First point raised by The Internet Party, ‘no deal with National’.
This lines up with Hone’s first demand that the Internet Party is committed to a change in a National led Government.
The policies are sincere enough and within the kaupapa.
Now the issue is candidates. If MANA can see trustworthy candidates, a MANA Movement-Internet Party Alliance is an issue that will be debated in earnest at MANAs AGM in a few weeks time.
He’s left the freemasons?
Now Mana has a veto on the candidates that Mr Dotcom’s party selects. This just gets uglier and uglier.
Ugly was NAct trying to sell Banks as a libertarian ACT member. Ugly were the people of Epsom that let them do it. Ugly are Gooseman’s worthless contributions to this blog. Keep going. Your reward might even be a date with Rachel Glucina.
Sure, debated in earnest. The debate at the Mana AGM would go like this…
“So who thinks we should team up with the Internet Party?”
*silence*
“OK, what would be the benefit for Mana if we teamed up with the Internet Party?”
*silence*
“Cool, I guess that’s sorted then”
I like what Gordon Campbell has to say on the subject in his latest post
http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2014/03/28/gordon-campbell-on-mana-and-dotcom/
Comments are closed.