YES – it really DOES matter that you turn out this Saturday for the International Day of Action against the TPPA!

By   /   November 6, 2014  /   17 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

It is a hell of a lot easier to stop the TPPA being concluded than trying to prevent it coming into force after the deal has been signed. This is the time to ram that message home, not just to the government, but to the opposition parties as well – including the prospective Labour leaders whom I have yet to see stake a position on the TPPA.

8611830729589719638

There is a mythology that the TPPA will never happen. That is a reckless assumption. It encourages complacency and inaction. And it is seriously wrong.

The political leaders of the twelve countries know they have to do the deal soon or it will become paralysed.

That won’t happen when the trade ministers meet on 8th November in Beijing on the margins of APEC.  But it could happen within a couple of months. No one should doubt how serious they are.

That was obvious at the ministerial meeting ten days ago in Sydney.

The pressure on the negotiators in the handful of remaining sensitive chapters is intense, as if they have instructions to finish their technical work so the ministers can finalise the deal.

What has been saving us all is the continued standoff between the US and Japan over agriculture and automobiles.

That could continue to save us. But don’t bet on it.

There are mixed views about what the Republican victory in Tuesday’s mid-term Congressional elections in the US will mean. It is already being spun to say that Republicans are pro-free trade and will be better for the TPPA, so they may give Obama fast track authority to ease the TPPA through Congress. That would reassure the other governments at the table and encourage them to finalise the deal.

Those who are tracking developments in Congress, such as Lori Wallach from Public Citizen, disagree. There is a real hatred of Obama in some Republican circles, and the price for fast track would be hugely controversial, such as rules on so-called currency manipulation, which some countries couldn’t agree to.

On the Japan side, it is unclear how the political scandals in the Abe government might affect the shape of a final deal with the US on agriculture and automobiles. Abe also has a controversial tax change to steer through the Diet in the next few months that will use up a lot of his scarce political capital.

Despite these factors, both the US and Japan need an outcome. Soon. They could well do a pragmatic deal that works for them, and let the dominos fall.

I can see four scenarios.

Scenario one:  The US and Japan decide to play by the supposed rules of November 2011 and liberalise everything for everyone. And flocks of flying pigs will fill the skies over the twelve countries.

Scenario two: The US and Japan cannot reach agreement on agriculture. Everything remains stalled. After some time – who knows how long – they stop pretending and suspend negotiations.

They know that once they do that, the momentum is almost impossible to regain. The Doha round at the World Trade Organization started in 2001, was suspended in 2007, then restarted but no-one would know! In this scenario, expect the TPPA to drag on with no one willing to pull the plug.

Scenario three: The US and Japan reach a deal on agriculture and automobiles, and offer virtually nothing to everyone else. That is consistent with what Japan reportedly offered to New Zealand on dairy in Sydney. Canada will happily follow suit, hiding behind the US and Japan. Faced with this, Groser can’t bring himself to walk away, swallows the rat, accepts what’s on offer and agrees to trade-off our medicines, internet, investment, SOEs, etc.

Scenario four:  Groser does what he has threatened to do, and walks away because there is no meaningful liberalisation on agriculture. More flocks of pigs join their whanau in scenario 1.

The agriculture lobby is terrified because they know the third option is the most likely. That saw them at panic stations last week with a series of statements from Federated Farmers, the dairy lobby, Groser and sympathetic journalists insisting that New Zealand must be prepared to walk away from a lousy deal.

Groser will never walk away. He views the TPPA deal as his brainchild. He will spin whatever is in the final deal as the first step to something that will bring huge long-term benefits to New Zealand. ‘We can’t afford not to be part of the biggest deal between the world’s biggest trading powers … ‘

If he is clever – and he is – Groser could seek to defer implementation of the worst parts of the TPPA so the impacts are delayed. Better still, if Parliament didn’t have to change the law immediately, the US would be unable to hold New Zealand to ransom over compliance (the blackmail process known as ‘certification’).

Then Groser can say, ‘see, the scaremongering about the TPPA was a big beat up.’ By the time the impacts are felt, his role as the minister who negotiated the TPPA (and hopefully the National government) will be history.

This could well happen unless we turn up the heat, on and after Saturday.

Defeatists will say that taking to the streets won’t make any difference. But activists in Australia, Japan, Malaysia and the US will be doing the same. The collective pressure does matter. The other governments are nervous about who can deliver on what they are promising, especially when it is unpopular at home.

It is a hell of a lot easier to stop the TPPA being concluded than trying to prevent it coming into force after the deal has been signed. This is the time to ram that message home, not just to the government, but to the opposition parties as well – including the prospective Labour leaders whom I have yet to see stake a position on the TPPA.

So see you Saturday in AucklandHamiltonRaglanTaurangaRotoruaNew PlymouthNapier,Palmerston NorthLevinWellingtonNelsonChristchurchTimaruDunedinInvercargill.  Details onitsourfuture.org.nz.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

17 Comments

  1. Lee says:

    “TPPA:

    Do you want foreign corporates writing NZ law to suit themselves at your loss?

