Social media and indecency

By   /   May 12, 2014  /   9 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

Social media use can bring out the most unpleasant human dispositions; betrayal, voyeurism, puritanism, hypocrisy and sadism. All of these traits were on display during the leaked video `scandal` involving Konrad Hurrell and Teuila Blakely.

1399496931501.jpg-620x349
Social media use can bring out the most unpleasant human dispositions; betrayal, voyeurism, puritanism, hypocrisy and sadism. All of these traits were on display during the leaked video `scandal` involving Konrad Hurrell and Teuila Blakely.

Clearly, whoever was entrusted with the original footage has betrayed Konrad and Teuila, that person knows who they are. When a private clip goes `viral` ever expanding ripples of voyeurism are created. We have early viewers and transmitters of the footage, engaged observers of the unfolding story on smartphones, Twitter, Facebook and multiple websites, television current affairs hosts, talk back hosts, newspaper columnists, fascinated viewers, listeners and readers and so on. Each breaking development and news angle gives the story a prurience which it did not originally possess.

There have, nevertheless, been some thoughtful observations. Kerre McIvor in a May 11 Sunday Herald piece entitled `Smartphones kill privacy` stated `boy am I glad I had my fun before cellphones were ubiquitous`. At the Catholic school she attended desirous teenagers could easily dismiss the threat that `God would be watching`. Kerre admitted that, `if the nuns had told us that everything we said and did could be recorded at any time and shared to the world, I would have been a lot more circumspect`. If this is the case now, then a new puritanism has arrived.

The `holier than thou` brigade wag their fingers at naughty videos as liberal, well adjusted youngsters live in fear that they will be dobbed in by the puritans among their peers.

Puritanism is the begetter of hypocrisy, as our leaked video story clearly indicates. In Rachel Glucina`s NZ Herald opinion column `The Diary: star tells of backlash over leaked video` Teuila recounts the loss of a major sponsorship deal with a major brand. Apparently they said `on a personal level we love and support you and we`ve had a great relationship with you`. Teuila regards this as sad because `for them it’s a moral issue`. For me, what is sad here is the hypocrisy of the sponsor. They state their support and do exactly the opposite. For them this a commercial not a moral evaluation, can`t have a leaked video of our client tainting the brand .

And what are we to make of the NRL integrity board? Konrad cops a $5000 dollar fine for embarrassing an organisation that has, in the past, tacitly condoned the drunken, rapacious escapades of `Mad Monday` (a historic rite of passage for NRL professionals). And then we have the silent sadistic abusers who troll the net for celebrity victims. Disgusting of course, yet demonising these people exclusively, deflects our attention from those who are merely prurient.

There are some lessons to be drawn from this sorry tale. First, there is an iron law which rules the social media world; the growing capacity for 24/7 communication entails an equal capacity for 24/7 surveillance. In this case the surveillance is social, some of us have internalised the all seeing `big brother` mentality which pervades our security agencies. To the extent that this is true the boundary between private and public life is disappearing. Second, these disturbing tendencies need to recognised and studied in our educational institutions. The combination of teenage jealousy, bullying and constant real time transmission of text and video is, potentially, emotional and social dynamite.

Here, the `selfies` phenomenon deserves special mention. The concept of narcissism should be explored in the junior highschool social studies curriculum. A good starting point would be the Greek legend of Narcissus accompanied by a visual of Dali`s famous painting. These matters need to be considered early in life, it shouldn`t be the responsibility of an adult rugby league club. The final lesson is this. When consensual sexual encounters that are caught on video go `viral` it is not the participants who are being indecent. Rather, it is the betrayers, voyeurs, puritans and hypocrites who feed off the situation for their own purposes.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

9 Comments

  1. countryboy says:

    Great Post Prof’ Wayne Hope . Ya know ? I just couldn’t get greasy Cameron Slater out of my ‘ begging for mercy ‘ mind as I read it . And all those who gag for the indecency of his blog . New Zealands most popular Blog ? God help us .

  2. Jpotgirls says:

    I’d never heard of either of these ‘stars’ before. When I see their pics side by side, they look like a cute couple, I have no desire to see more. It seems he was just ‘showing off’ for his ‘mates’, though he must be very dumb if he thought it wouldn’t go public.
    Assuming she’d seen the camera, she must have known he was being a ‘lad’ and it would be shown to others. Like other ‘released’ sex tapes, it is all just attention seeking behaviour by (what I guess are) mediocre NZ celebs. Well done Teuila for scoring a young hunk! (is that the point?).

  3. Barry says:

    Wayne – you are pulling my leg – surely.

    Why the news media and hangers on (like you) take any notice of these halfwits I dont know. Everyone seems to suddenly find that they are all upset when these sorts of things come to the surface.

    And why anyone is surprised that these morons do this sort of thing is beyond me. They are pretty much brain damaged halfwits and are likely to do anything.

    If there is any lesson, maybe we need to have responsibility test before people can buy a phone or a camera…………

  4. Marc says:

    “Clearly, whoever was entrusted with the original footage has betrayed Konrad and Teuila, that person knows who they are. When a private clip goes `viral` ever expanding ripples of voyeurism are created.”

    Who the hell recorded it in the first place, and who else but the “participants” knew, so what is this empty argument supposed to say?

    I think that fools like this deserve to suffer the embarrassment, as I see it. It is total stupidity, or arrogance or whatever else, to let yourself be video taped and then loaded onto You Tube or Facebook.

    NO sympathy, NO pity, suffer your humiliation, idiots. Privacy is important, but when just one party cannot be trusted, and betrays what happened in “private’, better sort out the persons you associate with.

    I have NO sympathy for either, and they deserve the embarrassment they are getting. They have been plain stupid, to put it mildly.

  5. Guesting says:

    If you want to know the harshness of social media, look at how China has it.

  6. Tom says:

    If you have any brains, the following rules are worth sticking too.

    1. Never ever take pictures or allow pictures to be taken of yourself naked, your genitals, or yourself having sexual intercourse or engaging in any other sort of sex act.

    2. Don’t demand that anyone else does the same as a relationship condition.

    To be sure, this won’t protect you 100% of the time, but neither do condoms.

    You would have to be weapons grade stupid to take such pictures of yourself these days.

    • Heather G says:

      Oh no. That’s a bit harsh. I am very glad I have some record of how hot my body was when I was younger. Luckily it’s all safely tucked away.

      • Tom says:

        Lock it up, and if you’re female, keep nothing on your hard drive in case you have to take your computer for repair. The techs apparently love to scan the hard drives of attractive women looking for such pictures.

  7. raegun says:

    And NO-ONE mentioned how the act itself constituted dangerous driving.