Hekia Parata breaks law – ignores Official Information Act

By   /   December 1, 2015  /   21 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

A formal complaint has been laid with the Ombudsman’s Office after Education Minister, Hekia Parata, failed to comply with the Official Information Act.

.

official-information-act-OIA-NZ

.

A formal complaint has been laid with the Ombudsman’s Office after Education Minister, Hekia Parata, failed to comply with the Official Information Act.

A OIA request was lodged with the Minister’s Office by this blogger, seeking details of National’s Food In Schools programme, which was announced in May 2013. The limited programme, costed at $9.5 million, offered low decile 1-4 schools free milk and Weet-Bix throughout the school week. It would be run in conjunction with Fonterra, Sanitarium and children’s charity KidsCan.

The $9.5 million would be spread over a five year period, from 2013 to 2018.

More critically for National, the expanded “Kick Start” breakfast programme was promoted to directly counter Hone Harawira’s more comprehensive Education (Breakfast and Lunch Programmes in Schools) Amendment Bill which at the time was rapidly gaining traction throughout the country.

.

food in schools

Acknowledgement: Radio NZ

.

Mana Party leader and then-MP for Te Tai Tokerau, Hone Harawira, said on 24 January, 2013;

It’s a pretty simple bill really. Invest in making sure the 80,000 kids going to school hungry each week are fed and ready to learn and realise the benefits in better educated and healthier school leavers down the track”.

In Parliament, Harawira was clear on the benefits of his Food in Schools Bill;

It is nice to know that KidsCan feeds some 10,000 of them on most days, and that the KickStart Breakfast programme feeds about 12,000 a day, but the reality is that even with the Government’s announcement in last year’s Budget, nearly 80,000 children are still going to school hungry in Aotearoa every single day. Yes, schools around the country have started their own breakfast clubs with support from teachers, students, parents, local businesses, and the wider community, but they tell us that it takes a lot of hard work and a lot of goodwill to keep them going, and that having secure funding would be a godsend.

The really embarrassing thing is that nearly every country in the OECD, apart from us, already runs programmes to feed kids at school. Some countries like Finland and Sweden provide fully State-funded meals to every school student as part of a wider framework of child well-being. It is a commitment that sees them regularly top the international surveys in child health and educational achievement. Some countries provide free meals to kids with parents on low incomes, and others provide free meals to schools in areas of high deprivation. But although the approaches differ, they all share the same view, backed up by the same kind of research and information from teachers, doctors, nurses, and policy analysts that is available to us here: kids need a good feed every day if they are to develop into healthy and well-educated adults. New Zealand really needs to join the rest of the enlightened world and make a commitment to feeding our kids, starting with those in greatest need, to help them to grow well and learn well.

Harawira’s Bill was supported by a range of diverse groups and individuals ranging from Jamie Oliver’s Food Foundation, the NZ Educational Institute, as well as Child Poverty Action Group, Every Child Counts, Unicef NZ, Save the Children, IHC, Poverty Action Waikato, the Methodist and Anglican Churches (Methodist Public Issues and Anglican Action), Te Rōpū Wāhine Māori Toko i te Ora (Māori Women’s Welfare League), PPTA, NZ Principals’ Federation, CTU Rūnanga, the NZ Nurses’ Organisation, and Te Ora – the Māori Medical Practitioners’ Association.

Harawira’s Bill was estimated to cost upwards of $100 million.

This contrasts with the  Children Commissioner’s Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty, which reported in December 2012 that the total economic costs of child poverty ranged up to $8 billion;

Currently, the economic costs of child poverty are in the range of $6-8 billion per year
and considerable sums of public money are spent annually on remedial interventions. Failure
to alleviate child poverty now will damage the nation’s long-term prosperity. It will also
undermine the achievement of other important policy priorities, such as reducing child abuse,
lifting educational attainment and improving skill levels.

In July 2013, Herald journalist, Kate Shuttleworth, reported;

In December 2012 the Expert Advisory Group on solutions to Child Poverty – a group comprising policy, public health and law experts – recommended that a food programme starting with decile 1-to-4 primary and intermediate schools, be implemented as one of their six initial priorities for immediate release.

