YOUI WINS 2016 ROGER AWARD – For The Worst Transnational Corporation Operating In Aotearoa/New Zealand

By   /   April 10, 2017  /   3 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

Youi was a finalist because, as the nominator wrote: “Youi uniquely, does not do business online. Very deliberately, they insist on everything being done over the phone. Once engaged in conversation, their call centre staff insist on being given the caller’s credit card details on purely spurious grounds. Once the company has those details, it starts taking money off the card or out of the caller’s bank account.

YOUI WINS 2016 ROGER AWARD

For The Worst Transnational Corporation Operating In Aotearoa/New Zealand

IAG/State Insurance Is Second. Uber Third

The full Judges Report, with details on all winners and finalists, is online here.

The six finalists were: Bathurst Resources, Coca Cola, IAG/State Insurance, Uber, Westpac and Youi.

The criteria for judging are by assessing the transnational (a corporation which is 25% or more foreign-owned) that has the most negative impact in each or all of the following categories: people – unemployment, impact on tangata whenua, impact on women, impact on children, abuse of workers/conditions, health and safety of workers and the public;environment – environmental damage, abuse of animals; political interference – interference in democratic processes, running an ideological crusade; and economic dominance – monopoly, profiteering, tax dodging, cultural imperialism.

The five judges were: David Small, a lawyer and Associate Dean in Education at the University of Canterbury; Dean Parker, Auckland writer and former Writers’ Guild delegate to the Council of Trade Unions; Sue Bradford, community activist with Auckland Action Against Poverty and Economic and Social Research Aotearoa (ESRA); Deborah Russell, feminist, social and political commentator and tax expert, Tertiary Education Union member, and candidate for the Labour Party in 2014; and Teresa O’Connor, Co-Editor of Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, the national nursing magazine; a celebrant; and a founding member of Voice Nelson, a social justice activist group in Nelson, primarily concerned with housing, employment and health.

The winners were announced at an event in Auckland on April 6th.

Youi was a finalist because, as the nominator wrote: “Youi uniquely, does not do business online. Very deliberately, they insist on everything being done over the phone. Once engaged in conversation, their call centre staff insist on being given the caller’s credit card details on purely spurious grounds. Once the company has those details, it starts taking money off the card or out of the caller’s bank account. Despite the caller not being a Youi customer or having taken out a Youi policy (this is the most egregious aspect of this corporate crime). The caller may simply have rung up for a quote for car insurance, decided not to join Youi and stuck with his or her existing insurance company.. But Youi, having got his or her credit card details, proceeds to start taking money out. Youi has pleaded guilty to 15 representative charges filed by the Commerce Commission (and was fined $320,000). Plus it has been fined $100,000 (the maximum possible) by the Insurance Council of NZ, of which it is a member (and has been allowed to remain so)”.

The judges had this to say about Youi:

Deborah Russell: What makes Youi the leader of the pack is the way that it set up conditions that pressured its employees to behave in ways that deceived and defrauded customers. It’s clear that the individual employees engaged in behaviours that bullied and deceived, but it’s also clear that it was the working and remuneration conditions that pressured them into engaging in this behaviour.

David Small: Their approach to hounding people into signing policies, or taking money from people who have not signed is unlawful, unethical, highly disturbing and traumatising. It becomes a huge, time-consuming and complex task for people to try and extricate themselves from the clutches of Youi without losing money to them. If Youi are this bad at creating policies, I shudder to think what they would be like if one were in the unfortunate position of having a claim against them.

Teresa O’Connor: The Insurance Council of New Zealand’s imposition of its maximum fine of $100,000 on Youi is proof positive that this transnational corporation is indeed a rogue among rogues.

Dean Parker: Youi – outright criminals!

Chief Judge Sue Bradford wrote: Youi and (third placegetter) Uber are very similar. They don’t care about breaking the law. They just carry on abusing legal niceties and workers because they have had so much money poured into them. They are part of the new face of global capitalism taken to state-of-the-art levels of local illegality…Youi seems unrepentant despite court cases and fines for its outrageous rip off of customers and potential customers. For sheer cheekiness and disregard for the law Uber and Youi are up there.

The decision is accompanied by an extremely detailed and referenced Judges’ Report on South African-owned Youi: “In 2015, insurance company IAG/State won the Roger for its use of ‘delay-deny-defend’ tactics as it weaseled out of full and prompt settlement of the Canterbury earthquake claims of its small policyholders. In 2016, newcomer YouInsurance (Youi) storms into the lead with its guilty plea to a proven record of outright theft and fraud at the expense of its customers. Investigative journalist Diana Clement, who broke the story, says ‘I have been a journalist for over 30 years and this is one of the most despicable and shameful companies I have ever come across. I am still completely gobsmacked on a daily basis at how they treat New Zealanders’ Needless to say, although the company was successfully prosecuted and fined a token sum in 2016, not one of the managers and executives responsible has been prosecuted, the company continues to operate in New Zealand under its Reserve Bank licence, Youi remains a full member of the New Zealand Insurance Council, Hansard records no mention of the scandal in Parliament, television continues to carry the company’s deceptive advertising, and the Chief Executive Officer on whose watch it all happened has been promoted”.

The subheadings of the Judges Report tell the story very succinctly: “One Of The Most Despicable And Shameful Companies”; Incentivises Staff To Falsify And Defraud; No Written Record; Unauthorised Deductions; Caught Red-Handed In Full-Scale Criminal Scam; Minimal Penalty, Fine Effectively Refunded; Fraud And Theft Continue; Everything Depends On Reinsurance.

The Judges Report concludes: “While ideally, a new entrant into insurance should have been welcome as a means of keeping the others honest, this one looks to have introduced a new low in an already disreputable industry”.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

3 Comments

  1. Mike the Lefty says:

    YOUI probably advertise on Whaleoil.

  2. countryboy says:

    A crooked insurance company? ??? Noooooo…. ! Surely not ! ? I’m sooooo surprised and disillusioned with the honourable practise of ‘insuring’.

    “Insurance” ; To pay a third party money to assuage fear of losing $-ers and stuff installed in us by the MSM lobbied by insurers to induce fear in us against losing our $-ers and stuff.
    Insurers could also be called ‘casinos’ . What burns down and smells like money?

  3. […] This is the well respected and academically rigorous Roger Awards and this is what their annual award stands for… […]