    Do you want them to be able to sue the NZ government for costs if they fail to gain their profits?

    You don’t?

    Then protest: Saturday… blah blah blah…”

    Keep it simple. I bet if you asked anyone in suburban/rural service town NZ about the TPPA, they would even know it existed. I’ve seen a couple of photocopied A4 panic posters hastily stuck to lamposts in the CBD, but they look like advertsements for a rock band dystopian vision, not a simple argument, a simple slogan, a simple single-sentence summary, to cause alarm.

    When you “turn up the heat after Saturday” can you keep it simple? Otherwise average Joe and Joelene are never going to engage – and you do need them… don’t you? It’s not that they don’t care, that they don’t understand the concepts, or that they’re defeatists, it’s that they’ve not heard the message in simple terms. Ordinary people have lives you know. We aren’t all activists 24/7, yeah?

    • Maria says:

      Joe and Joelene don’t know about the TPPA because there has been at best maybe 3hrs coverage on the t.v …… since 2008 lol

    • Ovicula says:

      Lee, what’s stopping you from printing out a few simple posters and sticking them somewhere?

  2. FreeManNZ FreeManNZ says:

    I’ll be there. A strong public march shows disapproval for the proposal to those negotiating it. Even if they pay the public no mind and ignore protests it is better to march and let dissent be known than do nothing and have it claimed that this is tacit approval for the TPPA.

    This agreement is just another way in which national sovereignty is being undermined. If you care about New Zealand, as a nation, as a place the next generation can be proud of as a vibrant independent country of the South Pacific, then march!

  3. Barry Johnstone says:

    Labour must do a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ (regarding the TPPA)!

  4. Jay says:

    ” A Gunpowder Plot Against Democracy ”
    ” The central problem is what the negotiators call investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). The treaty would allow corporations to sue governments before an arbitration panel composed of corporate lawyers, at which other people have no representation, and which is not subject to judicial review(12).

    Already, thanks to the insertion of ISDS into much smaller trade treaties, big business is engaged in an orgy of litigation, whose purpose is to strike down any law that might impinge on its anticipated future profits. The tobacco firm Philip Morris is suing both Uruguay and Australia for trying to discourage people from smoking(13). The oil firm Occidental was awarded $2.3bn in compensation from Ecuador, which terminated the company’s drilling concession in the Amazon when it discovered that Occidental had broken Ecuadorean law(14). The Swedish company Vattenfall is suing the German government for shutting down nuclear power(15). An Australian firm is suing El Salvador for $300m for refusing permission for a gold mine that would poison the drinking water(16).

    The same mechanism, under TTIP, could be used to prevent governments in the UK from reversing the privatisation of the railways and the National Health Service, or from defending public health and the natural world against corporate greed. Its overall effect is to chill the formation of any policy that puts people ahead of money.

    The corporate lawyers who sit on these panels are beholden only to the companies whose cases they adjudicate, who at other times are their employers(17). As one of these people commented(18), “When I wake up at night and think about arbitration, it never ceases to amaze me that sovereign states have agreed to investment arbitration at all … Three private individuals are entrusted with the power to review, without any restriction or appeal procedure, all actions of the government, all decisions of the courts, and all laws and regulations emanating from parliament.” ditto tppa! 🙁

    http://www.monbiot.com/2014/11/04/a-gunpowder-plot-against-democracy/

  5. cleangreen says:

    yes and all the security cameras will be trained on us all as potential future terror threat to the nation.

    We are already following behind the corporate machinery that is National Government so we have little hope of change unless the masses rise up and demand change.

  6. YogiBare says:

    http://www.monbiot.com/2014/11/04/a-gunpowder-plot-against-democracy/
    …for anyone interested in the EU-US state of play.

  7. Mike in Auckland says:

    You go, Jane, go, go, go. I wish I could come and join, but I will not be able to. You and others fighting for the same cause have my FULL support!

  8. Kim dandy says:

    Arrrrrrh, stop the planet, I want to get off!
    All This TPPA business is so NOT for the people – so I’ll see you all Saturday.

  9. YogiBare says:

    To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. -Ella Wheeler Wilcox, poet (1850-1919)

  10. cassie says:

    I’m sorry to say that the TRUTH is

    EVEN IF

    HALF a Million showed up, (wildest fantasy)

    NOBODY (except the participants) would ever hear about it

    Because it would NEVER be shown on the “News”.

    FACT. (BIGGEST PART OF THE PROBLEM =THEY OWN ALL THE MEDIA)

    The TPPA , I’m afraid is a “fait accompli”

    And OUR RULERS know it.



Authorised by Martyn Bradbury, The Editor, TheDailyBlog, 5 Victoria St East/Queen St, CBD, Auckland, New Zealand.