GUEST BLOG: Sam Oldham – Tony Abbott, John Key: Shared Criminal History

17
9

keyabbott

As John Key and Tony Abbott conclude new agreements around the sharing of criminal records between their two countries, we might take the opportunity to look at the criminal policies of their respective governments, at a time when the sanctity of international law is fresh on the lips of both leaders. John Key recently justified the redeployment of New Zealand forces to Iraq as a commitment to ‘stability and the rule of law internationally’, while Tony Abbott, in his speech to the UN General Assembly late last year, described the United Nations as ‘founded on the principle that we should work together for the common good; and that, over time, talking together and working together will improve our capacity for living together.’ While an ‘imperfect institution’, the UN is ‘better than might-is-right and it gives good arguments the best chance to prevail.’

A month prior to Abbott’s speech, the closest ally of the Australian and New Zealand governments in the Middle East exceeded its own drastic standards of brutality and shocked the world with its slaughter of more than two thousand Palestinians in a few weeks. With diplomatic support from Australia and New Zealand, Israel murdered women and children as they took refuge in UN shelters, or as they fled across deserted beaches to escape; bombed schools, hospitals, homes and workplaces. So flagrant is Israel’s disregard for international law that, in response to the likelihood of processions against Israel through the International Criminal Court (a pillar of international law) for war crimes committed in Gaza, Israeli officials are calling for the dissolution of the Court, and have lobbied ‘friends’ in the international community to discontinue its funding. Among their increasingly few friends: Australia and New Zealand. Israel – which, it is worth emphasizing, is the New Zealand government’s closest ally in the Middle East – has violated more UN General Assembly Resolutions than every other Middle Eastern state combined.

A glance at the Australia-NZ record of response to Israel’s criminality reveals the more glaring contradictions at work in our shared foreign policies. In March 2012, as Israel launched a fresh round of illegal air strikes in Gaza and the West Bank, such was Abbott’s affinity for Israeli terror for that he proclaimed ‘all Australians to be Israelis’. Israel’s settlement project on the West Bank, now the target of EU sanctions, is uncontroversially illegal. Almost. Julie Bishop, Australia’s Foreign Minister and now a contender for the Prime Ministership, last year questioned the illegality of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine, demanding to see ‘which international law declares them illegal.’ Well, Israel’s settlements programme is illegal under the principles of the United Nations Charter, as well as Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention and Article 43 of the Hague Regulations. Of course, none of this is news to Bishop, nor does it matter. Israel – the ‘largest American aircraft carrier in the Middle East’ – is a crucial strategic ally to Australia and violates international law with impunity.

John Key’s record is equally as treacherous. In the aloof manner with which he typically approaches international affairs, Key embarrassed his own government in 2011 by prematurely coming to the defense of the doomed Hosni Mubarak, Egypt’s 30-year dictator, on the grounds that ‘he has done his very best to lead a country which has recognised Israel’. Key, in his farcical ‘guts’ speech, invoked the immolation of a Jordanian pilot by ISIL to justify intervention, yet was slightly more reticent six months ago, when Israeli settlers kidnapped a Palestinian teenager and burnt him alive on the outskirts of Jerusalem. Nor were his much vaunted guts evident in July, as Israel was incinerating unknown numbers of innocent people trapped in their homes in the open air prison of Gaza.

Abbott and Key are equally willing to ignore the United Nations in Pakistan, where CIA drone strikes are conducted with Australian and New Zealand intelligence and diplomatic support. Ben Emmerson, the UN special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, announced last year that CIA drone terror involves ‘the use of force on the territory of another State without its consent and is therefore a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.’ Pakistani government officials consider the campaign ‘to be counter-productive and to be radicalising a whole new generation, and thereby perpetuating the problem of terrorism in the region.’ It is difficult to see how the destabilisation of Pakistan, a nuclear-armed state, fits with John Key’s commitment to ‘stability’ in international affairs. Equally, Abbott’s comments to the UN that ISIL uses ‘the most sophisticated technology’ (such as Twitter) in its recruitment campaigns are a little hard to swallow given his complicity in the use of what is in fact the most sophisticated military technology on earth against innocent people.

