National’s disdain for democracy and dissent



Continued from: National’s disdain for the law


NZ is prepared for an oil spill


Protestors vs The Power of The State…

In the late 1970s, one of the very first protest activities I became involved in was highlighting the imprisonment of Soviet dissidents in the now-defunct USSR. (This was of intense interest to me because of my Eastern European heritage.)

The Soviet Union had approximately ten thousand political prisoners locked up in “Corrective Labour Colonies”, “psychiatric” institutions, and various prisons. (Most of which were located in the Moldavian region and not the archetypal Siberian labour camp that Westerners thought characterised the Soviet political penal system.)

TDB Recommends

Two of the charges commonly laid against Soviet dissidents were “anti Soviet agitation and propaganda” and “slandering the Soviet system.” Either charge could land a hapless political activist in prison for five, seven, ten, or more years.

The heavy sentences were handed down not just to isolate dissidents from their colleagues and the public – but to serve as a dire warning to anyone else who might ‘buck the system’.

That could never happen here in New Zealand, right?



It is happening here, and now, in our own country.

After the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico,  in April 2010, it was  little wonder that East Coast locals and environmental activists joined together to protest against deep-sea drilling of their coast.

East Coasters – and the rest of the country – have  had a clear warning of the potential danger of an environmental catastrophe that might strike the region. One that we are simply unprepared for, as the grounding of the MV Rena showed, eighteen months later.

Public disquiet and anger was such that by November 2011,  Key was prepared to be secretive about his meetings and discussions with oil companies,


Acknowledgement: TV3 -Key keeps meeting with Anadarko boss quiet


In normal circumstances it would seem unusual that a Prime Minister would keep such a top-level meeting secret. One would think that it should be quite a coup to have  a visiting CEO of such a large corporation visiting New Zealand. Especially where there is Big Money to be made.

Remember Key’s recent big trips to Hollywood? South America? China?

Recently, on TVNZ’s Q+A, on 3 April, Energy Minister and Dear Leader Mini-Me, Simon Bridges announced a new law with heavy sanctions against protesters who “want to stop other people going about their lawful business and doing what they have a permit to do and they are legally entitled to do”.

He said, in part,

JESSICA MUTCH I want to start off by asking you your predecessor in a speech, Phil Heatley, said, ‘I’m determined to ensure the mining sector is not hampered by unsafe protest actions by a small but vocal minority.’ You’ve been working on this since taking over. What are protesters in for?

SIMON BRIDGES So, that’s right. So we are acting, and so two offences are going to be put into the Crown Minerals Bill. Look, the first of those is truly criminal offence. Effectively, what it says is that it will be stopping people out there at deep sea, in rough waters, dangerous conditions, doing dangerous acts, damaging and interfering with legitimate business interests with ships, for example, seismic ships, and what they’re doing out there.

JESSICA What fines are we talking about there?

SIMON Well, for that one, 12 months’ imprisonment, or $1000 (please note: the minister meant $100,000 not $1000) or $50,000 fine, depending on whether you’re a body corporate or an individual. Then a lesser, more infringement offence, really, strict liability offence for entering within a specified area, probably up to 500 metres within that ship, again because of the dangers associated with doing that.

Acknowledgement: TVNZ:  Q+A – Transcript Simon Bridges Interview

Bridges even admitted that vested interests were involved in the law-change,

JESSICA Did mining companies complain to the Government?

SIMON Oh, there have been complaints. Look, I’ve talked with a range of businesses.

JESSICA So isn’t this just basically a sot to mineral companies and mining companies?

SIMON No, I don’t think so. In fact, I think what’s also true is this is best practice. You look at Australia, you look at other countries, they already do this. We’re also, I think, here filling a gap in the sense that to the Territorial Sea – that’s 12 miles out – you already have these sorts of provisions. Even the Exclusive Economic Zone, as I say, a massive area – 4 million-odd square kilometres – there are some provisions for oil rigs and so on. But for these moving vessels, where it was very dangerous and we thought so, that’s where we’re acting.

JESSICA Was this prompted by the Elvis Teddy case?

SIMON Look, that’s certainly part of the genesis of this.

Acknowledgement: IBID

The hypocrisy and self-serving nature of the proposal to criminalise protest action was best exemplified when Bridges assured viewers that he “passionately” supported people’s right to protest,

JESSICA Don’t you think a lot of New Zealanders would agree, though, that people have a right to protest? Even if I’m not out there with a placard, you still support people’s right to be able to do it.

SIMON Absolutely, and I think, you know, that goes to the heart of being a democracy. I believe that passionately. My point is there are a huge variety of ways which New Zealanders can protest about anything. I would never want to stop that, but what they can’t do is dangerously, recklessly interfere with other people’s rights to go about their business.

Acknowledgement: IBID

And yet, when Bridges talks about the right to protest, he is adamant that “what they can’t do is dangerously, recklessly interfere with other people’s rights to go about their business”.

I would submit to the Minister that  proposed legislative changes are directed at the wrong party. It is oil companies that should be prevented from undertaking activicties that would  “dangerously, recklessly interfere with other people’s rights to go about their business” should another blowout send millions of barrels of oil washing across our East Coast.


MV Rena and Deepwater Horizon oil slicks


Unfortunately I cannot submit anything to the Minister. No one can. (Except oil companies.)

It  is a startling fact: the proposed law change to criminalise sea-borne protests will not go before a Parliamentary Select Committee. It will be passed through Parliament as a Supplementary Order Paper, meaning that it will avoid Select Committee scrutiny or a Public consultation process.