[…]

Figures show 270,000 children in New Zealand – one in four – live in poverty.

Dennis McKinlay, Chairman of ‘Every Child Counts‘,  stated that 169 countries had a food in schools programme.

Shockingly, the Bill was eventually defeated in a Parliamentary vote of 61 votes to 59, with ACT and Peter Dunne also voting against it. The New Zealand government spends billions on school infra-structure, but not to feed hungry school-children from poverty-stricken families.

On 27 October, this blogger lodged a OIA request with Education minister, Hekia Parata. The request sought answers to the following;

1. How much has been spent on the programme since 28 May 2013?

2. Is the funding still set at $9.5 million, over a 5 year period from 2013 to 2018?

3. How many schools are part of the programme?

4. It was initially available in decile 1 to decile 4 schools. Higher decile schools would be able to opt in from 2014. How many other, higher decile schools have opted into the programme?

5. Are there any figures as to how many children are participating in the programme? If so, what is that data?

6. Is there a time limit as to the length of time a school can participate in the programme?

7. Have any schools been declined participation in the programme? How many? For what reason?

8. Are Sanitarium and dairy cooperative Fonterra still participating in the programme? Have any other companies joined in?

9. Does the KickStart programme in any way affect a schools allocated budget?

10. Have any Charter Schools requested to join the programme? If so, how does this affect their funding?

By 12 November, after no response or even an acknowledgement, this blogger wrote again to Minister Parata;

On 27 October, I lodged this OIA request with your office. I have recieved no reply or even an acknowledgement.

Please advice whether or not you intend to respond to my OIA request. If not, I will proceed by laying a complaint with the Ombudsman’s Office.

As at 29 November, no response had been forthcoming from the Minister’s office, and a complaint was laid with the Ombudsman’s Office. As this blogger pointer out in the complaint;

I do not believe it is satisfactory that a Minister of the Crown wilfully ignores the law and fails to follow her obligations under the Official Information Act.

Readers of The Daily Blog will be kept updated as this issue progresses.

.

.

.

Addendum1

Parata has apparently “gone to ground” on this issue. It is not the first time she failed failed to respond to media enquiries; requests for interviews; or fronted at events for which she has direct responsibility.

From a blogpost published on 18 January 2013;

Muppet #1 – Hekia Parata

.

I actually think she’s a very effective communicator; in fact if you look at her history in politics, she’s been one of the smoothest communicators we’ve actually had.” – John Key, 18 January 2013

See: Parata safe in her job – Key

Prime Minister John Key says Education Minister Hekia Parata will be safe in an upcoming Cabinet reshuffle, … because she is hugely talented and one of National’s best communicators.

See: Parata’s job safe in shuffle

*snort!*

I’d be a happy chappy if the Nats DID have more like her in Cabinet!!

If she’s one of the Nat’s “best communicators”, I’d luv to know why she’s kept ducking calls for media interviews and instead sent Lesley Longstone to cover for Parata’s f**k-ups,

.

2 October 2012

lesley longstone fronts instead of hekia parata (2)

.

3 October 2012

Ministry of Education admits some errors in data

.

4 October 2012

Education Minister avoids her critics

.

26 October 2012

lesley longstone fronts instead of hekia parata (3)

.

29 October 2013

Longstone challenged to find solutions

.

14 November 2012

lesley longstone fronts instead of hekia parata (1)

.

28 November 2012

lesley longstone Schools still beset by Novopay problems

.

When Lesley Longstone’s resignation was announced last year on 19 December, Hekia Parata was still nowhere to be seen. The announcement was handled by State Services Commissioner Iain Rennie (see:  Education secretary quits),

.

19 December 2012

lesley longstone Education secretary quits

.

20 December 2012

lesley longstone Parata, Key refuse to front over education debacle

.

Parata’s office explained why she couldn’t front,

Parata is currently on holiday and has refused to front on Longstone’s resignation, but in a statement released this afternoon she thanked Longstone for her efforts in leading the Ministry.