CIA drone strikes have killed unknown hundreds of innocent Pakistanis, perhaps thousands; the United States keeps no records, though reports by independent agencies provide estimates and a picture of the nature of the strikes. A 2013 Amnesty International report detailed the targeting of a 68-year-old woman ‘gathering vegetables in her family fields’ who was ‘blown to pieces’ in front of her grandchildren, and the targeting of eighteen labourers, many of whom were killed in a second strike as they helped the wounded after an initial strike. Little wonder that Amnesty is ‘seriously concerned’ that CIA drone strikes, representing a violation of territorial sovereignty, also ‘may constitute extrajudicial killings or war crimes.’ Children suffer enormously where drones are most active in Northwestern Pakistan, suffering severe psychological trauma, believing that at any moment a drone could kill them. CIA Predator drones are active in Somalia, Yemen and elsewhere, in every case without UN sanction, yet the CIA will respond to no criminal allegations regarding its activities. John Key, short of screaming about guts in Parliament, quietly provides diplomatic support (refusing to confirm whether intelligence gathered by NZ agencies supplied to ISAF is used for drone strikes specifically) for the secret crimes of the United States.

If terrorising children is a mark of guts, Abbott certainly gets double points. In the squalid refugee camps where Australia’s unpeople dwell, children routinely attempt suicide and self-harm. Reports of young children, indefinitely detained, driving sharp sticks into their ears and sewing their own lips shut are among the more horrifying examples. Much of Australia’s asylum seeker apparatus – euphemistically called the PNG ‘Solution’ – is in breach of international law. In 2013, the UN Human Rights Committee charged the Australian Government with 143 serious violations of international law at its detention centres. Abbott uses sexual violence perpetrated by ISIL as a justification for illegal military intervention. Under Tony Abbott, women and vulnerable people who seek asylum in Australia will be illegally resettled in PNG, which has one of the highest rates of sexual violence in the world, where one in two women report having been raped. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees slammed the Abbott Government for the evident ‘protection issues’ associated with its criminal policies.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

As if to coincide with Key’s announcement, the past speaking to the present, Somali terrorist group al Shabaab made veiled threats to attack Westfield shopping malls in the West. Al Shabaab is itself a product of the kind of illegal military intervention to which New Zealand is now committed. In 2006, the Islamic Courts Union of Somalia – a moderate Islamic government with popular support – established stability in the country for the first time since the civil war of the early 1990s. In doing so, the Courts expelled CIA-backed warlords, crucial to American geostrategy in the region, and were quickly removed from power through US-backed aggression (Ethiopian invasion). Somalia returned to chaos; al Shabaab quickly took advantage. In the words of regional expert Jeremy Scahill, ‘al-Shabab was largely a non-player in Somalia, and al-Qaeda had almost no presence there. The United States, by backing warlords and overthrowing the Islamic Courts Union, made the very force they claimed to be trying to fight.’ To have a slightly longer memory, many of the weapons now used by al Shabaab (to massacre 67 people in a Kenyan shopping mall, for example) were imported into Somalia by the United States under the regime of Mohamed Siad Barre, whose dictatorship the West supported for two decades, until it collapsed in 1991 under the weight of its own atrocities.

Of course, Islamic State, over the course of the same two decades, emerged in virtually the same circumstances. Saddam’s 1990-91 invasion of Kuwait began the systematic destruction of Iraq by Western governments, led by the US, first through the monstrous sanctions of the 1990s, then the invasion of 2003 – a textbook act of aggression, the ‘supreme international crime’ as determined at Nuremberg – where John Key lamented New Zealand was ‘missing in action’, and which Tony Abbott defended on the grounds that ‘it is not UN sanction that determines an armed intervention’s moral quality’ (see Robert Manne’s book Making Trouble). Again, international law begs to differ. John Key frequently uses the word ‘barbarian’ in reference to ISIS. Interestingly, Iraqis today liken the 2003 invasion of their country directly to the mongol incursions of the 13th Century. As evidence of the true source of Iraq’s contemporary barbarity, the country experienced its first suicide attack since the 13th Century in 2003, a few weeks after invasion. Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) revived suicide attacks in the country and over the course of the following decade would become the group we know now as Islamic State.

In the present era, our leaders invoke international law to justify their own violations of it. John Key’s ‘guts’ speech was completely fraudulent; his mock concern for victims of terror, a repulsive pretence. Alongside Tony Abbott, Key is a criminal in his own right. An honest discussion about the real threat of terror in the world must begin with a recognition that terror unleashed by Western governments, always in pursuit of narrow strategic and economic gain, creates the conditions necessary for groups like Islamic State, al Qaeda, al Shabaab and others to exist. Adherence to international law – through ratification of the use of force by the UN Security Council, for example – should be a basic expectation in international affairs and, even where these conditions are met, should be a condition of the legitimacy of intervention, not a guarantee. Every act of aggression between states, not least including, at one time, Hitler’s invasion of Eastern Europe, tends to be justified by the aggressor on grounds of humanitarianism, democracy, ‘nation building’, or some other empty platitude to international good. The use of force without UN sanction constitutes an act of aggression, the ‘supreme international crime’, for which Nazi planners were hung at Nuremberg. In the absence of organised, popular opposition to the criminal policies of our governments, it is the status quo.

