Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Bloggers  >  Gareth Renowden  >  Current Article

Living off our natural capital, or the end of the world as we know it is nigh

By   /  August 22, 2013  /  6 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

The result of this continued growth in our use and abuse of the planet’s natural systems is that we now need one and a half planets to keep us in the style to which we have become accustomed.

    Print       Email

The only planet around here of any use to us…

August 20th was Earth Overshoot Day — the day in the year when we stopped living on what the earth’s natural systems can produce in a year and started eating up natural capital. From now to the end of the year, we’ll be living beyond our ecological means, beyond the planet’s physical and biological limits. What we use up over the next four months will not regenerate or recover in time to get us out of trouble for 2014.

This year’s Earth Overshoot Day, calculated by the Global Footprint Network, has arrived two days earlier than last year, indicating that our appetite for natural resources continues to increase. Ten years ago, Overshoot Day arrived a month later, on September 22. In 1993, it was October 21. The result of this continued growth in our use and abuse of the planet’s natural systems is that we now need one and a half planets to keep us in the style to which we have become accustomed.

Where’s that half a planet going to come from? Last time I checked images of the earth from space, or poked around in maps of the solar system, there was no sign of another planet with comparable resources anywhere around. There might be one within a few tens of light years of our solar system, but we haven’t yet invented the means of getting there and returning stuff to earth at the sort of speeds that would be of any real help. One day, humanity may spread to the stars and the days of resource limitation will be over, but until that day comes — and there’s no sign of it outside the pages of science fiction — we really have no option but to find ways to live within our means.

Climate change is just one symptom of this problem. It’s the largest, most obvious, and the only one with a relatively simple cure: decarbonise the word’s energy systems. We know how to do that. There’s no need to invoke science fiction solutions or wave a magic wand — everything we need to know to take effective action is already in the public domain. All we need is the political will. Sadly, there’s no sign of that from the present New Zealand government, content as it is to don a five percent fig leaf while mining the hell out of our natural resources.

Dealing with climate change will cut our ecological overshoot significantly because it will reduce the stress we’re putting on planetary waste disposal mechanisms, but it won’t be enough to overcome resource depletion. To do that, we have to learn to manage natural resources so that they are at least maintained at current levels — or preferably, restored to former levels of production. And at the root of that is one basic issue: global equity.

It simply isn’t possible for everyone alive in the world today to live like the average New Zealander. There isn’t enough of anything to allow seven billion people to live like we do — with cars, big houses, gardens, pubs and restaurants, trains and boats and planes. And therein lies one of the really big questions we all have to answer: how do we share out the planet?

Politics is how we solve that problem, if we don’t want the solution forced on us in a torrent of climate change impacts, ecosystem collapses and wars over scarce resources. One answer is already on the table, and being enacted under the guise of sound economic policy around much of the developed world. That is to concentrate the world’s wealth into the hands of a very few billionaires and their bankers and political friends, and to watch as they pull up the drawbridge and retire into their heavily fortified keeps to fight off the barbarian hordes of people who have finally noticed that wealth never trickles down, and that a rising tide only lifts the superyachts.

The alternative — the only thing of any relevance to 99.99 percent of the global population — involves equitable sharing of resources and finding ways for everyone, all seven billion of us, to live fulfilling lives that are not defined by overconsumption. And that’s a really hard problem, because while our politicians are focussed on ekeing out yet more economic growth from a planet that can’t take any more, we’re heading in exactly the wrong direction.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***
    Print       Email

6 Comments

  1. David says:

    Yes, this is true and yet the average person sees it not and instead focusses on short term gains and escape into addiction. My sense is that humanity will destroy itself, and the planet in response will help that end with an increase in disasters hence my writing the doomsday book Zealandia Rising and the new civilisation growing from that.

    • fambo says:

      As a physical outlier of human society due to its location, New Zealand will inevitably be the seed for regrowth following any global catastrophy caused by mankind. This is one of the reasons why the fight for New Zealand’s soul which is currently going on is so significant. The sort of society New Zealand has, if it does become a “Noah’s Ark”, will have a huge bearing on how it deals with such a catastrophe and the sort of society that emerges following.

  2. Save the planet says:

    Seven billion people is the problem. Why is everyone having kids willy nilly? Hardly any parents are protesting the destruction of the planet and I’d expect them to protest the most for the future of their kids. I find it totally selfish people apathetically breeding and consuming without a second thought to the planet. Lucy Lawless needs a medal for her protesting I wish more mothers would do what she does. Or stop having kids, the world is full of humans we don’t need everyone’s gene pool to continue. Adopt an endangered animal in stead.

  3. […] out of the very thing we value most, as I explore in my column at The Daily Blog this week — Living off our natural capital, or the end of the world as we know it is nigh. Comments over there, […]

  4. Kiwiiano says:

    “…and to watch as they pull up the drawbridge and retire into their heavily fortified keeps to fight off the barbarian hordes…”

    The Aviator notwithstanding, I wonder when it will dawn on the 1%ers that their privileged lifestyle* is utterly dependent on the vast global infrastructure of industry, commerce and cheap energy. Their manicured lawns will depend on mowers, which need spark plugs, which are made from steel that comes from huge factories that need electricity that comes from dams on wires spanning half a nation that are maintained by workers who buy their lunch from a grocer who gets the bread from a baker who buys the flour from a farmer etc etc etc. Our inverted pyramid is dramatically unstable, remarkably small dislocations could bring everything crashing down. In the end you can’t eat money.

    *all our lifestyles actually. If you consider what you can make, from scratch, with no external inputs, you’ll find yourself limited to woven wool or flax-linen garments and fired clay pots. Any other suggestions?

  5. Terry Mock says:

    Gareth is right:

    “The result of this continued growth in our use and abuse of the planet’s natural systems is that we now need one and a half planets to keep us in the style to which we have become accustomed.”

    It’s hardly news that after decades of talk about the need for sustainable development, we humans continue to have a poor track record when it comes to achieving sustainable results. How can we implement change while up against the overwhelming current of business as usual? It will take a new perspective, new approaches and different means of leadership. http://www.triplepundit.com/2011/02/fractal-frontier/

    Sustainable Land Development Initiative

You might also like...

What do the Banks need to do in New Zealand before regulation?

Read More →