Calling time on Trojan horse treaties

By   /   October 26, 2016  /   5 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

If you’re concerned about the TPPA, there is even worse to come. TiSA is a new trade deal that would leave citizens powerless to set the rules about what big multinational corporations can do in our communities and workplaces.

screen-shot-2016-10-26-at-5-34-20-pm

If you’re concerned about the TPPA, there is even worse to come. TiSA is a new trade deal that would leave citizens powerless to set the rules about what big multinational corporations can do in our communities and workplaces.

Governments and corporate lobbyists are desperately trying to lock in new treaties that would prevent future governments from rolling back pro-corporate policies. They recognise that there has been a fundamental swing in public opinion against treaties like the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), and they are mounting a last ditch push for new treaties, particularly the dangerous Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA).

They should not be allowed to do so. It is not only national sovereignty that is under threat – it is also the political space for democratically elected governments to reverse the failed liberalisation policies of the past.

US ratification of the TPPA hangs in the balance. It would be unprecedented for such a major treaty as the TPPA to be forced through in the ‘lame-duck’ period between the US Presidential election and the new President taking office, especially since it is opposed by both candidates. But corporate lobbyists are lining up with their chequebooks to offer a lucrative send off to departing Congress and Senate representatives. Whatever happens, the TPPA will not come into force before the next New Zealand election. In government, our plan as the Green Party will be to withdraw New Zealand from the TPPA.    

But we also need to be aware of other dangers. There is also a huge push for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) to be concluded before the end of this year. Like other treaties, the word ‘trade’ masks the reality. This is another Trojan horse treaty that hides dangerous restrictions on the rights of governments to regulate business. TiSA is huge, encompassing 50 governments, two thirds of the NZ economy, and 70 percent of all jobs.

As with the TPPA, the details have been kept secret. Cover sheets to leaked chapters suggest the negotiating documents, aside from the final text, will not be released until five years after the negotiations finish, too far into the future to hold government to account. Trade agreements do not have to be so secret. The EU, Switzerland, and Norway are now releasing details of their negotiating proposals, as have previous New Zealand governments. But not this Government. The Trade Minister, Todd McClay, pretends to consult, but there is no sign that he is listening.

We know some of the TiSA dangers from a number of chapters of the negotiations text that have ended up on Wikileaks (https://wikileaks.org/tisa/).

TiSA would further liberalise financial services, even though the Stiglitz Commission warned that these kinds of treaties contributed to the Global Financial Crisis. The lessons have not been learned. TiSA would restrict the powers of government to control speculative flows of money or limit ‘innovative’ financial products or limit the size of financial institutions. Instead of regulating the corporations that are ‘too big to fail’, TiSA would add steroids to their diet.

Proposals in the TiSA energy chapter would remove the rights of government to differentiate between fossil fuel energy and renewable energy, undermining action on climate change. E-commerce proposals would prevent governments from regulating new technologies, even though we have no idea what rules and protections may be required. Agreements like Maritime Services would lead to a race to the bottom for workers’ rights. Walmart and others are seeking through TiSA to prevent local governments and communities from deciding where new supermarkets can locate and how big they can be.

The US Chamber of Commerce supports its dominant IT corporations and cloud-based storage by removing the right of governments to require data to be held locally – this would undermine the right of privacy and data protection, while opening up our own personal data to US surveillance.

In addition, there are parts of the agreement that apply across all service sectors. New Zealand trade negotiators have proposed a radical new test so that regulation would have to be “no more burdensome than necessary”. This means no more burdensome to foreign corporations, rather than no more burdensome to citizens or small business or vulnerable people. Such a test that could potentially be used to overturn virtually any regulation, except where corporations are subsidised to accept regulation. This proposal would create the conditions for many more regulatory failures like the Pike River disaster, finance company collapses, and leaky homes.

We need governments to have the right to protect the environment and take action on climate change, uphold the rights of workers and rights under te Tiriti o Waitangi, protect public health, regulate financial speculation and support small and local businesses. TiSA represents a major threat to sound regulation in the public interest. As usual, there is a phrase that says governments retain the right to regulate, but as the WTO Panel in 2004 put it, “regulatory sovereignty ends when the rights of other Members under the GATS are impaired.”

New Zealand has been pushing these negotiations, as part of a group called “The Really Good Friends of Services” (sic). Behind them is a group of corporations that have been driving these negotiations in their own interests. In the initial negotiations, the WTO Director of Services said that, without the tremendous pressure exerted by financial services companies like Citicorp and American Express, there would have been no WTO agreement on services. Now Citicorp is the Chair of the powerful Coalition of Services Industries pushing TiSA.

There is a growing international movement against these Trojan horse treaties.  After opposition from France and Germany, and actions by over two million EU citizens, the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) will not go ahead. There are substantial and growing movements against treaties for corporate rights, including leading trade, economics and legal experts, as well as civil society groups.

Todd McClay has called for a trade policy “refresh”. That would be like putting on a band aid when major surgery is needed. It is time for a fundamental change towards treaties that respect sovereignty, environmental limits, greater equality, human rights, and local economies.

Barry Coates MP

Green Party spokesperson on Trade and Investment.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

5 Comments

  1. CLEANGREEN says:

    Good article Barry

    we are being taken over by Corporate monsters at the hands of a spineless sell-out National Monsters it is that simple bloody criminals history will record them as.

  2. SpaceMonkey says:

    These treaties are the spearhead of a new wave of colonisation… this time by corporations.

    • LOSTRELIC says:

      It was already taking place, but I think the loud outcry through activist channels over the TPPA has caused a lot of other corporates to take note, and get their money in on these deals. To businessmen, the activist community are on the one hand little more than a nuisance, but on the other are also seen as beneficial: activist alarms act as foghorns to signal to businessmen what the big boys are doing, and where their money should be going.

  3. Mike in Auckland says:

    From the horses mouth, almost, they are now facing the end of their endless FTA adventures and insults to people that are affected:

    https://www.ft.com/content/f5128512-9baa-11e6-8f9b-70e3cabccfae

    http://citizensagainstceta.blogspot.co.nz/

    They always tell us about doom and gloom if no new agreements are signed, that would mean, they can only “grow” the economy by signing new deals, as otherwise we face “disaster”.

    This is like being addicted to crack, is it not, as it means, we cannot manage with what we got, so we need more FTAs.

    Why can we not do more and better with what we have, while we also face sustainability issues?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/10/27/world-facing-biggest-mass-extinction-since-dinosaurs-warn-expert/

    People and governments live in total denial, and think more “growth” will solve all our issues, but we are lied to something big, and most out there live in damned lala land, have no clue and will all face the massive ecological collapse, over time.

    http://400.350.org/

    Never mind, put your mental blinkers on, jump into your car, drive to the mall, as usual, fill your bag with products made from industrial farming and killing bobby calves as collateral damage, and with fish caught in over fished oceans, no matter what.

    Most reading this will turn off and continue denial, it is all lost, the game, unless a dramatic change happens. I dare say we need eco terrorism, to force a change, we cannot trust hopeless, compromised governments and people with corrupted minds, who want to continue as is, no matter what it means.

  4. Mike in Auckland says:

    People are not getting this, the MSM rather continues reporting on the symptoms than the causes, and never mentions the practical and necessary solutions.

    We have backward minds in government, backward minds in MSM, backward minds in most of the population, who all seem hell bent to self destruct, as any warning voices continue to be ridiculed.

    This is the challenge, we are aware this was coming years ago, the Paris agreement is totally insufficient and we will not solve this with what the present people in charge committed to:

    http://www.climatecentral.org/news/co2-400-ppm-global-record-18965