 

 

Bio: Sam Oldham writes for academic and popular publications. He has been a member of trade unions and libertarian socialist groups in both Auckland and Melbourne, and is presently a member of the Post Primary Teachers’ Association and is a member of the Aotearoa Workers Solidarity Movement.

17 COMMENTS

  1. Let’s not forget their tacit support for the on-going genocide in West Papua as they both suck up to Indonesia and say nothing about that.

  2. Great article.

    Towards the end of the film Citizen Four (according to a different source, not Snowden) it’s implied that every drone strike goes straight to the POTUS for approval.

    It’s a surreal, almost post-modern time when Obama is, at the same time, a peace prize winner and also one of the greatest war criminals of recent times.

    • Ha ha ….imagine this article on the front page of the Herald!….wish upon a star…even then blissfully ignorant wouldn’t,t get it!!

      When asked by a family member what I was doing today…I replied going to square after lunch… another TPPA protest is happening across the country ….’the what’?, she scowls. …that is the sort of ignorance we are up against .a nat supporter whom I cannot discuss anything that remotely critisizes the staus quo without getting into a screaming match!! Ha ha …you can love your family but don,t have to like them….sigh

  3. Yeah well this is what you get when Big Al and Buggsy get together – more corruption and theft.

    How can it be otherwise when both belong to same family of neo liberal thugs and gangsters ?

    What does one expect when the family is an international affair and is currently in the process of setting up a global crime syndicate?

    That’s right , – more of the same.

    And what else do we expect when this global crime syndicate :

    Murders , money launders , deals in arms , practices selective genocide , rigs trade deals , practices deliberate disenfranchisement of populations , commits treason , practices perjury , misdirects and siphons off taxpayer dollars into their trusts and bank accounts , evades justice by perverting the spirit of the law with half truths and straight out lies , covers up investigations , pays off spin doctors to lie to the public for them , and so on and so on…..

    Hell !!! …….Dunno about you lot ,- but that SURE seems like ONE HELL of a crime syndicate to me !!!

  4. The irony that the only one who needs to grow some guts is Key, and face up to his golf buddy Obama saying we’re out. But no, best to accuse others of cowardice…

  5. Qatar is the US’s aircraft carrier in the Middle East, not Israel. The USA is an ally of Israel, but Israel is not an ally of the USA, a peculiar situation.

    Pretty good article otherwise though, as far as I can tell. I hope you write more here.

      • Rothschild/Rockefeller/UN/Israel. . . (irrelevant) non hint.

        Anyway. Think you may have been a tad harsh and didn’t really address the point, not being antagonistic though.

      • I agree; this was a really good blog. If the 52% who support going to war in Iraq, knew all the information contained in this article, support for the war would drop to a trickle. But the MSM wont print such articles, so the average Joe Blows, in their blind ignorance, support blatant terrorism. What hope is there for this world?

        • I doubt 52% support the war. Where is that from? I tried to vote against the war on the Herald poll but it would not take my vote. HMMM poor technology or just more dirty politics?

          Either way never believe anything you read about in the herald. Lucky MSM are so blatant, more and more readers are ditching them.

  6. These two dim lights plus obama etc. . . . are puppets for a much higher plan that has been entrenched on our world culture for a very long time. Google –
    “Agenda 21” and also hear the many good interviews with ROSA KOIRE.
    Want to know where the term “conspiracy theory” was coined and by whom and what for – google – Tavistock Institute. They coined that word as well as many others to manipulate the masses. To also discredit those who oppose their brainwashing attempts and plans all under a phony altruistic mask front hiding their ugly truths. As we look deeper :

    http://www.educate-yourself.org

  7. These are just Criminal gangs that attend the following, to learn their trade,

    subject; we need scrutiny as to why PM John Key attended a secretive powerful global black ops group Bilderberg Group without informing the NZ taxpayer.