See: Education Ministry boss quits after ‘strained relationship’

Hmmmm, judging by Parata not fronting for most of last year, was she on holiday for most of 2012?!

“Smooth communicator…”!?

Ye gods, this deserves a Tui billboard.

Roll on 2013 – it’s going to be a great year.

Addendum2

In January 2013, Hekia Parata’s responsibilities surrounding Novopay were transferred to Minister For Everything, Steven Joyce. Joyce was not above publicly denouncing those responsible for the Novopay debacle;

.

government-sticking-with-novopay-for-now

.

.

.

References

Kickstart Breakfast Programme

Radio NZ: Food in schools ‘could get good results’

Feedthekids: Support grows for MANA’s Feed the Kids Bill

Parliament: Harawira, Hone: Education (Breakfast and Lunch Programmes in Schools) Amendment Bill — First Reading

Feedthekids: Feed the Kids Bill a “good initiative” – Jamie Oliver Food Foundation

NZEI: Food in schools bill will help children learn

NZ Herald: Food in schools bill delayed for second time

Commissioner for Children:  Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty

NZ Herald: Head boy disappointed in Dunne over food bill

ODT: Joyce to take on handling of Novopay

Every Child Counts

Radio NZ: Government sticking with Novopay for now

Previous related blogposts

Parata, Bennett, and Collins – what have they been up to?

Karma for Key?

.

.

.

The hypocrisy from world leaders overCharlie begins to rattle observers. NZ's John Key's words of January 8 in particular raised many eyebrows amongst the'4th Estate'. Rod Emmerson 14/01/15

 

.

.

= fs =

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

21 Comments

  1. Peter Archer says:

    Parata is a DISGRACE, but, she is in good company, as the current cabinet is a SICK JOKE, stuffed full of incompetents and frauds.

    • BruceTheMoose says:

      With her appalling, arrogant handling of the schools in Christchurch, she is public political enemy No.2 there.
      In 1st place for disgrace, Brownlee is untouchable. It’s about the only thing he excels at.

  2. dav says:

    criminal actions from a criminal govt, how very un-surprising.

  3. Priss says:

    Part of the problem of the OIA is there aren’t any sanctions when Ministers break the law. None at all.
    Compare that to going over the speed limit by 4km.
    Compare that to Nicky Hager’s house being raided by NZ’s own Stasi.

    So it’s a joke. If ministers can pick and choose how they comply with the OIA (or not at all) then it’s futile to have it in the first place.

  4. roy says:

    They don’t even *look* like they’re pretending to try anymore. And really, why wouldn’t they?

    What are we going to do, vote them out ?

  5. Mike in Auckland says:

    Frank, this is the norm under this government, it is the norm that OIA responses are not provided within the time frame of 20 working days, and even not after extended time, which they often seek, and then afterwards Ministries and Departments do still ignore the law.

    I have heard of numerous such incidents, and sadly, the Ombudsman is not forceful at all, and just lets such complaints pile up, and their staff work through them bit by bit, but at best only remind the government departments to perhaps respond, which in many cases only delivers a part of the information sought.

    Here are some examples, what MSD have been doing:
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.wordpress.com/2015/11/27/msds-selective-and-poor-responses-to-new-oia-requests-on-benefits-advisors-reports-mental-health-and-sole-parent-employment-services/

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/mental-health-and-sole-parent-employment-services-msd-withholds-o-i-a-information-that-may-prove-their-trials-a-failure/

    A recent response, again not answering all questions:
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/msd-oia-rqst-dr-bratt-mhes-spes-waa-reports-winz-sundry-data-08-07-reply-anon-19-11-15.pdf

    The questions that were actually asked, and info requested:
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/msd-o-i-a-request-to-c-e-of-m-s-d-base-benefit-break-down-anon-08-07-15.pdf

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/msd-o-i-a-request-to-c-e-of-msd-bratt-hd-panel-reforms-anon-08-07-15.pdf

    More stuff to consider:
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/msd-dr-bratt-present-misleading-evidence-on-worklessness-and-health-post-09-08-15.pdf

