Unions Respond to Review of Retirement Income

1
0
Source: CTU – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Unions Respond to Review of Retirement Income

Printer-friendly version

Unions have responded today to the release of the draft Review of Retirement Income Policy.

Peter Conway, CTU Secretary, says that “it is in all of our interests to ensure that we have a sustainable policy to support decent retirement incomes”.

“The recommendations that lift the age of entitlement to NZ Superannuation over a long period and change the indexation method will raise concerns among workers about the adequacy of retirement income even though measures have been included to address those most adversely affected”, said Peter Conway.

“The proposal to dilute the indexation to the average wage runs a severe risk of reducing the value of NZ Super payments over time”.

“However”, he said, “unions will support the recommendations that the Government take on KiwiSaver contributions for workers on paid parental leave and that proposals are developed with unions and employers to support older workers”.

The CTU supports maintaining NZ Super in the current format, lifting the top tax rate to generate additional income, and boosting the level of employer contributions to KiwiSaver to 6 percent phased in over 3 years.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Peter Conway said that there is mounting concern that the combined effect of low wages, insecure work, falling levels of home ownership, and high levels of personal debt will make it very difficult for people to save and plan for a reasonable standard of living in retirement.
 

The claims and opinions made in this statement are those of the release organisation and are not necessarily endorsed by, and are not necessarily those of, The Daily Blog. Also in no event shall The Daily Blog be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the above release content.

1 COMMENT

  1. I agree re Not raising the age for Super BUT on other hand there are those receiving Super AND still working ..

    That is the problem I have with Super not age

Comments are closed.