Very likely you will choose not to include this comment as it does not agree with your beliefs. Seems someone at TDB is a major fan of Chomsky’s ( and I used to be too ) but now it seems you wish to silence anyone who disagrees and delete certain comments.
Maybe this comment will get through ? Maybe not ?
Check out the facts. Distrust in Chomsky is growing. He is a closet capitalist and a hypocrite who preaches the evils of profits and tax havens while selling his services for HEFTY prices and tries to keep it from Uncle Sam. He accepts money from prominent institutions whose policies he supposedly opposes.
HIS STOCK PORTFOLIO INCLUDES BIG OIL COMPANIES; MILITARY CONTRACTORS; ===>> PHARMACEUTICALS etc. all whom he finds abhorrent and speaks out against. He and Amy Goodman ( Democracy Now ) are among many ” Left Gatekeepers “. Check it out.
Look at his connections with regards to why he refuses to look at the truths behind 9 / 11 .
Who is paying whom and who is protecting whom and why are some refusing to discuss 9 / 11 ?
Current News | Introduction | Colloidal Silver | Chemtrails | Sylphs | Emerging Diseases | Forbidden Cures | Ozone | Immunity Boosting | Nutrition | Tone Gen
Mind-Body Connection | Ozone | Bioelectrification | Story on Drugs | Vaccine Dangers | Cancer | Newsletter | New World Order | NWO News | Pam Schuffert
James Casbolt | Phil Schneider | Al Bielek | Trevor Constable | Mind Control | Brice Taylor | Ted Gunderson | Metatech.org | Free Energy | Tim Hicks & Phil Ledoux |
Dr. Robert Bitzer | T. Lobsang Rampa | Ruth Drown | ZS Livingstone | David Brandt | Gary Wade | The CIA | Veterans Awaken | Tony Cartalucci in Thailand
Depleted Uranium | Dowsing | Police & Tasers | Rev. Moon | British Israel | Born Again Brainwashing | Amy Goodman Gatekeeper | Rethinking Noam Chomsky
Red Elk | Project Blue Beam | Bush Family & Nazis | Otto Skorzeny | Insights on Aliens | Cell Towers | WiFi/Cell Phone Dangers | EMF Radiation News
CPS/DCF Tyranny | Adrenal Burnout | The Women Warriors | Orgone Adventures | Dr. John Coleman | Railroading Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald | Henry Makow |
Radio Interviews | Ten Best Sites | Metal Free Dentistry | Dr. Hulda Clark Books | Planet X Sequel | ‘Undocumented Immigrants’ | Donald Marshall & Cloning Station
War on Terror | Tavistock | U.S. Concentration Camps | FEMA | Aliens Are Coming! | Guiding Principles | Global Warming | Gang Stalking | Monoatomic Gold
Eustace Mullins | Bill Cooper | Power of Thought | Spiritualism | Hope | Healing Thought Forms | Vanquish Fear | Prevent Alien/Demon Attacks | Rockefeller File | War a Racket
Letters | Sodom-LGBT Exp’d | 21 Illuminati Goals | Strawman Explained | Daily Blog | Global Warming | Hydrogen Peroxide | Protocols of Zion | Eric Jon Phelps Exposed |
Israeli Soldier’s Story | Home | Japan Radiation Hysteria | Agenda 21 | Treat Parasites | Swine Flu Hoax/Vaccine | Links | Contact Us/ E-mail | Jane Tripp Time Travel | Discussion
This excerpt on chemtrails and sylphs is typical;
I’ve done a number of radio interviews with Don Nicoloff on the subject of chemtrails and Sylphs. The three radio show listed here will give you a good idea on the overall agenda of chemtrail spraying and how they are mitigated throuigh the use of orgone generators and focused intent. Air elemental beings identified by the ancient Greeks (& Paracelsus) as Sylphs are stimulated and energized by orgone generators and will literally vacumn up and transmute chemtrails into harmless substances. I realize this is hard to believe by the average person who is unaware of these etheric beings, but the evidence can be seen right over your head if you know what to look for
I think we need something more credible than that website, Blake?
Iv already gone over the fallacy educate-yourself. How it flame baits. How it’s no better than Cameron slater on ice.
Those that read that site really believe the system is beyond saving. They come from all those people who don’t vote. Trying to dissuade users of conspiracy theory websites is like trying to motivate non voters to vote.
Honestly conspiracy theorists are with out sapien, and should be ignored.
Thankfully the youth are not easily seduced by deluded claims. You can’t tell a child climate isn’t real and that the 1% hasn’t caused it. Because they study this stuff in environment classes.
Just because you have gone ” over the fallacy ” about educate-yourself website does not make it true or right.
I question your authority as I question all authority now. That website clearly touches nerves with all the untrue propaganda misrepresenting it and misjudging it. The truth coming out and then denying it, calling it a ” conspiracy theory ” is the plan, so Sam, get familiar with who coined the term ” conspiracy theory ” and why. Learn about why it is used to diminish and mislead and discredit the truth-seekers and whistle-blowers etc, and who coined it and and why you and others misuse it.