    No Bilderberg meeting agenda has ever been made public. “It is the epitome of low-profile dark ops, a shadow government hidden in a doorway.” According to critics and close observers, it’s agenda is to weaken all world leadership but their own. It is also, according to a U.S. law called the Logan Act, [15] illegal:

    http://twochurchesonly.com/supmat/03/most_influential/bilderberg_group/list_of_bilderberg_attendees.pdf

    On behalf of all NZ taxpayers, we ask someone’s assistance to investigate this connection between a secretive global power hungry group and answers from PM John Key the following;

    Why PM failed to tell us that he attended the Bilderberg Group as PM of NZ in 2011.

    Why did not prior, inform us why he attended this most secretive powerful global elitist black ops organisation who plots to destabilise secretly sovereign countries around the world.

    Is he being requested by Bilderberg or any other party to spy on our country and others for their information?

    Why has he attended an highly secretive organisation who bans any media coverage of events?

    Our belief;

    We believe the global elite is causing all this degradation of our world “so called order”.

    The capitalistic system is failing and these Bilderberg NAZI regenerated agenda plotters have invited Key to their 2011 annual conference so he is in it Don-key deep.

    (We have the full attendance list.) http://twochurchesonly.com/supmat/03/most_influential/bilderberg_group/list_of_bilderberg_attendees.pdf

    Why didn’t PM John Key tell NZ he was into Bilderberg?

    List of Bilderberg participants 4

    New Zealand

    • John Key (2011-2012), Prime Minister of New Zealand

    http://twochurchesonly.com/supmat/03/most_influential/bilderberg_group/list_of_bilderberg_attendees.pdf

    According to this site it quotes; http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bilderberg

    No Bilderberg meeting agenda has ever been made public. “It is the epitome of low-profile dark ops, a shadow government hidden in a doorway.” According to critics and close observers, it’s agenda is to weaken all world leadership but their own. It is also, according to a U.S. law called the Logan Act, [15] illegal:

    Tucker, an American libertarian and journalist, has been a critic of the Bilderberg group for decades. A few days before the 2006 meeting, he wrote:

    “When meeting last year in Rottach-Egern, Germany, Bilderberg called for dramatic increases in the price of oil. Oil prices started climbing immediately from $40 a barrel to $70.”

    According to Mr. Tucker, the group uses its influence to organize wars to overthrow “unfriendly” leaders. The Bilderbergers have also been accused of backing campaigns of politicians friendly to big business interests. Former U.S. president Bill Clinton spoke at a Bilderberg conference a year before his election victory, as did British Prime Minister Tony Blair. According to the current chairman, Belgian politician and businessman Etienne Davignon, the steering committee that organizes the annual meetings is “excellent at spotting talent.” It would seem so. Former prime ministers Paul Martin, Jean Chretien and Pierre Trudeau, all attended Bilderberg conferences. Prime Minister Stephen Harper attended the 2003 Bilderberg conference in Versailles, France, while he was Opposition leader. However, the Bilderbergers were not pleased with Harper because of the Kyoto Protocol, which they were backing. The group also pushed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTA). See also David Rockefeller.

    According to Mr. Tucker, they also “turned NATO into the UN’s standing army. It’s a step on the road to creating world government.” [12]

    The Logan Act
    This super-powerful world organization runs out of an 18m2 (194 square feet) office, staffed by one person. It uses one one telephone line and a single fax number. There is no web page or name plate on the door. The independent press have never been allowed access and no statements have ever been released on the attendees’ conclusions. No Bilderberg meeting agenda has ever been made public. “It is the epitome of low-profile dark ops, a shadow government hidden in a doorway.” According to critics and close observers, it’s agenda is to weaken all world leadership but their own. It is also, according to a U.S. law called the Logan Act, [15] illegal:

    “A US law, called the Logan Act, states explicitly that it is against the law for federal officials to attend secret meetings with private citizens to develop public policies. Although Bilderberg 2005 was missing one of its luminaries, US State Department official John Bolton who was testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the American government was well represented in Rottach-Egern by Alan Hubbard, assistant to the president for economic policy and director of the National Economic Council; William Luti, deputy under secretary of defense; James Wolfensohn, outgoing president of the World Bank and Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of state, an ideologue of the Iraq War and incoming president of the World Bank. By attending Bilderberg 2005 meeting, these people are breaking federal laws of the United States.”[16]

    See also Infiltrating Bilderberg 2005 by Daniel Estulin in Counterpunch. [17]

  8. Anyone who talks about ‘processing people’ in the way that Abbott does re: Manus Island/Nauru (I thought one could only process fish) is not going to offer anything enlightening in their foreign policy. NZ remains dangerously ignorant of our own foreign policy of being part of an unquestioned but demanding ‘club.’Great article Sam. Tag your Swag.
    N.

Comments are closed.