The GCSB is the enemy, not our protector

14
2

WaihopaiGCSB has contempt for New Zealanders.

If he has nothing else John Key has nerve.

In answer to a parliamentary question yesterday about what role the GCSB (Government Communications Security Bureau) had in the PRISM project run by the GCSB’s parent organization, the US National Security Agency, the Prime Minister didn’t bat an eyelid. He said the GCSB has assured him our spies work within the law and neither do they use their relationship with other agencies to circumvent the law.

After the GCSB was outed just a couple of months ago breaking the law in precisely that manner Key’s parliamentary assurances were as audacious as they were unbelievable.

The revelations about the massive secret American surveillance project called PRISM by whistleblower Edward Snowden are extremely serious. PRISM requires America’s major communications companies to pass on data about users – including email, photos, videos, chat services, file transfers, stored data, log-ins and video conferencing.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

In theory the US does not collect this data on its own citizens but in practice it would behave the same as the GCSB. But in any case data on all New Zealanders is now in the hands of the NSA and to some extent at least is available to the GCSB via the back door.

For spies who work in unaccountable secrecy laws are there to be broken or circumvented – “in the national interest” of course.

We should celebrate Edward Snowden as a hero (unlike John Key who referred to him as a criminal on TV yesterday morning). He’s a great reminder that the human spirit is not always broken by big state bullying or heavy bureaucratic threats.

For New Zealand the most encouraging aspect of the whole GCSB antics this last year has been polls showing the public don’t trust the organisation and on this basis alone the media and politicians have a duty to pursue the organisation and the Prime Minister relentlessly for more information.

Labour’s always been soft in this area so it’s been good to see David Shearer continue to call for an inquiry into our spy agencies. Helen Clark was even less forthcoming that John Key and the illegal GCSB spying was going on on her watch as Minister in charge of Intelligence and Security.

However one looks at it we deserve better than Key’s rehearsed lines yesterday. The greater an organisation’s power and secrecy then the greater must be its public and political accountability. We have neither.

To emphasise this point a couple of weeks back I received a pitiful letter from the GCSB in response to a request for information held about me by the agency after revelations in the Kittridge report that the GCSB had illegally spied on at least 88 New Zealanders in the past decade. The letter is with this blog.
The GCSB head, John Key’s school buddy Ian Fletcher, says he conducted a thorough search but “can neither confirm nor deny the existence or non-existence of the information requested”. Others who have made similar requests have received similar responses.

What contempt this organization has for New Zealanders.

scan 2065

14 COMMENTS

  1. Edward Snowden is an incredibly brave person, as is Bradley Mannering. Both are maintaining so much dignity in circumstances in which most of us would find unbearable. John Key is at the other end of the spectrum

  2. I hope you, and anyone else that receives a reply such as this (the scanned letter) from Ian Fletcher, pursue it with the Privacy Commissioner and any other avenues open to you. Their arrogance and attitude that they are above the law demands it.

  3. “…said the GCSB has assured him our spies work within the law and neither do they use their relationship with other agencies to circumvent the law.”

    Buggered if I know why I should believe a single word that dribbles from his mouth…

  4. Seems Prism doesn’t have a LOT (i.e. nothing) to do with terrorism either:
    http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2013/06/10/NSA-map-shows-Germany-most-spied-on-of-EU-members/UPI-21541370893919/

    Now looking at that map, what do we see? Seems Prism is primarily focussed on areas of ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, as opposed to terrorism. The oil rich nations (but NOT Muslim countries in general), Germany, China, India. What international terrorism is coming out of Germany and China exactly? This looks like a system designed and aimed at corporate espionage more than anything relating to terrorism. Obama is shaping up to be a far, far more evil, pro big business President than George W. ever was. He is the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing. The United States has never been less transparent than it is now.

    • I’m speculating, but, the targeting of countries such as Germany, India etc I believe are about ensuring American imperial dominance. These countries are the most capable in terms of challenging Americas current position as sole super power. Remember Germany still has American military bases from world war 2! Why? Well after world war 2 it seems that military And political dominance was traded for the ability to compete economically with the U.S. Problem is the economic base which supported U.S dominance has been eroded, ironically by countries who could funnel all their money into economic competition rather than unproductive military spending. opening up the potential to compete with the U.S in these arenas once more.

      Here’s an excellent blog on American/German/Chinese competition after world war 2
      http://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/responses-to-readers-austrian-economics-versus-marxism/the-american-empire-and-the-evolution-of-the-international-monetary-system/

  5. Key has shat all over the rights of The NZ people and ruined or removed any form of humane legislation the only organised crime family act he hasn’t committed is ordering hits on his competitors and even that I’m not sure about

  6. Labour calls for an inquiry, perhaps it’s time for Mana to call for the dismantling of secret services, in the interest of democracy and transparency. After all they have damaged our freedoms more than their fictional terrorism.
    Plus what citizen can vote in confidence if the actions of their representatives are hidden from them?

Comments are closed.