Biased untrue info that often comes spewing out of Slaters site is rubbish and we all know it but please, do not compare such rubbish with an educational website that puts out most truths you deny and will not see many other places.
The very term cons. theory is meant to label anything that does not go along with the idiots in charge, those who own most govts and the media and plan a new world order, etc.
Why ? TDB – are you picking and choosing what comments that get on depending mostly on whether you agree with it ? and why did you chose not to include the one I submitted yesterday here about Noam ?
[Blake, you may have missed the explanation I have given to many other people, but which I’ll share with you. The Daily Blog is a website paid for by it’s administrators. They pay for the server-lease. As such, it is theirs to do with as they wish.
As a member of the visiting public, you are a guest here. You do not have property-rights. Nor do you (or anyone else) have automatic posting rights.
Just as newspaper editors are not obliged to publish every single letter-to-the editor they receive.
For the most part, we do Approve and publish most submitted comments. Occassionally we will decline Approval. That can be for any number of reasons.
If you disagree with this policy, you’re entitled to your view. You’re also entitled to create your own blog and publish whatever (within legal boundaries and your own conscience) you wish.
I hope that’s clarified the issue for you? – ScarletMod]
Seems like a bit of deception and the very media control and biased journalism to me and I thought that TDB was above that mostly, if not always. This is twice I have been disappointed in your decision to not include a comment but more importantly is why you would chose to show the ugly side of biased journalism I thought you were above.
Please re-consider and put up the comment I submitted yesterday here on the daily chomsky.
Is there a pro-chomsky bias going on here – Martyn ?
Frank stated he could not connect with a link I put up so I posted it again as sometimes they are wrong and you decided to not include it nor do you now give me the option to change or delete my comments.
Whats going on Martyn?
Can you please put up the comment I submitted here as it appears that a slight bit of ugliness is displayed that I am not used to in this unique and fair minded blog site. A bit confused and disappointed.
Yesterday, I submitted a reply to the above comment by ScarletMod ( aka ? ) and she ( he ? ) chose not to include it. Also for some odd reason ? I am no longer allowed to delete or change my comments directly after submitting them.
It is foolish to assume that I feel you should publish every comment.
It is also foolish to recommend that someone start their own blog – sounds like you are scolding naughty me and telling me to take my toys and play elsewhere. A bit childish.
My continued concern is why you would choose to not publish my comments ( especially about Noam – and clearly you disagree with me ) when there is no hate and no misleading info included in my comments ?
Lets see if this comment gets through ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? [Blake, in case you’ve missed it, we are not obliged to publish anything. I have made this point before to other posters. If you don’t understand this, I invite you to set up your own blog and pay for the server fees yourself. – ScarletMod]
Mr. ScarletMod – you have told me three times now that I am welcome to set up my own blog and pay for the server fees myself. I get the message, loud and clear. No need to beat a dead horse.
I have no time to set up any blog site and barely time to write these comments that appear to be vilified and not appreciated by a few. No sweat and no tears flowing. I could care less whether I am agreed with or not and we all have our rights to our opinions and our beliefs, narrow and short sighted as most are.
I just wish for more journalistic avenues based on truths and integrity and rights to free speech and not much journalistic bias. I was as shocked as the next person about a few of the truths behind Noam but then you can lead a horse to water but you can not force her to drink. Healthy debate is a good thing.
Foreign policy + Intel + Security
Subscribe | Follow | Bookmarkand join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday
MIL Public Webcast Service
Very likely you will choose not to include this comment as it does not agree with your beliefs. Seems someone at TDB is a major fan of Chomsky’s ( and I used to be too ) but now it seems you wish to silence anyone who disagrees and delete certain comments.
Maybe this comment will get through ? Maybe not ?
Check out the facts. Distrust in Chomsky is growing. He is a closet capitalist and a hypocrite who preaches the evils of profits and tax havens while selling his services for HEFTY prices and tries to keep it from Uncle Sam. He accepts money from prominent institutions whose policies he supposedly opposes.
HIS STOCK PORTFOLIO INCLUDES BIG OIL COMPANIES; MILITARY CONTRACTORS; ===>> PHARMACEUTICALS etc. all whom he finds abhorrent and speaks out against. He and Amy Goodman ( Democracy Now ) are among many ” Left Gatekeepers “. Check it out.
Look at his connections with regards to why he refuses to look at the truths behind 9 / 11 .
Who is paying whom and who is protecting whom and why are some refusing to discuss 9 / 11 ?
http://ziomania.com/chomsky/Do%20as%20I%20say%20not%20as%20I%20do.html
https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=MRdIAV5IVgoC&pg=PA549&lpg=PA549&dq=distrust+of+noam+chomsky&source=bl&ots=slnNId6280&sig=DF1oKFlCJpRh0uPCTayL5FLSdgE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CC4Q6AEwA2oVChMI7rrwmIHwyAIVxy-mCh19qg-W#v=onepage&q=distrust%20of%20noam%20chomsky&f=false
http://www.educate-yourself.org/cn/noamchomskyindex.shtml
http://ziomania.com/chomsky/Do%20as%20I%20say%20not%20as%20I%20do.html – “404 Not Found”
http://www.educate-yourself.org/cn/noamchomskyindex.shtml – Some kind of conspiracy website with some very bizarre stories;
This excerpt on chemtrails and sylphs is typical;
I think we need something more credible than that website, Blake?
