are politicians leaving so many people out in the cold, to be exploited by landlords??
    Why is the ‘Kiwi Dream’ as talked about by Labour, only available to those who can one day own their own home??
    What are renters supposed to live for ‘The Kiwi Dream of Subsidising Someone Elses Retirement?’.

Comments are closed.