    Earlier request and responses, delivered bit by bit, some only after a complaint was sent to the Ombudsman:
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/msd-o-i-a-rqst-re-dr-bratt-presentations-contacts-anon-ltr-w-questions-16-01-14.pdf

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/msd-o-i-a-rqst-re-dr-bratt-presentations-contacts-anon-16-01-reply-by-ce-27-02-14.pdf

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/msd-o-i-a-rqst-re-dr-bratt-presentations-contacts-anon-16-01-further-reply-12-11-14.pdf

    So you seem to be in good company, Frank, it happens all the time, it seems. One law for the government, another one for the ordinary mortals, whether they are working or worse so if they “dare” to depend on taxpayer funded “benefits” the “riff raff” of “humanity” in NZ, I suppose?!

  6. Pete says:

    This Government is corrupt.

  7. Anon says:

    This governments utter contempt and sheer arrogance in dealing with the OIA process is genuinely disturbing. OIAs are used to hold the government to account. The fact that this process, on the one hand, has been disregarded if the information is deemed even slightly “damaging” to the specific department, yet on the other hand has been used by national party stooges (ie: Slater) to get information within HOURS of the request being placed, is not only disgusting, it’s immoral and has a vague odour of corruption.

  8. Steve King says:

    “I actually think she’s a very effective communicator; in fact if you look at her history in politics, she’s been one of the smoothest communicators we’ve actually had.” – John Key, 18 January 2013

    If you’re going to tell a lie, make it a feckin’ big one.

  9. ***Update**

    The Ombudsman’s Office has acknowledged receipt of my complaint as at 3.14pm today.

    The cogs begin to grind and turn slowwwwwly…

  10. Kim Dandy says:

    The start of a slippery slope…

  11. Jollo says:

    I kind of feel that is is people who deluge offices like this with spurious OIA’s who will do nothing useful or helpful with the information, that are the cause of delays and lack of compliance.

    Leave it for people who are attempting to do more than just illicit a late response so they can complain and whine about it.

    • Mike in Auckland says:

      WTF do you mean, the mainstream media are full of arrogance, so many of them working in it, they have been PRESENTED some of the info that some OIA requesters asked for, and DID STUFF ALL, not report on it, simply, because they thought, the public are wanting more “exciting” spin, drivel and trivial shit, like who screwed who, who said what, which Royal visits NZ, who has the best new flag idea, and what John Farting Key (the shower urinator) is planning next for his overseas trip.

      I think you just fell for dumb down media and the nonsense we get presented 24/7, I sadly take note, you are the product of a wasted, hopeless society, that no longer even understands what matters, which includes transparency, accountability and honesty of the ones in power, which we no longer have.

      Sip on your beverage and take a holiday, I fear your body and cerebellum may need it.

    • Just to re-cap, Jollo, the ten questions I put to Ms Parata were;

      1. How much has been spent on the programme since 28 May 2013?

      2. Is the funding still set at $9.5 million, over a 5 year period from 2013 to 2018?

      3. How many schools are part of the programme?

      4. It was initially available in decile 1 to decile 4 schools. Higher decile schools would be able to opt in from 2014. How many other, higher decile schools have opted into the programme?
      5. Are there any figures as to how many children are participating in the programme? If so, what is that data?

      6. Is there a time limit as to the length of time a school can participate in the programme?

      7. Have any schools been declined participation in the programme? How many? For what reason?

      8. Are Sanitarium and dairy cooperative Fonterra still participating in the programme? Have any other companies joined in?

      9. Does the KickStart programme in any way affect a schools allocated budget?
      10. Have any Charter Schools requested to join the programme? If so, how does this affect their funding?

      Considering the multi-million dollar cost of the “KickStart” programme and that it is targetted at the poorest kids in our society, I think it warranted some information to see how well (or not) it was doing. Don’t you?

      The story here isn’t any response to the ten questions – it’s that the Minister has broken the law by failing to respond.

      I thought you Righties were big on law and order? Evidently not.

  12. […] blogpost was first published on The Daily Blog on 1 December […]


 
Authorised by Martyn Bradbury, The Editor, TheDailyBlog,