Iv already gone over the fallacy educate-yourself. How it flame baits. How it’s no better than Cameron slater on ice.
Those that read that site really believe the system is beyond saving. They come from all those people who don’t vote. Trying to dissuade users of conspiracy theory websites is like trying to motivate non voters to vote.
Honestly conspiracy theorists are with out sapien, and should be ignored.
Thankfully the youth are not easily seduced by deluded claims. You can’t tell a child climate isn’t real and that the 1% hasn’t caused it. Because they study this stuff in environment classes.
Just because you have gone ” over the fallacy ” about educate-yourself website does not make it true or right.
I question your authority as I question all authority now. That website clearly touches nerves with all the untrue propaganda misrepresenting it and misjudging it. The truth coming out and then denying it, calling it a ” conspiracy theory ” is the plan, so Sam, get familiar with who coined the term ” conspiracy theory ” and why. Learn about why it is used to diminish and mislead and discredit the truth-seekers and whistle-blowers etc, and who coined it and and why you and others misuse it.
Biased untrue info that often comes spewing out of Slaters site is rubbish and we all know it but please, do not compare such rubbish with an educational website that puts out most truths you deny and will not see many other places.
The very term cons. theory is meant to label anything that does not go along with the idiots in charge, those who own most govts and the media and plan a new world order, etc.
Why ? TDB – are you picking and choosing what comments that get on depending mostly on whether you agree with it ? and why did you chose not to include the one I submitted yesterday here about Noam ?
[Blake, you may have missed the explanation I have given to many other people, but which I’ll share with you. The Daily Blog is a website paid for by it’s administrators. They pay for the server-lease. As such, it is theirs to do with as they wish.
As a member of the visiting public, you are a guest here. You do not have property-rights. Nor do you (or anyone else) have automatic posting rights.
Just as newspaper editors are not obliged to publish every single letter-to-the editor they receive.
For the most part, we do Approve and publish most submitted comments. Occassionally we will decline Approval. That can be for any number of reasons.
If you disagree with this policy, you’re entitled to your view. You’re also entitled to create your own blog and publish whatever (within legal boundaries and your own conscience) you wish.
I hope that’s clarified the issue for you? – ScarletMod]
Seems like a bit of deception and the very media control and biased journalism to me and I thought that TDB was above that mostly, if not always. This is twice I have been disappointed in your decision to not include a comment but more importantly is why you would chose to show the ugly side of biased journalism I thought you were above.
Please re-consider and put up the comment I submitted yesterday here on the daily chomsky.
Is there a pro-chomsky bias going on here – Martyn ?
Frank stated he could not connect with a link I put up so I posted it again as sometimes they are wrong and you decided to not include it nor do you now give me the option to change or delete my comments.
Whats going on Martyn?
Can you please put up the comment I submitted here as it appears that a slight bit of ugliness is displayed that I am not used to in this unique and fair minded blog site. A bit confused and disappointed.
[Blake, in case you have missed it, we do not post repetitive comments. I refer you to our Posting Guide (and by “Guide”, it is not up for negotiation). https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2015/07/07/public-notice-posting-privileges-up-date/ . Please note Para 4. Thank you for your co-operation. – ScarletMod]
Yesterday, I submitted a reply to the above comment by ScarletMod ( aka ? ) and she ( he ? ) chose not to include it. Also for some odd reason ? I am no longer allowed to delete or change my comments directly after submitting them.
It is foolish to assume that I feel you should publish every comment.
It is also foolish to recommend that someone start their own blog – sounds like you are scolding naughty me and telling me to take my toys and play elsewhere. A bit childish.
My continued concern is why you would choose to not publish my comments ( especially about Noam – and clearly you disagree with me ) when there is no hate and no misleading info included in my comments ?
Lets see if this comment gets through ?? ? ?? ? ?? ?
[Blake, in case you’ve missed it, we are not obliged to publish anything. I have made this point before to other posters. If you don’t understand this, I invite you to set up your own blog and pay for the server fees yourself. – ScarletMod]
Mr. ScarletMod – you have told me three times now that I am welcome to set up my own blog and pay for the server fees myself. I get the message, loud and clear. No need to beat a dead horse.
I have no time to set up any blog site and barely time to write these comments that appear to be vilified and not appreciated by a few. No sweat and no tears flowing. I could care less whether I am agreed with or not and we all have our rights to our opinions and our beliefs, narrow and short sighted as most are.
I just wish for more journalistic avenues based on truths and integrity and rights to free speech and not much journalistic bias. I was as shocked as the next person about a few of the truths behind Noam but then you can lead a horse to water but you can not force her to drink. Healthy debate is a good thing.
Comments are closed.