GUEST BLOG: Donna Miles – Inverted dirty politics- blue turns on blue



I have been scratching my head for a while. How is it that a supposedly right-wing PR operator like Hooton has become so effective at undermining John Key and his government?

From the Casino deal to the sheep gate, Hooton has been putting forward some of the most compelling and damaging arguments against the Government since Nicky Hager’s dirty politics revelations.

What makes Hooton’s attacks particularly venomous for the Government is that their effects cannot be diluted in discussions about political motives. Hooton, after all, is a true blue through and through.

But why would a right-wing PR operator set his sights at destroying a National government?

Chris Trotter offers his theories here but the clear drift between John Key and Mathew Hooton is perhaps best described by Hooton’s previous grapple with alcohol dependency and John Key’s possible interference with some of his work contracts. More details on that can be found here.

Whatever the cause of the drift maybe, the main question is whether there is a method to Hooton’s madness.

I think there is. Let’s start with the budget.

TDB Recommends

Bill English’s 2015 budget could best be labeled as a “damage control” budget. Clearly, the visible damage caused by 7 years of neoliberal policies was beginning to bite into the public’s consciousness at an increasing rate.

The Greens, in particular, were very effective at highlighting the plight of poor children who, unlike their parents, could not possibly be blamed for making bad choices.

John Key, in his victory speech at the 2014 general election, had promised a “brighter future for all New Zealanders”. It was becoming clear, however, that this brighter future was all but a distant mirage for many New Zealanders who struggle daily with increasing debts, poor housing, underemployment etc.

Furthermore, the feedback from the recent general election in the UK showed that many had voted for the Tories with their heads hung low. Something had to be done to give neo-liberalism a veneer of compassion.

A series of small steps (in place of much needed giant leaps) were taken in order to give the impression that the Government cared enough to address the issue of poverty.

Mathew Hooton’s post-budget tweets berated the Government and declared them ideologically bankrupt.  Hooton suggested that the budget proved that the Government was moving dangerously to the Left by abandoning their right-wing policies of lowering taxes and limiting social welfare.

As Chris Trotter clearly explained in his blog, Hooton’s lamentations are entirely baseless. Hooton knows this too but he is clearly out to alarm those with vested interest in the triumph of neoliberal policies in New Zealand.

Deep-pocketed neoliberals are not easily ignored because they are the ones that bankroll the National Party’s campaign during the elections and many National MPs are acutely aware of this fact.

Hooton’s post sheep gate’s tweets, declared John Key impotent and argued that the only reason that Murray McCully had not been sacked was because John Key feared what McCully could do to him from the backbenches.

The reference to backbenchers in Hooton’s tweet is interesting because backbenches is of course where Judith Collins has been waiting in exile.

It is my theory that Hooton is planning a quiet internal revolution against John Key whose leadership, like his success as a currency trader, has been underpinned, primarily, by an insatiable desire to win rather than any ideological beliefs or commitments.

Ex-currency trader John Key undoubtedly understands the value of data and trends. He knows that the only way to maintain power is by juggling the interests of his financial backers with the wishes of his voters, many of whom, unlike the corporatized neoliberal minds, care about social cohesion in New Zealand.

People like David Farrar and Cameron Slater have been the pillars of John key’s success. Careful manipulation of media, through dirty politics and other means, have been essential in shaping public opinions which are frequently tested by Farrar for monitoring and refining approaches to policy and PR campaigns.

Key has been able to play a political game of optimization by formulating policies that achieve an optimum harmony between the wishes of his voters (manufactured as they maybe) and his Party’s neoliberal financial backers.

But alas neoliberalism is not about optimization; it is about complete subservience to commercial interests.

Hooton understands this very well so he has set about to alarm the proponent of neoliberalism by pointing out that their true champions are, not at the frontbenches, but at the backbenches of the National Party.

Hooton’s aim is to fan the flames of disunity and discontentment within the National Party by discrediting John Key and highlighting his shortcomings.  He does this by utilizing his insider knowledge and his multiple platforms in the mainstream and social media to promote damaging stories about the Nationals.

This is inverted dirty politics; that is dirty politics turning on itself.

It would be interesting to see if the internal disagreements surrounding the new Health and Safety Reform Bill would bring the disunity within the National Party to the surface.

Whatever the case maybe, it is important to recognize that any internal change amongst the National ranks will be to push the Party further to the right where Hooton and his PR firm will be happy to continue to promote and sell neoliberal policies to the media and the masses.

The latest casualty of blue on blue is Cameron Slater who has been accused of illegal hacking activities by, Ben Rachinger. Ben is a young member of the National Party who, by using trickery and deceit, claims to have obtained damaging information against Slater.

It remains to be seen if Rachinger’s allegations will stand up in court but one thing is for sure; it’s dog eating dog out there. Blue is turning on blue.

