National Standards: Vapours, Hot Air and Coercion

5
9

John Key is adamant that there isn’t much resistance to National Standards any more, saying that last year “there were about 300 non-complying schools, this year it’s only 13.”  He trumpets that “resistance to National Standards is evaporating.”

As one observer noted “How can there be [resistance]?  The govt has the ability to overide schools with the strong arm of the law – schools at the end of the day have no choice.”

Because what Mr Key  doesn’t tell you in his sound-bite is that schools have all along been, at best, coerced to comply, and at worst, threatened with reprisals by the Ministry of Education if they do not comply with National Standards.

That is why many have had to back down.

Not approval or acceptance, but bullying and fear.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Do As I Say, Or Else

Pembroke School has been on the receiving end of the Ministry’s dubious and underhand methods.

Remember when Tomorrow’s Schools were brought in and David Lange promised “more parental and community involvement” to meet local conditions?  Well the locally elected community school board at Pembroke decided to opt out of National Standards.  They considered the issues, and with a large proportion of students who have English as a second language, they felt the standards would be harmful for their students and community.

No batonsThe Ministry disagreed.  Instead it insisted Pembroke’s board have a “compliant charter” including National Standards, complaining that the “board has shown a lack of willingness to meet the requirements of National Standards”.

In other words, the school was forbidden to resist. Forbidden to have a choice. Forbidden to opt out.

And what did the Ministry do to Pembroke, to prove its point?  After months of planning a multi-school fono that was to be hosted at there – a fono that was to look at Pasifika eduction, including national standards – the Ministry pulled the event from Pembroke’s site, telling the board that it “could no longer work with Pembroke School because [they] weren’t following the rules”.   As Principal, Brent Godfrey says “not working with our school in the interest of our Pacific students – one of the identified areas of concern – is pathetic.”

Does it sound to you that Pembroke’s resistance evaporated?  No, me neither.  It’s bulling, plain and simple.

And that, Mr Key, that is nothing to trumpet about.

Big Brother Ministry

Is Pembroke the only school in this kind of situation?  Is it hell.

noGo and ask Balmoral School, in Auckland.

Or Freeville School.

Or try Waikanae School where 66% of respondents to their survey said that when it came to action against National Standards, low level action was supported by 78%, and high level action with high level consequences was supported by 13%.

Many of the comments in response to the survey said they would have chosen a stronger level of action but feared the board and/or principal would suffer the consequences.

Waikanae’s board says it is  “concerned about the requirement to send school level OTJ [overall teacher judgement] data to the Ministry of Education” and so chose to report against National Standards but in a format that was not easily turned into league tables. (It will be interesting to see how Waikanae School and others will deal with the brewing PaCT saga, but that’s for another time.)

Not enough for you?  You could also ask Tamariki School in Christchuch.

Or why not give Moerewa School a call.

And what about the rest of the 30 schools found refusing any kind of national standards reporting last year?

Resistance is not evaporating; Bullying is forcing compliance

Principals and parents have been speaking out about National Standards all along.

Kelvin Smythe has warned that “National standards pose a stark moral challenge to all those involved in primary education,” and in a recent conversation with me he observed quite rightly that:

“Hundreds of schools were bullied and compelled.
And there were so may ways schools expressed their hold out.
And they gave way at a lot of stages.”

When dialogue is shut down and voices silenced, we have to wonder what the Ministry have to fear?

One thing’s for sure, the hot air wafting around this issue is coming directly from the Ministry and Mr Key, and resistance is not evaporating at all.

Resistance being hit with a force fan on super hot and told to begone.

 

 

5 COMMENTS

  1. I am a newly elected board member of a school that is complying to national standards. What can I do to get the school to consider not using national standards? I complained last year when my then seven year olds teacher read out the names of all children who had reached standard in her class as a way of motivating her students to work harder! My very bright kid came home upset and saying he couldn’t go to university now!!

    • This is just more proof the system is working! We want a dog eat dog system so kids can learn what the REAL world is all about. We want winners and losers.
      I don’t know how we can get good teachers – you know good teachers who can torture children while having the the kids and their parents think that it’s good for them.
      All the wisdom and rhetoric about the vital element being putting the best people in front of kids and expecting those with intelligence, creativity, wit and humanity to take the job up. To make the Parata system work only unquestioning subservient cretins and paint-by-numbers clods need apply.

  2. Great article again Dianne!
    As you know I am constantly disappointed and amazed at the total lack of investigative questioning from the mainstream media of national standards, charter schools and reform policy in general.
    Is it because a lot of these journalists don’t have children in the education system (either too young or too old?) or is it because their paymasters really love the reform movement? Or is it because the mainstream media is so under the hammer with deadlines and the like that they just don’t have time to think in between getting their soundbite of John Key and tweeting it to their 173 followers?
    Either way… we are on the cusp. If the 2014 election is fought on education we could be in for a doozy.
    Mike

    • The 2014 election will not be fought on education, that will be a mere sideline issue. Overall credibility and trust will be the main thing for people and most people think John Key is excellent.

      Many people are so thick they do not understand the reforms (agree Mike about investigative and agenda free journalism) and have been sucked in while this Government’s has trashed education. The middle class desperation and paranoia about schooling is John Keys’s “reds under the bed.”
      Others with a right wing agenda for education will continue to only believe in total privatisation of education and will support Key.

Comments are closed.