Len Brown should hang his head in shame


pokiesThe deal for construction of a National Convention Centre is a national disgrace.

It was always going to be a grubby, unprincipled agreement. From the day Prime Minister John Key had dinner with Skycity executives and cut out the others interested in building a convention centre for New Zealand the path to moral decrepitude was laid out.

And when the final outcome was announced on Monday it was worse than expected.

The 230 extra pokies is less than predicted but the gap has been packed with a football field of new gaming tables and a Skycity monopoly on casino gambling in Auckland until 2048.

It’s worth a pause here to remember three things us mere mortals have been lectured about by right-wing politicians for decades now.

Firstly the wondrous benefits of free-market competition. We the public are still regularly castigated for our lack of confidence in markets despite fail after epic fail. This tawdry deal has no market – it’s a private monopoly on casino gambling for the next 35 years.

Secondly we’ve been repeatedly told the public sector should not take on financial risk. Risk should be carried by the private sector because knowing they have put money into a venture they will be sure to look out for it. But there’s no risk in this deal for Skycity – just a license to print money off the backs of some of the most vulnerable in our community.

And thirdly democracy. We’ve all had the self-serving lecture that free-market capitalism is synonymous with democracy. (Yes we know the opposite is true but neo-liberals repeat it ad nauseum to anyone who will
listen) This deal trashes democracy. The casino has done its best to deny the opportunity for future government policy choices through demanding a taxpayer-funded income stream if a future government is elected to repeal this money-grubbing pact.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The deal offers us the worst of all worlds. As many have already said, around 80% of problem gamblers have their addiction to pokies and close to half pokie revenue comes from this same group and their long-suffering families.

The government says the negative impacts will be lessened with a doubling of staff looking out for problem gambling but anyone who believes host responsibility has real meaning is an idiot. It’s always been a joke and now we get double the laughs.

Skycity concern for the social harm from gambling is nothing compared to its determination to strip the pockets of the poor.

Low-income families are particularly at risk so it’s Auckland’s Maori and Pacifika families who will shoulder the bulk of the financial burden for the convention centre.

The deal is a particularly nasty insult to Aucklanders who have slogged their guts out for years to reduce pokie numbers because these designed-to-addict machines are socially destructive.

Remember all those TV adds featuring the then Manukau Mayor Len Brown surrounded by Polynesian community workers as they celebrated the sinking lid policy for pokies put in place by Brown’s Manukau Council?

That was a time when Brown would have vigorously opposed a deal like this – now he’s the hapless victim of corporate capture.

Len Brown should hang his head in shame.


  1. If National feels it can bind future governments to this vile deal for the next 35 years – can a Labour-Green-Mana government bind future governments NOT to sell state assets?

    I’d be interested to know. And what would be National’s view if a Labour-Green-Mana government put this into effect?

    As for pokie machines etc, if this is the best that National can offer New Zealand, then we are indeed in a sorry state.

    Child poverty; growing wealth/income gap; high unemployment; and a dodgy deal with a corporation that sells vice… who would have thought last century that this would be the brave new future for our country?

    And if New Zealanders think this is ok, we really have the government we deserve.

  2. Sky city will have an iron clad contract. If the greens go back on this deal, it will cost 400 million PLUS the cost to build the centre. By that time it will be under construction so stoping it would also cost quite a few jobs. This is the second green policy that I have seen that has the potential to cost the country alot of money for no gain. John Minto, if he wishes to be mayor, is going to have to show a plan to resolve this and not just do his usual scream and yell with no idea of what else to do. As for the number of pokies, by the time the centre is built, the sinking lid will have reduced the number of machines city wide to bellow todays number anyway. If john is concerned about a monoply, then he should be encouraging other pokies at other sites. I understand the problem of gambling addicts, my mother is one. Which is why she banned herself from every gambling site arround her. Its called personal responsiblity. Its not a perfect deal, but it gets a major convetion centre built for free, down town. In return an EXISTING casino just gets to continue doing what it does now. Unless someone is going to show up with 402 million to throw arround, its probably the best deal that can be had.

  3. John, I have to agree, I was so disappointed, and not a little angry. You suggest that Len is a “hapless victim of corporate culture”, I think that’s being too charitable – he is, in this instance, a timorous victim. I wonder what sort of pressure Len came under? Indeed, knowing this government and its contempt for local democracy, what sore of direct threats were made? We have to recall too that this new convention centre will compete directly with the facilities that the Auckland Council own, these include:

    Viaduct Events Centre
    Aotea Centre
    Auckland Town Hall
    The Civic
    Auckland Art Gallery
    Auckland Zoo
    Mount Smart Stadium

    So what the heck was Len thinking when he signed off on this agreement, undermining his own council controlled enterprises. The whole deal stinks and some this stench now accompanies Len in his office. When Winston Peters talks about banana republics, unusually for him, he’s guilty only of a very modest exaggeration.

Comments are closed.