This blogger cannot emphasise how repugnant this proposed law-change is – nor how much it brings to mind the abuse of State power, as happened in the Soviet/Eastern Europe bloc.

This is how National wants to rule; by decree from the Executive.

Replace “Cabinet”  with “Politburo”, and you begin to get an understanding of what I’m describing  here.

It does away with the Parliamentary process; it avoids scrutiny by a Select Committee; and it eliminates any opportunity for the public to be involved by making submissions.

This is bad law-making.

This is anti-democratic.

This is naked authoritarianism.

This has the hallmarks of a government that distrusts and fears it’s own people and views public inclusion with disdain.

Never mind Labour’s so-called  “Nanny State” that National complained about in 2007 and 2008 – this has all the hallmarks of a quasi-fascist state.

This is a desperate, shabby thing that Simon Bridges and his Party are doing.

It is so wrong that I am in disbelief that it is happening.

Continued at: National’s disdain for taking responsibility



Addendum – Update


Legislation cracking down on mining protests passes third reading

Acknowledgement: Radio NZ – Legislation cracking down on mining protests passes third reading


In just under two weeks, National has rammed this legislative amendment through the House, with the assistance of two grubby MPs who should not even be in Parliament.

Nek Step: National passes legislation banning all protest activity in public places. Key reassures New Zealanders that protest activity will still be legal in the privacy of peoples’ own homes. (Though for assemblies of three or more people, a Police-SIS-ODESC-GSCB  permit will be required.)

Law abiding New Zealanders will having nothing to fear, Dear Leader Key reasurres us, as long as those New Zealanders do nothing.




Previous related blogposts

Corporate Welfare under National

Anadarko: Key playing with fire

Petrobras withdraws – sanity prevails

On the smell of an oily rag


NZ Herald: Protester law avoids public submissions and Bill of Rights vetting  (3 April 2013)

Other Blogs

The Daily Blog: The Conspirators

The Daily Blog: The Guts and the Authority: Curbing the Powers of the GCSB

The Daily Blog: Worse Than We Thought: Rebecca Kitteridge and the New “Community” of Spooks



= fs =


  1. what can be done to stop this Frank? how do i make my views know before i’m locked up. up here in Northland we have a mayor(brown) who is a huge supporter of the drilling/mining companies.

    • All we need to do is vote these ass hats out of office. The only problem, and I suspect this is also why voter turn out is so low, is that the alternative candidates are also ass hats.
      Try and get everyone you know to think outside of the mainstream party box. Not voting is not an option – vote “no confidence” to let the established parties know you specifically DON’T support them.
      MANA caters primarily to Maori, which is fine and relevant, but imo will never achieve anything resembling mainstream pakeha support.
      The true solution is to start a brand NEW party from scratch that excites the disappointed, the discontented, the disaffected, the disadvantaged, the disillusioned, and the disenfranchised.

      • MANA has an agenda of improving the predicament of the disadvantaged regardless of ethnicity. But I think some of Hone Harawira’s controversial past remarks may scare away some non-Maori from support. Also I think there are right-wing elements with some who are disadvantaged, disillusioned etc. Personally, I have respect for the MANA Party but I often think they lack a bit in the way of a vision.

        But I agree and have been thinking for some time that there probably is a place for a new party to make up for what’s lacking in MANA, Greens and particularly Labour – a lot of hurdles to overcome though. If National is elected for a third term, maybe that will be the catalyst for a significant new movement?

        I also think there are many complex issues to consider getting more people politically active.

      • Also, it’s great to find blogs that promote awareness and debate the many issues where the mainstream media fail. But with regard to solutions to many of the issues, the blogosphere falls short. Perhaps it is time the blogs start debating solutions? May encourage more people to become more politically active and engaged? Might bring about more change in line with the wishes of the people.

  2. Freedom isn’t the choice you have down at the shop but having a say in your governance.

    This government is getting rid of that right because it stands in the way of the rich getting richer at everyone else’s expense.

  3. My father often remarks how similar this government is to the Communist Party, amongst many expletives.

    There was an excellent documentary on Maori Television last night The War on Democracy by the ever brilliant John Pilger. (I wonder how long Maori Television will be running for after broadcasting the quality programming that they do?)

    While watching it, it’s easy to draw comparisons to the situation here. We find ourselves burdened with this government giving us the same treatment Latin America endured over the decades, the pursuit of extremist “free-market” policies for the benefit of US corporates at the expense of democracy and the people. How far is this government prepared to go? Will the blatant disregard for social welfare see us facing the hopeless poverty as shown in Chile or Bolivia, while our natural resources are exploited for the benefit of wealthy investors and overseas corporates?

    Everybody I know is living in modest circumstances or struggling. I’m sure there are many more in this country in the same predicament. Why the complacency? Why is everyone prepared to tolerate the machinations of this government?

    At no other time in my life have I ever felt the possibility of losing everything. Change is desperately needed. An authoritarian, unabashed fascist state respects no human dignity.

    I can’t stand how Simon Bridges speaks – notice the similarities to the way John Key speaks. I would like to know who is coaching the National Party; many of them have that irritating way of speaking and smiling like John Key.

  4. Totally agree Procrastinator. Watched doco “War on Democracy”. Besides being brilliant and very depressing, the thing that occured to me was NZ is going through same BS. Similar thing happened in Mayo, Ireland when Shell wanted a pipeline built. Local garda arresting the protestors. There was a great doco on this but cant remember name of it.

Comments are closed.