Why Central Government ended up supporting the Rail Link

By   /   July 9, 2013  /   4 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

Despite the announcements, it does get challenging trying to maintain a positive outlook in the local government environment. We remain the ‘whipping boy’ for central government when a distraction is needed

Auckland-Inner-City-Rail-Link1

As I think about the embarrassment of riches that were the announcements from government at the end of last month, delivering the funding (albeit with a built in delay) for the rail link, the third harbour crossing and the completion of the motorway network; I am trying to keep some sort of perspective.
“Blimey almost enough to make you vote for National” said a friend in an over emotional moment brought about by one or three glasses of bubbles. Seriously though, I have to admit to a huge sense of relief to have the rail link finally endorsed as a critical piece of infrastructure for New Zealand, now we just need to sort out the timing. Whilst it would be churlish not to say thanks, I am not in the mood however for getting carried away.

The politics leading up to the announcement were very interesting and the final announcement a surprise. So why did the government say yes? For the rail link, we simply set out the very clear vision, worked to build a very clear financial case and then the Auckland community stated very clearly that they understood the case and supported the investment and wanted the government to back Auckland.

Another vital ingredient was the support and strategic backing given by the wider local government community to the rail link proposal. The government has realised it can no longer on play the “Jaffa card”, relying on the outrage of the rest of the country when a large chunk of money headed to Auckland.

As I have said before, the local government sector is working in a real spirit of collaboration these days, brought about by the collective frustration at central governments ongoing negativity towards our sector. I believe that the strategists looked at the support for the rail link in Auckland, the election coming up and the fact that there were no votes in saying no any more.

Despite the announcements, it does get challenging trying to maintain a positive outlook in the local government environment. We remain the ‘whipping boy’ for central government when a distraction is needed, Minister Amy Adams is busy preparing legislation to ensure that councils are unable to support the wishes of their local communities and take a more precautionary approach to the release of GMOs. We have the resource consenting issue in Christchurch, where the agenda to centralise planning into one or two national processing centres rolls on and finally to add insult to injury, the constitutional review currently underway, doesn’t even mention local government.

Enough of the negativity, the Unitary Plan process is progressing well with all the pieces of feedback from our community being processed and scanned and put up on the website (all 22 700 of them!) This keeps our promise to be as transparent as we can be and try and pioneer new ways of working. Our community has come up with with amazing solutions to some key issues we have been challenged to solve and we have been weaving these into the plan. It is tremendously rewarding to see a plan come together utilising the wisdom of the Auckland community, the process is not without risks but I believe the more we do this as a collaborative process the less risk will be.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

4 Comments

  1. fambo says:

    National is like an abusive parent or carer who treats the dependent person badly so consistently that when they finally do something right the dependent person feels grateful for what they have gotten, rather than angry at the ongoing abuse.

  2. Tim says:

    And – nor is it ‘negative’ to want to ensure democracy exists at local/community level – rather than the Natzi centralisation agenda that is in play under the current junta.
    I’m surprised that even in Christchurch – where Gerry’s boys have inflicted a scorched Earth – demolish all/level-to-the-ground and start again (city first, suburban plebs second), more thought hasn’t been put into the potential for rail.

    Actually it’s pretty telling isn’t it, that this is the 21st Century.
    Neither Auckland, nor Wellington, nor Christchrch, nor Dunedin has an airport to city rail link, yet in at least 3 cases, it wouldn’t be that hard to do

  3. Molly says:

    I’m guessing it is a fairly challenging position to be in, given the type of “goodwill” currently being shown by central government.

    From my point of view, until they come up with the money and a much shorter time-frame, they have provided nothing towards the CRL but spin.

    However, did want to thank you and the other nine councillors for voting not to support the Skycity casino deal. Although, government is arrogantly going ahead, it is important that there are representatives who stand up and say “We do not agree”.

  4. Robert M says:

    Under the MMP electoral system the odds are so biased against National the Cabinet had no choice anyway. Bill English and the Mary English were sure to have been closet supporters anyway. Connor appears to have been a supporter anyway as his articles suggest the need to keep the NZ poor corralled in city highrises and off valuable farmland for cows
    The international finance market has doubtlessly not yet perceived the low cost recovery on fares chargeable, the lack of two way traffic on the lines given the unexciting nature of South and West Auckland and the unattractive nature of Auckland and CBD with its old hotels and poorly equipped motels and and tatty nightlife.
    My own view is Bill charms that old French girl head of IMF Ms Largarde, who is a politician and a diplomat not a real economist who really looks at the hard numbers or asks the hard questions.
    Bill English will produce evidence showing the systematic cuts make to public service positions, the holding down of academics wages and the potential economic benefits of the governments road building ( the road system is admittedly third world and Auckland-Hamilton a dirt track) and electrification and refinement of Auckland train system. The international jet set don’t come here anyway and minor celebrities probably are sensible enough to only visit privately or Wellington and Queenstown . So few know what a bit of crap Auckland is . A seedy third world pacific town with a core population of white trash rednecks. The North Shore is basically a displaced English, Scottish, ZA suburb. In the once rich suburbs like Remuera and Herne Bay the only established middle class left are very old.



Authorised by Martyn Bradbury, The Editor, TheDailyBlog, 5 Victoria St East/Queen St, CBD, Auckland, New Zealand.