Donna Miles is a British-born, Iranian-bred, New Zealand citizen with a strong interest in human rights, justice and equality issues. Mojab worked as a senior mathematics lecturer in the United Kingdom for 10 years before migrating to New Zealand as a new mother and setting up a small business in Christchurch. She is a prolific letter writer to The Press and an active member of Christchurch’s Canterbury for Justice in Palestine.


  1. Very good insight here.

    We wonder what Key’s own “bodyguard” is doing amongst this mix of political intrigue?

    S.Joyce has a need to control the media with the veracity of Joseph Goebbels, (the former 1932 arch expert of Hitler’s Propaganda machine,)

    Surely Joyce MUST undoubtedly want to take over Key’s job also now.

  2. Surprise surprise…soooooo….

    We now have a situation that because English ,….for reasons of political expediency in retaining the semblances of compassion grants beneficiaries an extra $25.00 per week sometime next year as a bulwark against criticism of childhood poverty…

    That Hooten uses this and other ineffectual measures of English’s budget to gain leverage through accusing Key and English of turning all ‘Lefty ‘ – thus bolstering a hoped-for further move to the right by stirring up the disgruntled members of the back benches of the National party.

    Aka the spurned Collins and our sheep /horse trader to Saudi Arabia McCully.

    A two pronged attack by Hooten – the second prong by hopefully suggesting that this latest budget leaves Labour with nowhere to go regards Left policy – because National have already taken that ground.

    The only problem with this ‘ cunning plan ‘ is that it aint that cunning .

    Why ?

    Because its so bleeding obvious what the man is angling for.

    Personal disagreements with Key aside – this is what it boils down to.

    And if Hooten seriously hopes for a bolstering of the neo liberal agenda to be taken up by Labour…with all the talk of a ‘ think tank ‘ on ‘centrist policy ‘- which is actually a euphemism for endorsing and lobbying for more neo liberal policy under the guise of the center vote ,….which in turn really means center to hard right …

    Perhaps that explains the flurry of activity recently by people like Pagnini and Quinn…and some of the hostility as well….in trying to allay Labour party supporters fears of another round of harsh neo liberal measures and further entrenchment of those in Labours caucus that adhere to the neo liberal dogma.

    All too much like a move by stealth by peoples of opposing party’s (supposedly )…and yet who both share the same neo liberal goals….and that are willing to supersede the core ideals of either party to affect those goals.

    And what of the talk of a hypothetical forming of a bloc with National by the Greens ?

    Unthinkable as it may seem…National has some very ‘sick man ‘ one man band party’s to bolster them up with enough seats to remain in power… if the Greens did in fact form a bloc with National….how much would this scare the far right elements of National?

    And it is true that the Greens in some ways have become fashionable among certain of the middle class voters who would vote National normally…but would contribute in taking votes off National…votes they very well may need in 2017.

    I would suggest that if this little ploy by Hooten did bear fruit…the damage to the National party would be colossal…

    Key is their main trump card. Without him…that party would suffer rapid decline.

    Collins has been tarred twice by by alleged scandal -so much so she has been relegated to the back benches.

    Brownlee just does not have the credibility with his blundering ways…Christchurch rebuild for a start…and he is no orator.

    Bridges has proven too inexperienced and blustering. And never comes across as convincing – just parroting a prescribed script that has been designated to him that he must defend at all costs before the media.

    Bennett has proven able – but only so far as the decisions were made for her by those higher up the ladder – and once exposed to account for those decisions seems to lack the ability of discourse to fully explain them. Her only recourse seems to be to adopt a bullheaded attitude that makes it all too easy for her to trip over her own statements.

    Joyce has been for a long time successful as the stand in mouthpiece and fix it man for John Key. Primarily through his contacts through the various media . There was no doubt he was good at it.

    However,…something changed with the Northland by election. It was quite palpable…from the initial bravado and braggadocio of Key stating Winston Peters is too old and doesn’t stand a chance…that arrogance blew up squarely in their faces. The mood changed from overconfidence to one of desperation.

    And as Joyce was the man in charge on the ground…it was a humiliating lesson and defeat. A total trouncing. We really haven’t heard a lot from Joyce since then…but one would suspect he has been busy at work silencing any further criticism of the govt….the demise of Cambell Live comes to mind…

    We have also seen Joyce at his worst….that program when pitted against Grant Robertson demonstrated his capacity for arrogance …and made him look very ridiculous with that excessively high pitched and constant giggling.

    Which leaves English – who has been described as ‘middle of the road’…perhaps as far as neo liberalism goes he may be. But his long term performance indicates otherwise in that he prefers to use stealth rather than rapid movement . And ,…if his budget has raised the ire of those on the impatient far right…will only serve to create deeper rifts within National.

    All in all….it may transpire that Hooten ends up working at cross purposes …no matter which motive he chooses…and that what at first seemed like a viable plan actually turns out to be the very turning of the tide against far right neo liberalism.

Comments are closed.