Burqa’s, Mulsim bashing and the sudden need by Key to reinvade Iraq

9
0

Screen-Shot-2014-06-22-at-8.17.38-am-300x224

I love how Key can tell the NZ media before the election that we won’t re-invade Iraq, and then as soon as he wins, just shrug it off and look to do just that.

Not content with the ability to spy on all of us to ‘protect’ us from terrorism, Key now wants to play soldier by re-invading Iraq because the other 5 Eyes are doing it and we don’t want to miss out on all the fun. That IS has occurred because of the instability created by the vacuum of invading Iraq the first time around on the grounds of weapons of mass destruction that never existed would be hilarious if it weren’t so bloody tragic.

In the new Nu Zilind post National’s incredible win, the PM can shoot an infant live on Seven Sharp and National voters will claim it was self defence by Key. If John says there are boogeymen wearing Burqa’s under the bed, NZers will squeal in fright and demand he sends in the SAS.

With their full spectrum dominance of the political system and acquiescence of the media, Key can re-invade Iraq without any real protest. The false flag nonsense of 800 Australian cops arresting 1 person for a supposed ‘terror attack’ alongside the ongoing fear campaign against Muslims drummed up by National’s favourite hate speech blogger and the NZ Herald has done enough to suddenly convince NZers that IS is some sort of threat to us justifying invasion of Iraq.

Seeing as we haven’t yet answered questions about possible war crimes in Afghanistan, rushing off to help US drone strikes blow up everything from IS fighters to wedding parties seems rash. Thankfully for the Government, we have the intellectual curiosity of scared mice, so Key will be able to say to us that the amount of NZers who want to fight for IS is surprisingly high and the vast rump of NZers will accept it without question.

I can’t recall Key ever having any problem with the NZers who want to go and fight for the IDF to commit war crimes against Palestinians, but we don’t really ask those questions in NZ do we?

On ANZAC Day many NZers will piously stand near the graves of the war dead and pay lip service as some desperate attempt to create a nationalism deprived them on Waitangi Day. They will mouth the words that ‘we will never forget’ while their Government re-invades another country under the usual false pretences of freedom and democracy without one second of self reflected irony.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Another day in the land of the wrong uptight crowd.

9 COMMENTS

  1. its common knowledge that the west or mutant forces in the american government manufacture groups like isis for an effect namely to get citizens to back wars (google war economy) and surrender their freedom, the script is so obvious, key is a very late comer and clumsy, sure theres a lot of stupid people that buy it and will do what ever there lord and master key says, theres a lot that can see exactly what he is up to, maybe he isnt aware that within the american armed forces and secret services and law, there are other forces now, working for change on all levels, that know what has been happening, they have a list of names of who is who and what they have been doing, there are many many signs and whistle blowers, i dont just mean the snowden there are others in key positions, google it. the tide is turning, i hope your john key backs down from this its all going on record
    war economy – “military Keynesianism”. The term refers to the economic component within the military-industrial complex (MIC) (aka. “the Iron Triangle”) whereby the collusion between militarism and war profiteering are manifest as a permanently subsidized industry. Wilson warned at the close of World War II that the US must not return to a civilian economy, but must keep to a “permanent war economy.”[2]

    • Because the yanks have stolen so much from the 3rd world it has got to be forever on the defensive, never admitting it’s guilt or complicity with the monetary powers that drive it.

  2. Its so frustrating that the majority of NZ’ers swallow the bs propaganda so readily.Or is it that, its so far removed ,that they couldn’t care less.Talk about cause and effect.

  3. 100% agree with this entry. Surely, it shouldn’t have surprised that the “War on Terrorism” has produced MORE terrorism, not less, given that both the earlier “War on Drugs” and “War on Poverty” also produced EXACTLY the opposite results. These things are DESIGNED from the outset to NEVER be “won”, but rather create new, incredibly expensive agencies with previously unlawful powers that serve mainly to instill fear in the people to further strip them of their liberties. Democracy has become a farce.

  4. “Whatever its failings as a military force (see my last article) it still has an amazing knack for generating scare stories in the Western press. Last time I tried to show why the hype about IS’s advances on its Western Front (the Syria/Turkish border zone) meant a lot less than the panic headlines suggested. Well, no sooner did the noise about that front die down than we had a new panic on IS’s Eastern Front, with stories headlined “IS One Mile from Baghdad.”

    Most of these stories came from idiotic right-wing sites like the comically mis-named American Thinker, which was naïve enough to ask, “Is Baghdad about to Fall to ISIS?”

    But there were plenty of mainstream fools joining the panic, as I saw when I was fool enough to watch some of the BBC’s Lyse Doucet’s report from Baghdad.

    There was Lyse, bouncing around in a Humvee, saying with a straight face that IS was advancing on Baghdad “…from 20 directions.”

    Twenty directions? I mean, there was poor Franco, thinking he was being cute with his famous Fifth Column in the attack on Madrid, and the poor bastard didn’t even realize he was wasting 15 potential avenues of attack. Not that I know what those missing 15 directions are. Maybe they could bring on Stephen Hawking to explain it, because I’m pretty sure you’re going to need more than three dimensions.

    The BBC is a little vague about distance and direction throughout Doucet’s report. At one point, she says IS is “sixteen miles away”; then, pointing across a scrub field, she says, “…The people of Baghdad still feel threatened, and you can see why.” Except you can’t. You can see a tree, way off there, but no tanks, no black flags, nuthin’. So she explains, “Islamic State fighters are about five miles away.”

    Then Doucet interviews Ahmed Chalabi—I mean, he wouldn’t lie, would he?—who says IS is only “six kilometers away.”

    To quote the smart-ass Clooney character in O Brother, Where Art Thou, “Well, ain’t this place a geographical oddity!” It’s as if IS is as close as you want it to be, as scary as you want it to be.”
    http://pando.com/2014/10/02/the-war-nerd-islamic-state-is-sulking-on-the-edge-of-baghdad/

    Check out “Gary Brecher -The War Nerd”, my favourite writer on conflict.
    http://pando.com/author/garybrecher/

  5. No way would Key send troops or SAS to Iraq. The last thing he needs is body bags being off-loaded at Ohakea, and images appearing on the 6PM news.

    That would be the end of his dream run.

    • not necessarily, he has done a lot of shocking things very casually so far and gets more support, i didnt believe in satan b4 key, now Im not so sure. he has a lot of the hall marks of hitler, just saying, google how hilter duped most of his citizens

Comments are closed.